![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 15, 8:16 pm, "Danny Deger" wrote:
The engineer in me is dying to know how the sensors knows the difference between cloud to ground and cloud to cloud. Anybody know. Cloud to ground lightning creates a unique RF signature. By recording these radio waves and by using time from GPS satellites to corrdinate those receptions, then the NLDN could pinpoint those ground strikes. When too many ground strikes occur, the network tends to become overloaded; does not detect all strikes. Then the NY Times made some inquires in response to a lightning strike in the area of the former WTC that killed one person. Direct lightning strikes known to have hit both the WTC and Empire State Building (on average 25 and 40 times annually) were not detected; apparently did not create that RF signature. No followup information is available as best I can tell. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "w_tom" wrote Cloud to ground lightning creates a unique RF signature. By recording these radio waves and by using time from GPS satellites to corrdinate those receptions, then the NLDN could pinpoint those ground strikes. When too many ground strikes occur, the network tends to become overloaded; does not detect all strikes. In a gross simplification, cloud to ground flashes produce disturbances in the LF and VLF EM bands. They are received over very long distances, so they are easier to get a map of over a complete region, even with a sparse location of sensors. Probably why it is desirable. Cloud to cloud flashes are mainly in the VHF range, and therefore are line of sight. For a very complete explanation, see https://www.thelightningpeople.com/htm/about/events/ildc/ildc2000/docs/03_CUMMINS.pdf -- Jim in NC |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 17, 2:35 am, "Morgans" wrote:
In a gross simplification, cloud to ground flashes produce disturbances in the LF and VLF EM bands. They are received over very long distances, so they are easier to get a map of over a complete region, even with a sparse location of sensors. Probably why it is desirable. Cloud to cloud flashes are mainly in the VHF range, and therefore are line of sight. Now explain why the system saw no strikes when 25 and 40 direct lightning strikes hit the Empire State Building and WTC annually. I have long been waiting for that answer. Do strikes to tall buildings not create LF and VLF EM radiation? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jonathan Goodish" wrote in message ... Most weather providers obtain lightning data from the National Lightning Detection Network, which is operated by Vaisala. The network displays cloud to ground strikes. Thanks! I just learned something. You can get a free lightning map he https://thunderstorm.vaisala.com/tux...r/explorer.jsp It is for the entire USA, and only updated every 20 minutes, so you can hardly use it to pick your way through the cells, but it could sure help you decide if it is healthy to go flying. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Lightning anyone? | Frode Berg | Piloting | 11 | May 16th 09 05:04 PM |
Warm Weather Pilots, Cold Weather Ops | john smith | Piloting | 3 | December 2nd 04 04:00 PM |
And they say the automated Weather Station problems "ASOS" are insignificant because only light aircraft need Weather Observations and forecasts... | Roy | Piloting | 4 | July 12th 03 04:03 PM |