A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Electrically Powered Ultralight Aircraft



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 10th 07, 05:18 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.homebuilt,rec.aviation.ultralight,rec.aviation.soaring
Morgans[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,924
Default Electrically Powered Ultralight Aircraft


"Dana wrote
The major problem is the weight of the batteries, still far heavier
than gasoline. Also the lithium polymer batteries used are still
quite expensive (over $10,000 for enough for a half hour flight) and
somewhat dangerous (sort them out and they can explode!)


Damn straight! No way am I going to strap a bunch of lithium polymer
batteries to my butt.

Some of the newer Lithium iron cells, maybe, but they also cost a LOT more.

Still, electric flight, like many have said, still have a way to go.
--
Jim in NC


  #2  
Old August 10th 07, 05:37 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.homebuilt,rec.aviation.ultralight,rec.aviation.soaring
Gig 601XL Builder
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,317
Default Electrically Powered Ultralight Aircraft

Morgans wrote:
"Dana wrote
The major problem is the weight of the batteries, still far heavier
than gasoline. Also the lithium polymer batteries used are still
quite expensive (over $10,000 for enough for a half hour flight) and
somewhat dangerous (sort them out and they can explode!)


Damn straight! No way am I going to strap a bunch of lithium polymer
batteries to my butt.

Some of the newer Lithium iron cells, maybe, but they also cost a LOT
more.
Still, electric flight, like many have said, still have a way to go.


And as if we need more proof of this.

TOKYO: Japan's Toyota Motor Corp. will delay by one or two years the rollout
of new high-mileage hybrids with lithium-ion batteries because of safety
concerns, reported a newspaper.

Toyota's decision was prompted by worries that the batteries could overheat,
catch fire or even explode, the Wall Street Journal on Thursday reported in
its online edition, quoting unnamed Toyota executives.


  #3  
Old August 10th 07, 06:20 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Big John
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 310
Default Electrically Powered Ultralight Aircraft

Gig

Just saw where GM bought a battery company here in US that has
developed batteries that do not catch fire or expload like current
Lithium Polymer's.

GM expects to have a plug in auto on market at least two years before
Toyota can get their batteries sorted out and their auto on the
market.

Big John
*************************************************


On Fri, 10 Aug 2007 11:37:39 -0500, "Gig 601XL Builder"
wrDOTgiaconaATsuddenlink.net wrote:

Morgans wrote:
"Dana wrote
The major problem is the weight of the batteries, still far heavier
than gasoline. Also the lithium polymer batteries used are still
quite expensive (over $10,000 for enough for a half hour flight) and
somewhat dangerous (sort them out and they can explode!)


Damn straight! No way am I going to strap a bunch of lithium polymer
batteries to my butt.

Some of the newer Lithium iron cells, maybe, but they also cost a LOT
more.
Still, electric flight, like many have said, still have a way to go.


And as if we need more proof of this.

TOKYO: Japan's Toyota Motor Corp. will delay by one or two years the rollout
of new high-mileage hybrids with lithium-ion batteries because of safety
concerns, reported a newspaper.

Toyota's decision was prompted by worries that the batteries could overheat,
catch fire or even explode, the Wall Street Journal on Thursday reported in
its online edition, quoting unnamed Toyota executives.


  #4  
Old August 10th 07, 07:11 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Gig 601XL Builder
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,317
Default Electrically Powered Ultralight Aircraft

GM on the cutting edge of anything is a little funny. And I'm sure Sony
didn't think their batteries would do this...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WeWq6rWzChw



Is this the story you are talking about John? If so what is an "LG Chem
cell?"
http://www.autobloggreen.com/2007/06...cts-for-chevy/


Big John wrote:
Gig

Just saw where GM bought a battery company here in US that has
developed batteries that do not catch fire or expload like current
Lithium Polymer's.

GM expects to have a plug in auto on market at least two years before
Toyota can get their batteries sorted out and their auto on the
market.

