![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Recently, Jay Honeck posted:
The controller told ME to go around, remember? I would have landed behind the student pilot ahead of me -- or over him, if need be -- if the controller hadn't given the order to go around. So... let's see. If under option #1 you landed behind the student, you had enough room to guarantee a full stop before running him down? Since your option #2 would have been to scare the bejeezus out of the student by landing "over him", I presume the student wasn't near the far end of the runway, so some numbers just don't seem right, here. If you needed to be told to "go around" in that scenario, perhaps the controller knows you personally? ;-) Neil |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The controller told ME to go around, remember? I would have landed
behind the student pilot ahead of me -- or over him, if need be -- if the controller hadn't given the order to go around. So... let's see. If under option #1 you landed behind the student, you had enough room to guarantee a full stop before running him down? Since your option #2 would have been to scare the bejeezus out of the student by landing "over him", I presume the student wasn't near the far end of the runway, so some numbers just don't seem right, here. If you needed to be told to "go around" in that scenario, perhaps the controller knows you personally? ;-) What I thought I could or could not do is irrelevant. The controller told me to go around, so I did -- end of story. At an uncontrolled field, if the student had cut in front of me (as he did when he was ordered to do so by the tower controller) I would have executed a 360 degree turn for spacing, or landed short behind him. I also would have got on the radio and asked him to land long and keep it rolling. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Recently, Jay Honeck posted:
The controller told ME to go around, remember? I would have landed behind the student pilot ahead of me -- or over him, if need be -- if the controller hadn't given the order to go around. So... let's see. If under option #1 you landed behind the student, you had enough room to guarantee a full stop before running him down? Since your option #2 would have been to scare the bejeezus out of the student by landing "over him", I presume the student wasn't near the far end of the runway, so some numbers just don't seem right, here. If you needed to be told to "go around" in that scenario, perhaps the controller knows you personally? ;-) What I thought I could or could not do is irrelevant. The controller told me to go around, so I did -- end of story. My point was that had I been on that approach, and saw the plane ahead of me stop dead on the runway, I would have _told the controller_ that I was going around, not figure out how to land with the other plane still on the runway. At an uncontrolled field, if the student had cut in front of me (as he did when he was ordered to do so by the tower controller) I would have executed a 360 degree turn for spacing, or landed short behind him. I also would have got on the radio and asked him to land long and keep it rolling. Which the student may or may not have done while you've committed to landing. I also would not want to be in the pattern with someone suddenly pulling a 360 on final, either. IMO, the scenrios you're presenting do not reflect the most courteous or safe options. Neil |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Which the student may or may not have done while you've committed to
landing. I also would not want to be in the pattern with someone suddenly pulling a 360 on final, either. IMO, the scenrios you're presenting do not reflect the most courteous or safe options. Cutting in front of someone on final, whether under orders or voluntary, is never safe nor courteous. Which, of course, is the point of this entire thread. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Jay Honeck wrote: Cutting in front of someone on final, whether under orders or voluntary, is never safe nor courteous. Never? At any distance? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Recently, Jay Honeck posted:
Which the student may or may not have done while you've committed to landing. I also would not want to be in the pattern with someone suddenly pulling a 360 on final, either. IMO, the scenrios you're presenting do not reflect the most courteous or safe options. Cutting in front of someone on final, whether under orders or voluntary, is never safe nor courteous. I don't see how following a controller's instructions is discourteous, but it may not always reflect the best judgement, so there are appropriate responses for the PIC in those instances, e.g. "unable". I'm not too surprised that a student wouldn't be comfortable using that option. Which, of course, is the point of this entire thread. This thread seemed more like an aero version of "road rage" to me. In a newsgroup with a lot of folks seeking to learn, that can't be a Good Thing. Neil |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jay Honeck" wrote in message ups.com... Cutting in front of someone on final, whether under orders or voluntary, is never safe nor courteous. That's true only if there isn't sufficient space available, which was not the case here. Which, of course, is the point of this entire thread. It appears your point in starting this lengthy thread was solely to vent about a controller issuing a go around made necessary by the actions of a pilot. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 31 Mar 2007 06:48:38 -0700, "Jay Honeck" wrote
in om: At an uncontrolled field, if the student had cut in front of me (as he did when he was ordered to do so by the tower controller) I would have executed a 360 degree turn for spacing, Such a maneuver would place you in the blind to arriving traffic during certain quadrants of the 360* turn. What do you have against S-turns to increase spacing? or landed short behind him. I also would have got on the radio and asked him to land long and keep it rolling. Technically, that is not in accordance with the Self-announce FAA policy for CTAF. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jay Honeck" wrote in message ps.com... At an uncontrolled field, if the student had cut in front of me (as he did when he was ordered to do so by the tower controller) I would have executed a 360 degree turn for spacing, or landed short behind him. I also would have got on the radio and asked him to land long and keep it rolling. Cut in front of you? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jay Honeck" wrote in message ups.com... You know, for a linear thinker, you can't seem to keep on the track with your train of thought. What do you base that on? The controller told ME to go around, remember? I recall your original post said the controller issued the go around, and I recall in a later post you said you went around because the controller misjudged the spacing. I would have landed behind the student pilot ahead of me -- or over him, if need be -- if the controller hadn't given the order to go around. Well, then it was a damned good thing you were at a towered field with an alert controller! The 172 may have decided to continue down the runway after a brief stop. He's out of your view beneath your nose, you land on top of him. Had it happened at an uncontrolled field, or if the controller hadn't been paying attention, you and your family and the occupants of the 172 could all be dead now. That controller may very well have saved your life, and all you can do is complain about him having the audacity to insert another airplane in to the available space in front of you. You should be ashamed! Obviously by sending me around the controller was admitting his failure to maintain what he judged to be proper spacing between us. This situation had nothing to do with my comfort, and everything to do with a Class D'oh! controller who was looking through the wrong end of his binoculars. If your story is accurate, the controller had proper spacing and was paying close attention to the situation. The go around was issued after the 172 unexpectedly stopped on the runway, something the controller had no control over. It was an action of the pilot that forced the go around, not misjudged spacing by the controller. The controller did his job without error and possibly saved your life. Instead of bitching about it you should be thanking him. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Round Engines | john smith | Piloting | 20 | February 15th 07 03:31 AM |
induced airflow | buttman | Piloting | 3 | February 19th 06 04:36 AM |
Round Engines | Voxpopuli | Naval Aviation | 16 | May 31st 05 06:48 PM |
Source of Induced Drag | Ken Kochanski | Soaring | 2 | January 10th 04 12:18 AM |
Predicting ground effects on induced power | Marc Shorten | Soaring | 0 | October 28th 03 11:18 AM |