Scouts have bumpy landing

On Mar 21, 9:26 pm, Mxsmanic wrote:
Tim writes:
Is there anything you don't know?

Many things, but I don't generally discuss things that I don't know,

Yes you do, you're discussing aviation and you don't undrstand thing
one about it, just a bunch of facts you've digested and are ****ting
out far from their original state (as is usually the case with ****)



Bertie

Bertie the Bunyip writes:

Yes you do, you're discussing aviation and you don't undrstand thing
one about it, just a bunch of facts you've digested and are ****ting
out far from their original state (as is usually the case with ****)

Consistently exaggerating does not help you to be persuasive or credible.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.

Mxsmanic wrote in
news
Bertie the Bunyip writes:

Yes you do, you're discussing aviation and you don't undrstand thing
one about it, just a bunch of facts you've digested and are ****ting
out far from their original state (as is usually the case with ****)

Consistently exaggerating does not help you to be persuasive or credible.

I'm not trying to be either, fjukkwit.

"Darkwing" theducksmail"AT"yahoo.com wrote in
:


"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
...
Gary writes:

Lets see...he's an aviation professional, running the local airport
where the aircraft was based. He'd know the aircraft owner, and
all the A&P's at the field. As airport manager, I guarantee he's
spoken to all of the parties involved, probably had a look at the
plane and the maintenance records, and he may very well have been a
witness to the landing.

More importantly, you agree with him.

I wish you would go to a medical forum and argue with doctors about
symptoms and prognosis, it would be a damn hoot.


You were 6000 miles away from the incident, you haven't left your
apartment since, your only knowledge of the landing was what you
read in the links posted above, you have no aviation background, and
you've never been in a light plane or seen a maintenance log.

More importantly, you disagree with me.

He's more qualified to determine the state of maintenance.

More importantly, you assume that anyone who agrees with you is more
qualified.


I'm nominating you for the Usenet Idiot Savant award.


I don't think he qualifies, actually. Aside from being an asshole, I
don't see any one particular talent he has that would distinguish him as
one.


Now, usenet kook of the month he has a shot at... Do I have a second?


Bertie

Bertie