Big John
*************************************************



  #5  
Old August 10th 07, 06:12 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.homebuilt,rec.aviation.ultralight,rec.aviation.soaring
Larry Dighera
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,953
Default Electrically Powered Ultralight Aircraft

On Thu, 09 Aug 2007 23:13:55 -0400, Dana M. Hague
d(dash)m(dash)hague(at)comcast(dot)net wrote in
:

On Tue, 07 Aug 2007 14:58:07 GMT, Larry Dighera
wrote:

If a 14 HP electric propulsion system weighing 46 lbs could be
constructed, apparently it would permit the use of PPGs by pilots up
to 180 lbs.


A PPG is a LOT more efficient than a powered parachute (PPC), but
still far less efficient than a rigid wing. Still, several electric
PPG's have been flown. The primary goal here is noise and vibration
reduction, a worthy goal when the engine is strapped to the pilot's
back.

The major problem is the weight of the batteries, still far heavier
than gasoline. Also the lithium polymer batteries used are still
quite expensive (over $10,000 for enough for a half hour flight) and
somewhat dangerous (sort them out and they can explode!)

-Dana


That's interesting information. Thank you.


It sounds like you have quite a bit of experience in this area. Are
you able to provide links to any forums or web sites related to this
topic?

  #6  
Old August 11th 07, 12:12 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.homebuilt,rec.aviation.ultralight,rec.aviation.soaring
Dave[_5_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 186
Default Electrically Powered Ultralight Aircraft

Are
you able to provide links to any forums or web sites related to this



Check this out: http://www.calcars.org/news-archive.html

David Johnson


  #7  
Old August 11th 07, 02:59 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.homebuilt,rec.aviation.ultralight,rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 50
Default Electrically Powered Ultralight Aircraft

On Aug 10, 5:12 pm, Dave wrote:
Are

you able to provide links to any forums or web sites related to this


Check this out:http://www.calcars.org/news-archive.html

David Johnson


Lithium Polymer batteries are widely used in RC planes, cars, etc and
are known to be potentially dangerous. Most runaway fires occur during
charging but it has also occurred to a lessor degree during discharge
and even storage. Vented charging safety bags are recommended for this
reason. There is a video on this link that shows the explosive power
of small LiPo's. Consider the size differance of these batteries to
the one hung under the trike in one of the first posts or those that
could be installed in the wings of a sailplane.
http://www.liposack.com/video.html

  #8  
Old August 11th 07, 04:35 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.homebuilt,rec.aviation.ultralight,rec.aviation.soaring
Larry Dighera
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,953
Default Electrically Powered Ultralight Aircraft

On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 06:59:02 -0700, wrote in
.com:


Lithium Polymer batteries are widely used in RC planes, cars, etc and
are known to be potentially dangerous. Most runaway fires occur during
charging but it has also occurred to a lessor degree during discharge
and even storage.


I would assume that the source of these Li-ion Polymer battery fires
is excessive electrical current flowing through the battery either
from too high a charging rate, too high a discharge rate, or a short
internal (as in the case of the Sony laptop cells) or external, or
being over charged. Perhaps it would be prudent to install a circuit
breaker of fuse to prevent too high a current and a timer to
disconnect a forgotten charger.

Vented charging safety bags are recommended for this
reason. There is a video on this link that shows the explosive power
of small LiPo's. Consider the size differance of these batteries to
the one hung under the trike in one of the first posts or those that
could be installed in the wings of a sailplane.
http://www.liposack.com/video.html

Thank you for the link. It is spectacular.


