Your opinion on this landing

They pull those wings up at the tips, no?

No. Not in the test I saw. They pull up at various points along the
wing, simulating normal wing loading.

Jose
--
Quantum Mechanics is like this: God =does= play dice with the universe,
except there's no God, and there's no dice. And maybe there's no universe.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.

"Jose" wrote in message
t...
They pull those wings up at the tips, no?

No. Not in the test I saw. They pull up at various points along the
wing, simulating normal wing loading.


This might be the test you recall Jose. I would have to agree it was hardly
a pin-point failure, and certainly not at the root. Seems to be a pretty
good example of a well designed wing.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=6Uo0C01Fwb8

This might be the test you recall Jose. I would have to agree it was hardly
a pin-point failure, and certainly not at the root. Seems to be a pretty
good example of a well designed wing.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=6Uo0C01Fwb8

No, this wasn't it. What I recall (IIRC) was in German - maybe it was
an Airbus wing. There were three views, I thought I had them on my hard
drive but alas, I don't.

Nonetheless, this one is similar in that the failure happened all at
once, all over.

Jose
--
Quantum Mechanics is like this: God =does= play dice with the universe,
except there's no God, and there's no dice. And maybe there's no universe.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.

On May 13, 8:08 am, Jose wrote:
They pull those wings up at the tips, no?

No. Not in the test I saw. They pull up at various points along the
wing, simulating normal wing loading.

Jose
--
Quantum Mechanics is like this: God =does= play dice with the universe,
except there's no God, and there's no dice. And maybe there's no universe.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.

God doesn't play with dice, his dice just have a lot more sides than
Einstein understood.

-Robert