![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay Honeck wrote:
It's very sad, IMHO, as many thousands of people have had their Grand Canyon experience drastically diminished so that a far smaller number of people can quietly hike into it. So what would the odds be of being caught if you just flew the canyon like you were entitled to, then disappeared into the canyons in Utah? An older airplane, or an experimental with the small numbers would be pretty much impossible to read the tail number even with binoculars. tom |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
With regard to the Grand Canyon, I must admit I am of mixed opinions
because I am a pilot, but also spent summers out there (in the early 90's) in college working with the National Park Service Resources Management office, and specifically also the pilot who is the NPS point person on this issue. The NPS pilot who worked on this project is one of us (ie a general aviation pilot who flew for the park and also owns a 172), and you can meet him at the NPS stand in the Federal Pavillion at OSH, he has been coming to OSH for quite a few years now and can explain all the history behind this far better than can I. It is VERY controversial. The air tour business had gotten so busy, and so intrusive (to MANY people) that the Park Service had to intervene with the help of the FAA, and in response to the dramatic increase in air tour business over the Canyon. Some structure had to be placed to bring order to the business, and hence we have the regulations as we see them now. The corridors that you see on the Grand Canyon special use VFR map (which looks like a detailed sectional or terminal area chart) is in response to the HUGE number of complaints about how the air tour business was conducting itself, it was essentially a free for all. They were not really aimed at us, the occasional VFR pilot flying a Cessna, but we get lumped in as well. If you spend any time beneath any of the VFR corridors, you quickly get a sense of how busy it really is. A constant stream of Jet Rangers, Twin Otters, and other aircraft flying the tours that quickly makes the noise issue very paramount. The VFR routes over the canyon bring some structure to the mess, and was really needed as the traffic count was climbing quite dramatically. It would be the same if there were no Ripon-Fisk arrival at OSH, so one could very reasonably argue that it is a safety issue as well. The wreckage of the Connie and DC-4 (if I remember correctly) at the bottom of the canyon can attest to that. Flying below the rim is spectacular, but not for the faint of heart. It is basically an inverted mountain, so all the warnings and recommendations for flying to the back-country strips in Idaho or flying over the mountains out west would apply in spades at Grand Canyon. So going for a spin down in the canyon might be fun, and you probably would get away with it (no radar), but wouldn't necessarily be smart. I used to hike extensively in the Canyon, and I can say that even though I am a pilot, there is something to say about visiting a national park and NOT having the noise of the constant stream of Jet Rangers and Twin Otters flying overhead. That means ALOT to ALOT of people. I wouldn't be so quick to label them "noise nazi's" when you are talking about one of the crown jewel national parks in our country. It's not like the dimwit who builds his house next to the airport that has been there for many years (a problem I encounter at my local airport C29, and they ARE noise nazi's!). So that is my perspective, both as a pilot and someone who worked at Grand Canyon. If you want to learn more, meet me at the Federal Pavillion in July at OSH. -Ryan in Madison |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tom,
So what would the odds be of being caught if you just flew the canyon like you were entitled to, then disappeared into the canyons in Utah? Real high. That place is full of park rangers. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Thomas Borchert wrote: Tom, So what would the odds be of being caught if you just flew the canyon like you were entitled to, then disappeared into the canyons in Utah? Real high. That place is full of park rangers. A little duct tape to the N numbers will help here. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
("Newps" wrote)
A little duct tape to the N numbers will help here. Ok. That makes sense. http://www.alexisparkinn.com/photogallery/NealHoward/checkerbird2.jpg I'm with you so far... Montblack |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Lyc IO-540 won't make RPM. | [email protected] | Owning | 12 | December 14th 06 10:21 PM |
how I map my flights | Snowbird | Instrument Flight Rules | 10 | November 30th 03 11:26 PM |
How much does a CFI make? | Peter Gibbons | Piloting | 27 | August 17th 03 02:48 AM |
$$$'s make right? | Sydney Hoeltzli | Piloting | 9 | July 15th 03 04:54 AM |