![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
("Gig 601XL Builder" wrote)
After any lawyer gets three of these they are dis-barred. The American Bar Association is for the lawyers. The Public Legal Pannel needs to be for us citizens. Here's how it works: A jury rules on what cases go to court. Five people are appointed ...(per county, state, whatever) Five people are picked .........(like a jury pool) One person is randomly chosen as alternate, each day. Some basic training would be required - 2 nights per week/ 10 weeks Six month term, after training. They hear requests to go to court Mon-Wed-Sat(!) (8am-10am) and (7pm-9pm) Tue-Thur (same times) are for deliberations. 6-3 vote, your case moves forward. You get up to 10 request (per case) to be ruled (voted) on. This goes through, this does not, this is ok, this is outrageous, etc. There, it's like putting the Supreme Court at the beginning of the process. Paul-Mont |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Montblack wrote:
The Public Legal Pannel needs to be for us citizens. Here's how it works: A jury rules on what cases go to court. Five people are appointed ...(per county, state, whatever) Five people are picked .........(like a jury pool) One person is randomly chosen as alternate, each day. I concur... but these people should have more stringent credentials than just being a *voter*. For a person to be eligable to be on this panel they should: 1) Have no criminal record. 2) Have a job, or had a job and be retired. 3) Not be collecting a government check for subsistance other than a Social Security or retirement check. 4) Not be a party in any pending lawsuit or legal action. Some basic training would be required - 2 nights per week/ 10 weeks If the people meet the simple criterai above, minimal training will be neded and a fair decision will be probable. Six month term, after training. Like it. They hear requests to go to court Mon-Wed-Sat(!) (8am-10am) and (7pm-9pm) Tue-Thur (same times) are for deliberations. 6-3 vote, your case moves forward. You get up to 10 request (per case) to be ruled (voted) on. This goes through, this does not, this is ok, this is outrageous, etc. There, it's like putting the Supreme Court at the beginning of the process. This is all excellent. We should do this today, why wait. People would immediately see lower prices for goods and services for everything. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
("ktbr" wrote)
1) Have no criminal record. 2) Have a job, or had a job and be retired. 3) Not be collecting a government check for subsistance other than a Social Security or retirement check. 4) Not be a party in any pending lawsuit or legal action. I'm ok with a wide variety of people serving - if they can keep up in the training phase. The "training" phase is where we weed out the dreamers (and the not quite able to grasp some core ideas) people, and the people who won't do the work necessary to finish the training class ...and pass the test. Hey, kinda like a (mini) bar exam! So I'm pretty stringent on the back end and more open on the front end. You're the reverse. Paul-Mont |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Montblack wrote:
("Gig 601XL Builder" wrote) After any lawyer gets three of these they are dis-barred. The American Bar Association is for the lawyers. The Public Legal Pannel needs to be for us citizens. Here's how it works: A jury rules on what cases go to court. Five people are appointed ...(per county, state, whatever) Five people are picked .........(like a jury pool) One person is randomly chosen as alternate, each day. Some basic training would be required - 2 nights per week/ 10 weeks Six month term, after training. They hear requests to go to court Mon-Wed-Sat(!) (8am-10am) and (7pm-9pm) Tue-Thur (same times) are for deliberations. 6-3 vote, your case moves forward. You get up to 10 request (per case) to be ruled (voted) on. This goes through, this does not, this is ok, this is outrageous, etc. There, it's like putting the Supreme Court at the beginning of the process. Paul-Mont Good idea and you could pay them each $100K per year and the state would still get of cheap. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|