![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Larry Dighera" wrote in message ... : On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 21:37:38 -0400, Jose : wrote in : : : If you don't like what you choose to watch, turn off the TV. : : And what of the news you'd like to watch, but because it may have a : negative impact on the news media's parent company, it isn't reported? : PBS? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 22:08:00 GMT, "Blueskies"
wrote in : PBS? International short wave broadcasts? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Blueskies wrote:
"Larry Dighera" wrote in message ... : On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 21:37:38 -0400, Jose : wrote in : : : If you don't like what you choose to watch, turn off the TV. : : And what of the news you'd like to watch, but because it may have a : negative impact on the news media's parent company, it isn't reported? : PBS? PBS rocks. I was up until 2am last night for this thing they did on Enron. PBS and dailyrotten. Bread and butter. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Larry Dighera" wrote in message ... On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 21:37:38 -0400, Jose wrote in : If you don't like what you choose to watch, turn off the TV. And what of the news you'd like to watch, but because it may have a negative impact on the news media's parent company, it isn't reported? Well said. If Enron had owned CNN... -c |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jose" wrote in message ... quo where pictures of Cho draw viewers, which equates to higher ratings, which equates to higher ad revenue, which equates to higher salaries for the executives?... I don't even know (or care) who "Cho" is. Why? Because I choose what I watch. Do you? If you don't, that is a problem. But if you do, then why do you want to choose what =I= and everybody else watches? Settle down. Nobody said anything about choosing for you. You want to make movies about how drugs, violence and promiscuous sex are genuinely bad, go make them. It's not all that hard. LOL! Hell, movie making is cheap and easy, isn't it? -c |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't even know (or care) who "Cho" is. Why? Because I choose what I
watch. Do you? If you don't, that is a problem. But if you do, then why do you want to choose what =I= and everybody else watches? Settle down. Nobody said anything about choosing for you. Uh.... that's not quite the case. You said: Should stick with the status quo where pictures of Cho draw viewers, which equates to higher ratings... The status quo comes about because we, collectively, are choosing it. Further you state: Movies about how drugs, violence and promiscuous sex are genuinely bad would be better than Snoop Dog's Girls Gone Wild extravaganza and all its miscellaneous internet-porn spinoffs... While that is a neutral statement of opinion, its relevance only comes from the fact that we, collectively, are choosing differently from this opinion. The post implies this is a Bad Thing. By implication, you would have us choose differently, or be chosen for differently. You want to make movies about how drugs, violence and promiscuous sex are genuinely bad, go make them. It's not all that hard. LOL! Hell, movie making is cheap and easy, isn't it? 1: Yes, it is. Look at YouTube. 2: If it isn't, then you need money. That means you need viewers or backers. Viewers mean you're back making what viewers want to see. Backers mean you're making what the backers want us to see. Grab a super-8 camera and =make= the movie you want us to see. Then put it on YouTube and see if we =do= want to see it. It's cheaper than flying. ![]() Jose -- Get high on gasoline: fly an airplane. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jose" wrote in message ... I don't even know (or care) who "Cho" is. Why? Because I choose what I watch. Do you? If you don't, that is a problem. But if you do, then why do you want to choose what =I= and everybody else watches? Settle down. Nobody said anything about choosing for you. Uh.... that's not quite the case. You said: Should stick with the status quo where pictures of Cho draw viewers, which equates to higher ratings... The status quo comes about because we, collectively, are choosing it. "GRESHAM, Ore. (AP) - A 15-year-old boy charged with attempted aggravated murder after a shooting shattered some windows at a high school told police he was influenced by a television documentary on the 1999 Columbine shootings in Colorado." http://www.katu.com/news/6982432.html I'm just sayin'... Why do we know the names and faces of Clebold, Harris, Malvo, Muhammed, Cho, Whitman, Manson, Bundy.... but we'd have to do an internet lookup to recall the name of the Holocaust-survivor professor who gave his life protecting his VT students? -c |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
french police !! | TOUCO | Naval Aviation | 0 | April 1st 05 05:14 AM |
french police !! | TOUCO | Owning | 0 | April 1st 05 05:14 AM |
french police !! | TOUCO | Piloting | 0 | April 1st 05 05:14 AM |
Police State | Grantland | Military Aviation | 0 | September 15th 03 12:53 PM |