![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 6, 10:34 am, "Gig 601XL Builder" wrDOTgiaconaATsuddenlink.net
wrote: wrote: You have an arrogant attitude. I have more in my 401K than you do, but that's not the point. I have a legitimate right to gripe about over-inflated gas prices which are clearly a result of poorly managed supply (not increasing demand). Investing money in the industry which I don't have at my disposal (and no, 401K funds typically don't allow you to target one or two stocks) as a way of saying "if you can't beat them, join them" is BS. Also, trying to insult my education is juvenile. You are what, 25? 28? You act like 17. Dean You seem to be under the misconception that it is the oil company's job to keep prices as low as posible. This is not the case. It is their job to keep profits as high as they can. Obviously the market is able to deal with prices at thier current rate because according to all the reports I've seen holiday driving didn't drop a bit this past memorial day weekend. I didn't go anywhere... not at these prices! I'm not claiming its the oil companies fault anyway, its really our EPA restrictions that prevent new refineries from being built. Think that is going to change? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Gig 601XL Builder" wrDOTgiaconaATsuddenlink.net wrote in message ... You seem to be under the misconception that it is the oil company's job to keep prices as low as posible. This is not the case. It is their job to keep profits as high as they can. Obviously the market is able to deal with prices at thier current rate because according to all the reports I've seen holiday driving didn't drop a bit this past memorial day weekend. How's general aviation doing? How are the airlines doing? Who do you suppose is subsidizing all those federal bailouts? Notice that the cost of groceries and postage are going up? Notice how the cost of airplane rentals is going up? At what point do we say "It's not the oil company's job to keep oil prices as low as possible, but it's America's job to protect its own economy instead of letting Exxon make record profits while the entire US economy suffers?" If you guys want to get Draconian about it, I think it's perfectly fair for Uncle Sam to push back. Don't Tread on Me, et al. -c |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 6, 8:46 am, wrote:
On Jun 6, 9:39 am, kontiki wrote: wrote: Oooh, so if I invest a whole $500 in oil, I might make what, $500 if I am lucky? Wow, big deal... Exactly. Do you expect them to just start paying you money while until you save enough beer money to buy some shares? Sheesh go collect a welfare check. It takes money to make money in the stock market. That's the general idea. If you don't already have it, you have nothing to leverage to make any real money. Really? Wow I didn't know that! Talk about needing an education! By the way, I have a B.S.E.E. and have taken economics courses on the time value of money, so I understand that anything less than $100K invested in oil isn't going to make enough money to really be worth crowing about. With the cost of living rising as fast as it is, you need to be making at least 10% on your money, and $100K will only earn about $10K annually at that rate of return. Housing, transportation and medical are the biggest rising cost factors and they aren't included in the consumer price index, specifically so that the government can claim low inflation! Is $500 big money to you? You are full of crap dude. I started with about $7K that I rolled over from a 401K account from a previous job. I eventually rolled it into a Roth and made modest contributions and investments over a period of the last 7 years. Now the balance is over $80K and I didn't have to break a sweat. And yes, I've taken the time to learn about investing and researched stocks on my own. I've bought and sold shares in oil companies over that time and made money. Its not rocket science. You have a loser attitude. You have an arrogant attitude. I have more in my 401K than you do, but that's not the point. I have a legitimate right to gripe about over-inflated gas prices which are clearly a result of poorly managed supply (not increasing demand). Investing money in the industry which I don't have at my disposal (and no, 401K funds typically don't allow you to target one or two stocks) as a way of saying "if you can't beat them, join them" is BS. Also, trying to insult my education is juvenile. You are what, 25? 28? You act like 17. Dean Gas prices are inflated to you. They are not inflated to the guy who is working to sell TO you. Buy a more fuel-efficient car, car-pool, whatever. Just quit griping. The supply isn't poorly managed. The oil pool is finite. It used to bubble out of the ground on its own; now they are drilling exploratory wells as deep as 13,000 feet. It's running low and playing hard to get. AND there are more people wanting it. I do SO wish I had invested in oil stocks about 5 years ago... We used to have more mass transit in this country. CAR companies worked hard to get rid of it in the first half of the 1900s, and it worked quite well. Bummer. Today, people can stop buying the guzzlers, and that would go a long way to end the carping about the price of gas. As far as the 401, "takes money to make money", etc. Many of today's rich are not Kennedys--by which I mean they didn't inherit money and influence, but they somehow made it. And not likely by just working 60 hours per week. They invested what they could, early in their careers. Making $500 on an investment isn't much, but keep rolling it back in. Next time you have $1000, next time $2000, etc. After a while, you have some real money. Most young people today could easily retire rich if they stopped with the $5 bottled water, cut back a bit on the Starbucks, and bought wine for a buck less per bottle. Put all that away from the time you are 20, and in many cases it's a pretty good starter nest egg. