A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

OT - 10 steps to fascist police state



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 25th 07, 11:08 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Blueskies
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 979
Default OT - 10 steps to fascist police state


"Larry Dighera" wrote in message ...
: On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 21:37:38 -0400, Jose
: wrote in :
:
: If you don't like what you choose to watch, turn off the TV.
:
: And what of the news you'd like to watch, but because it may have a
: negative impact on the news media's parent company, it isn't reported?
:


PBS?


  #2  
Old April 26th 07, 12:14 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Larry Dighera
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,953
Default OT - 10 steps to fascist police state

On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 22:08:00 GMT, "Blueskies"
wrote in
:

PBS?


International short wave broadcasts?
  #3  
Old April 26th 07, 12:20 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Erik
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 166
Default OT - 10 steps to fascist police state

Blueskies wrote:

"Larry Dighera" wrote in message ...
: On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 21:37:38 -0400, Jose
: wrote in :
:
: If you don't like what you choose to watch, turn off the TV.
:
: And what of the news you'd like to watch, but because it may have a
: negative impact on the news media's parent company, it isn't reported?
:


PBS?



PBS rocks. I was up until 2am last night for this thing
they did on Enron.

PBS and dailyrotten. Bread and butter.

  #4  
Old April 26th 07, 06:14 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
gatt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 478
Default OT - 10 steps to fascist police state


"Larry Dighera" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 21:37:38 -0400, Jose
wrote in :

If you don't like what you choose to watch, turn off the TV.


And what of the news you'd like to watch, but because it may have a
negative impact on the news media's parent company, it isn't reported?


Well said. If Enron had owned CNN...

-c


  #5  
Old April 26th 07, 06:14 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
gatt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 478
Default OT - 10 steps to fascist police state


"Jose" wrote in message
...

quo where pictures of Cho draw viewers, which equates to higher ratings,
which equates to higher ad revenue, which equates to higher salaries for
the executives?...


I don't even know (or care) who "Cho" is. Why? Because I choose what I
watch. Do you? If you don't, that is a problem. But if you do, then why
do you want to choose what =I= and everybody else watches?


Settle down. Nobody said anything about choosing for you.

You want to make movies about how drugs, violence and promiscuous sex are
genuinely bad, go make them. It's not all that hard.


LOL! Hell, movie making is cheap and easy, isn't it?


-c


  #6  
Old April 26th 07, 06:22 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Jose
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 897
Default OT - 10 steps to fascist police state

I don't even know (or care) who "Cho" is. Why? Because I choose what I
watch. Do you? If you don't, that is a problem. But if you do, then why
do you want to choose what =I= and everybody else watches?

Settle down. Nobody said anything about choosing for you.


Uh.... that's not quite the case. You said:
Should stick with the status quo where pictures of Cho
draw viewers, which equates to higher ratings...


The status quo comes about because we, collectively, are choosing it.
Further you state:

Movies about how drugs, violence and promiscuous sex are genuinely bad would
be better than Snoop Dog's Girls Gone Wild extravaganza and all its
miscellaneous internet-porn spinoffs...


While that is a neutral statement of opinion, its relevance only comes
from the fact that we, collectively, are choosing differently from this
opinion. The post implies this is a Bad Thing. By implication, you
would have us choose differently, or be chosen for differently.

You want to make movies about how drugs, violence and promiscuous sex are
genuinely bad, go make them. It's not all that hard.


LOL! Hell, movie making is cheap and easy, isn't it?


1: Yes, it is. Look at YouTube.
2: If it isn't, then you need money. That means you need viewers or
backers. Viewers mean you're back making what viewers want to see.
Backers mean you're making what the backers want us to see.

Grab a super-8 camera and =make= the movie you want us to see. Then put
it on YouTube and see if we =do= want to see it.

It's cheaper than flying.

Jose
--
Get high on gasoline: fly an airplane.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.
  #7  
Old April 26th 07, 08:17 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
gatt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 478
Default OT - 10 steps to fascist police state


"Jose" wrote in message
...
I don't even know (or care) who "Cho" is. Why? Because I choose what I
watch. Do you? If you don't, that is a problem. But if you do, then
why do you want to choose what =I= and everybody else watches?

Settle down. Nobody said anything about choosing for you.


Uh.... that's not quite the case. You said:
Should stick with the status quo where pictures of Cho draw viewers,
which equates to higher ratings...


The status quo comes about because we, collectively, are choosing it.



"GRESHAM, Ore. (AP) - A 15-year-old boy charged with attempted aggravated
murder after a shooting shattered some windows at a high school told police
he was influenced by a television documentary on the 1999 Columbine
shootings in Colorado."
http://www.katu.com/news/6982432.html

I'm just sayin'...

Why do we know the names and faces of Clebold, Harris, Malvo, Muhammed, Cho,
Whitman, Manson, Bundy.... but we'd have to do an internet lookup to
recall the name of the Holocaust-survivor professor who gave his life
protecting his VT students?

-c


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
french police !! TOUCO Naval Aviation 0 April 1st 05 05:14 AM
french police !! TOUCO Owning 0 April 1st 05 05:14 AM
french police !! TOUCO Piloting 0 April 1st 05 05:14 AM
Police State Grantland Military Aviation 0 September 15th 03 12:53 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.