![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 24, 9:26 am, "Dan Luke" wrote:
"Morgans" wrote: My brother tells me (a computer using electrical engineer) that his screaming fast new computer is so slow with Vista, that he often goes and takes a bathroom break while it opens Adobe. I'm not a micro$oft basher, but they screwed up big, this time. Indeed. We have no plans in our business for "upgrading" to Vista; not for customers' machines, technicians' laptops or our own office workstations. We'll buy XP Pro refurbs if we have to for as long as we can. This will be a real test of Microsoft's power. It might be just the boost Linux needs to go mainstream in a big way. And you know Apple loves it. -- Dan "I have always wished for my computer to be as easy to use as my telephone; my wish has come true, because I can no longer figure out how to use my telephone." - Bjarne Stroustrup Interesting read at http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pgut001/pubs/ vista_cost.html Regards, Jon |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jon" wrote in message
ups.com... On Jun 24, 9:26 am, "Dan Luke" wrote: "I have always wished for my computer to be as easy to use as my telephone; my wish has come true, because I can no longer figure out how to use my telephone." - Bjarne Stroustrup Interesting read at http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pgut001/pubs/vista_cost.html I hear that corporations are staying away from Vista in droves. Even the geeks are saying away. When XP came out, the corporate world, big and small, flocked to it. Now they're holding their noses for Vista and very many have not upgraded their systems from Office 2003 or even Office 2000. It took Microsoft how long to get the major bugs out of XP? Two years? Most of us will be dead and buried before they get Vista stabilized. Lose the corporate AND the vast majority of the consumer ("power user") market, and you're in trouble. Lose the geeks and you're in SERIOUS trouble. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dan Luke" wrote This will be a real test of Microsoft's power. It might be just the boost Linux needs to go mainstream in a big way. And you know Apple loves it. Chuckle Yep! One thing my sister in law says, is "they tried to make Vista look like the Apple OS's. If I had wanted that, I would have gotten a Mac!" -- Jim in NC |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , "Morgans"
wrote: "Dan Luke" wrote This will be a real test of Microsoft's power. It might be just the boost Linux needs to go mainstream in a big way. And you know Apple loves it. Chuckle Yep! One thing my sister in law says, is "they tried to make Vista look like the Apple OS's. If I had wanted that, I would have gotten a Mac!" insert old joke about potatoe and second coming... -- Bob Noel (goodness, please trim replies!!!) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 24, 2:28 pm, "Morgans" wrote:
"Dan Luke" wrote This will be a real test of Microsoft's power. It might be just the boost Linux needs to go mainstream in a big way. And you know Apple loves it. Chuckle Yep! One thing my sister in law says, is "they tried to make Vista look like the Apple OS's. If I had wanted that, I would have gotten a Mac!" -- Jim in NC " The software said it requires Windows 95 or better, so I installed Linux " ![]() |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Morgans wrote:
"Dan Luke" wrote This will be a real test of Microsoft's power. It might be just the boost Linux needs to go mainstream in a big way. And you know Apple loves it. Chuckle Yep! One thing my sister in law says, is "they tried to make Vista look like the Apple OS's. If I had wanted that, I would have gotten a Mac!" If it worked like an Apple, that would be cool. Superficially steeling the Apple styling isn't worth much. Oddly, we've had to do darn little as a software manufacturer to go form Windows 95 to NT to 2000 to XP (other than picking up NEW features). Vista broke that. I had to task two guys for a few weeks fixing things up. It's not just us that's running into the problem. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 6/21/2007 9:15:59 AM, "Viperdoc" wrote:
I've never had a problem with the Jepp program. As an active IFR pilot who uses Jepp's Flightstar to file just about all of my IFR plans over the last four years, I have never had an issue of a lost flight plan filed via Jepp and ultimately CSC/DTC Duats that wasn't my fault (departure time more than 1/2 hour earlier than the time I call clearance). -- Peter |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 6/21/2007 10:00:54 AM, "Peter R." wrote:
(departure time more than 1/2 hour earlier than the time I call clearance). Typo correction: "departure time more than 1/2 hour *LATER* than then time..." -- Peter |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Peter R." wrote in message ... On 6/21/2007 10:00:54 AM, "Peter R." wrote: (departure time more than 1/2 hour earlier than the time I call clearance). Typo correction: "departure time more than 1/2 hour *LATER* than then time..." {Third time's the charm} ....than THE time... |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Long EZ plans, Mini IMP plans, F4U Corsair plans, materials, instruments for sale | reader | Home Built | 1 | January 26th 11 01:40 AM |
Lost flight plans | Dan Luke | Instrument Flight Rules | 22 | August 6th 05 03:08 AM |
Lost comm procedure for Flight Following (more on Honek's posting) | G. Sylvester | Owning | 2 | July 12th 05 03:34 PM |
IFR Flight Plans on the web | Jeff Saylor | Instrument Flight Rules | 2 | May 3rd 04 03:28 PM |
IFR Flight Plans on the web | MLenoch | Piloting | 6 | April 28th 04 03:45 AM |