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "kontiki" wrote in message ... wrote: Oooh, so if I invest a whole $500 in oil, I might make what, $500 if I am lucky? Wow, big deal... Exactly. Do you expect them to just start paying you money while until you save enough beer money to buy some shares? Sheesh go collect a welfare check. It takes money to make money in the stock market. That's the general idea. If you don't already have it, you have nothing to leverage to make any real money. Really? Wow I didn't know that! The best leverage is SMART'S. Lynn Tilton, whose company, Patriarch Partners, just bought MD Helicopters a couple years ago, was a single Mom ten years ago, and is now worth over $1 BILLION from stock investments. There's a number of people doing stock analysis who made their fortunes starting with just a few hundreds. Before my wife "retired" from the stock brokerage business to run OUR business, she knew, personally, dozens of self-made millionaires. What do they have that Dean hasn't got? Lemme guess... |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Matt Barrow" wrote in message ... There's a number of people doing stock analysis who made their fortunes starting with just a few hundreds. Before my wife "retired" from the stock brokerage business to run OUR business, she knew, personally, dozens of self-made millionaires. What do they have that Dean hasn't got? People used to defend Enron. An electrician down the road from me that worked for PGE--whom Enron acquired--lost his $330,000 retirement investment. Apparently, the Enron book-cookers were just smarter and had something they the electrician didn't have. Nobody defends Enron anymore, but, at the same time, nobody listened when a handful of people predicted disaster. (People did the same with the dot com industry, but as long as people were making money hand over fist, they didn't bother to listen.) -c |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
gatt wrote:
People used to defend Enron. An electrician down the road from me that worked for PGE--whom Enron acquired--lost his $330,000 retirement investment. Apparently, the Enron book-cookers were just smarter and had something they the electrician didn't have. Nobody defends Enron anymore, but, at the same time, nobody listened when a handful of people predicted disaster. (People did the same with the dot com industry, but as long as people were making money hand over fist, they didn't bother to listen.) I don't defend Enron, but am also not entirely sympathetic to those who "lost their whole retirement nestegg". I saw a lot of news stories about these unfortunate folks, but never heard a reporter ask them the obvious question. "Why would a sane person invest their entire retirement nestegg in one company's stock?". Enron employees were not required to buy Enron stock in their retirement plans. They did so because of one reason. Greed. They wanted to make high double and triple digit returns on their investments and threw caution and common sense out the window. Enron was most definitely a scam, but common sense goes a long way towards minimizing the effect of any one bad apple on one's retirement portfolio. John Galban=====N4BQ (PA28-180) -- Message posted via AviationKB.com http://www.aviationkb.com/Uwe/Forums...ation/200706/1 |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message oups.com... On Jun 6, 4:07 am, kontiki wrote: wrote: Really? Got a $100K I can have to invest in the oil companies? I don't have it myself, so your suggestion does me no good. You don't need $100k in order to be an investor you doofus. Sign up for a Schwab/Etrade/Scottrade account for as littel as $500. Sheesh... the education system is this country is as corrupt as the government. Oh yeah... schools are run by the government. Oooh, so if I invest a whole $500 in oil, I might make what, $500 if I am lucky? Wow, big deal... Just because you're "tapped"... (I could add some more acerbic adjectives to describe childish envy...) |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message oups.com... On Jun 6, 4:07 am, kontiki wrote: wrote: Really? Got a $100K I can have to invest in the oil companies? I don't have it myself, so your suggestion does me no good. You don't need $100k in order to be an investor you doofus. Sign up for a Schwab/Etrade/Scottrade account for as littel as $500. Sheesh... the education system is this country is as corrupt as the government. Oh yeah... schools are run by the government. Oooh, so if I invest a whole $500 in oil, I might make what, $500 if I am lucky? Wow, big deal... It takes money to make money in the stock market. If you don't already have it, you have nothing to leverage to make any real money. Talk about needing an education! By the way, I have a B.S.E.E. and have taken economics courses on the time value of money, so I understand that anything less than $100K invested in oil isn't going to make enough money to really be worth crowing about. With the cost of living rising as fast as it is, you need to be making at least 10% on your money, and $100K will only earn about $10K annually at that rate of return. Housing, transportation and medical are the biggest rising cost factors and they aren't included in the consumer price index, specifically so that the government can claim low inflation! Is $500 big money to you? $500 isn't big money to me, $0.01 is big money to me. I have change jars at home, and a lot of what they are filled with is change I've picked up (yes, I'll stop to pick up a penny), and I always check pay phones and vending machines for change people leave behind. It adds up quite well over time. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "kontiki" wrote in message ... wrote: Really? Got a $100K I can have to invest in the oil companies? I don't have it myself, so your suggestion does me no good. You don't need $100k in order to be an investor you doofus. Sign up for a Schwab/Etrade/Scottrade account for as littel as $500. Sheesh... the education system is this country is as corrupt as the government. Oh yeah... schools are run by the government. One follows the other. If you loook back to the 1840's and Thomas Mann, you find that was precisely the objective. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
You can tell high fuel prices ... | john smith | Piloting | 0 | August 17th 06 07:09 PM |
High fuel prices = buyer's market? | Greg Copeland[_1_] | Owning | 22 | August 7th 06 11:15 AM |
IVO pireps wanted.. high performance/high speed... | Dave S | Home Built | 8 | June 2nd 04 04:12 PM |
'Chicken-Hawk' argument doesn't fly | Vaughn | Military Aviation | 1 | February 24th 04 10:47 PM |
'Chicken-Hawk' argument doesn't fly | Vaughn | Naval Aviation | 0 | February 24th 04 11:18 AM |