Come see us at Oshkosh

wrote in message ups.com...
I posted earlier in response to a message from Jay Honeck telling him
to come by our booth at Oshkosh and say high, not meaning to make a
public announcement about a new product we are introducing at Oshkosh,
but it was quickly noticed by others and I was told I was being coy.
I just didn't want to be accused of spamming the group. Well, I
guess I'll take those coy comments as an invitation to post an
announcement:

AeroLEDs is introducing a new high intensity LED wing-tip landing/
recognition light at Oshkosh 2007. If you are interested in seeing
it, come by space 413 in the north aircraft area. We will have them
mounted on a Red/White/Blue Kitfox series 7 that has an eagle graphic
on the tail. Our website is http://www.aeroleds.com

We are just getting our first batch of production units done this week
(without the last minute, would anything ever get done?) and will have
product at the show.

I believe that this is the first product of this type available on the
market. HID landing lights have been the only competition with
Halogen up to this point.

Dean


Thanks for breaking ground with this product. I wish you well, and will look you up at 'the show'...

Due to the positive response that our product has received, we were
able to improve our manufacturing costs (spread out our NRE over more
units) and lower our selling price.

We are now offering our AeroSUN LED landing/recognition lights for
$350 each or $650 for a pair. Customers who paid the previous price
are being credited the difference.

The warranty is 10 years from date of purchase.

Dean W.
AeroLEDs LLC
www.aeroleds.com

Currently we are offering two versions of our AeroSUN LED lights.

The AeroSUN 800 produces 800 lumens on 24 watts of power. This light
is good for taxi and recognition (with built-in wig-wag function) and
can provide supplemental light for a cowl mounted landing light, as
well providing a good forward facing anti-collision light system.

The AeroSUN 800 sells for $175 for one light, or $325 for a pair of
them.

The AeroSUN 1600 produces 1600 lumens on 24 watts of power. This light
is good for landing, taxi, and recognition (with built-in wig-wag
function).

The AeroSUN 1600 sells for $350 for one light, or $650 for a pair of
them.

For more information please visit our website.

Dean Wilkinson
AeroLEDs LLC
www.aeroleds.com

Dean...

Sorry, buddy, but you've crossed that thin line between answering a question
(and I didn't see one posed) and pimping your product in this newsgroup.
The former is accepted practice; the latter is not.

Jim

--
"If you think you can, or think you can't, you're right."
--Henry Ford


wrote in message
ups.com...

Currently we are offering two versions of our AeroSUN LED lights.

The AeroSUN 800 produces 800 lumens on 24 watts of power. This light

RST Engineering wrote:
Dean...

Sorry, buddy, but you've crossed that thin line between answering a
question (and I didn't see one posed) and pimping your product in this
newsgroup. The former is accepted practice; the latter is not.

In your opinion, is it acceptable to put your company's name and/or URL in
your sig? That's not answering any question and is pimping the product -
right?'

Just curious...

Hilton


wrote in message
ups.com...

Currently we are offering two versions of our AeroSUN LED lights.

The AeroSUN 800 produces 800 lumens on 24 watts of power. This light

In my opinion, signing who you work for is one hell of a long stretch from
quoting product and price in the article for a question that wasn't asked.

Jim


In your opinion, is it acceptable to put your company's name and/or URL in
your sig? That's not answering any question and is pimping the product -
right?'

Just curious...

Hilton

"Hilton" wrote

In your opinion, is it acceptable to put your company's name and/or URL in
your sig? That's not answering any question and is pimping the product -
right?'

I think that is the thin line, that Jim is talking about.

Sig lines, OK; much more than that, not OK.

I'm a big supporter of the Aero LED's, and if a conversation about thin
comes up, then pimp away. To make a product announcement is one step over
the line tho', IMHO.
--
Jim in NC

On Aug 29, 11:08 am, "RST Engineering"
wrote:
Dean...

Sorry, buddy, but you've crossed that thin line between answering a question
(and I didn't see one posed) and pimping your product in this newsgroup.
The former is accepted practice; the latter is not.

Jim

I'm sorry, I thought posting a reply to an existing thread would be
acceptable. Guess not...

Dean
AeroLEDs LLC
www.aeroleds.com

In article .com,
wrote:

I'm sorry, I thought posting a reply to an existing thread would be
acceptable. Guess not...

A thread you started with an annoucement, a followup from YOU,
and then your "reply". break the code.

--
Bob Noel
(goodness, please trim replies!!!)

Apology accepted. However, as penitence, you now have to sell each of us who
asks a set of lights for ten percent of list. g

Dean wrote:
I'm sorry, I thought posting a reply to an existing thread would be
acceptable. Guess not...

Dean
AeroLEDs LLC
www.aeroleds.com