Here are some links relevant to the Sony Lithium laptop battery
recall:

Story: http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=32550
http://news.com.com/Dell+takes+heat+...3-6105828.html

Video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WeWq6...lated&search=#

Explanation of cause:
http://reviews.cnet.com/4660-10165_7-6625980.html
http://www.prnewstoday.com/release.h...H05424082006-1
The recall arises because, on rare occasions, microscopic metal
particles in the recalled battery cells may come into contact with
other parts of the battery cell, leading to a short circuit within the
cell. Typically, a battery pack will simply power off when a cell
short circuit occurs. However, under certain rare conditions, an
internal short circuit may lead to cell overheating and potentially
flames. The potential for this to occur can be affected by variations
in the system configurations found in different notebook computers.

  #9  
Old August 12th 07, 02:47 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.homebuilt,rec.aviation.ultralight,rec.aviation.soaring
Bill Daniels
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 687
Default Electrically Powered Ultralight Aircraft

Please keep in mind that there are many lithium ion and lithium polymer
chemstries. It isn't too informative to just say "Lithium Polymer" or
Lithium Ion" without stating the precise chemistry. Further, chemistries
are changing almost daily. Many are proprietary. There's no such thing as
a "standard" lithium battery chemistry.

Valence, Saft and A123 Systems use chemistries that are far safer than the
relatively inexpensive Korean made model airplane batteries - safer than the
typical laptop or cell phone battery which are spec'd mainly on price.

Interestingly, the safest chemistries in the latest cells also offer faster
charging, greater energy density and will endure a FAR greater number of
charge cycles. They're also potentially cheaper.

I've already made a cell holder for A123 Systems "A1" cells. That's the
lithium phosphate nano cathode one used in 36V DeWalt power tools. You can
buy a couple of new DeWalt 36V power packs for $50 or so on Ebay. Then,
dismantle the pack to retrieve the individual cells. My pack will be 13.8
volts and 11AH weighing 3 pounds. It will be the same size as a 7AH 12V SLA
but weigh less than half as much.

Bill Daniels

Some Lithium cells can suffer thermal runaway and fire. Others are
extremely
wrote in message
oups.com...
On Aug 10, 5:12 pm, Dave wrote:
Are

you able to provide links to any forums or web sites related to this


Check this out:http://www.calcars.org/news-archive.html

David Johnson


Lithium Polymer batteries are widely used in RC planes, cars, etc and
are known to be potentially dangerous. Most runaway fires occur during
charging but it has also occurred to a lessor degree during discharge
and even storage. Vented charging safety bags are recommended for this
reason. There is a video on this link that shows the explosive power
of small LiPo's. Consider the size differance of these batteries to
the one hung under the trike in one of the first posts or those that
could be installed in the wings of a sailplane.
http://www.liposack.com/video.html



  #10  
Old August 13th 07, 10:36 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.homebuilt,rec.aviation.ultralight,rec.aviation.soaring
Dana M. Hague
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 102
Default Electrically Powered Ultralight Aircraft

On Fri, 10 Aug 2007 17:12:09 GMT, Larry Dighera
wrote:

It sounds like you have quite a bit of experience in this area. Are
you able to provide links to any forums or web sites related to this
topic?


Try http://electricppg.com

I've been flying PPG for about 6 years now; got into it when I
realized I couldn't afford to restore my Taylorcraft. Finally managed
to get another plane (Kolb this time), but PPG is so much fun I don't
intend to give it up.

Never flew an electric PPG, though... they're still pretty rare birds.

-Dana
--
--
If replying by email, please make the obvious changes.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Abandon all hope, ye who PRESS ENTER here.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Electrically Powered Ultralight Aircraft Larry Dighera Piloting 178 December 31st 07 08:53 PM
Solar powered aircraft. Was: Can Aircraft Be Far Behind? Jim Logajan Piloting 4 February 9th 07 01:11 PM
World's First Certified Electrically Propelled Aircraft? Larry Dighera Piloting 2 September 22nd 06 01:50 AM
Powered gliders = powered aircraft for 91.205 Mark James Boyd Soaring 2 December 12th 04 03:28 AM
Help! 2motors propelled ultralight aircraft [email protected] Home Built 3 July 9th 03 01:02 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.