![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
By way of an addition....
if somebody is in the back it is very easy to rotate for a nice flare without getting close to a tail stall. Even with full flaps. Tlhere is probably only one knot difference in stall speed between two notches and three(full). Fuel and row one passengers only, the cg is very near it's forward limit. A local flying school that also rents out it's Seneca has some weight strapped down in the back area, I think 75 pounds. I think they had three collapses over the last 15 years and none were due to mis-rigging. And it is checked every 50 hours and also they hold an stc for putting a window in so it can be inspected through the nose baggage area each flight. The Visitor wrote: No, and with full flaps it pull an greater aoa for the same authority(down force). It stalls. And the nose can drop real hard. As the stab moves into ground effect the aoa increases also. The Cessna Cardinal had this problem, which later got addressed with slots in the stabilator. Greg Esres wrote: The Visitor wrote: To flare nice with full flaps invites a tail stall. Not likely. You will lose elevator authority, but the AOA gets smaller as the tail moves down. why there is the abundance of nose gear collapses in the type. Actually, there is an AD out on the Seneca nose gear. The collapses are generally due to misrigging of the airplane. Friend of mine has a nosewheel collapse after a full stall, nose high landing. Generally? I'm sorry about your friend and a misrigged gear on anything is a hazard. And the pa34 nose gear (like any) can be mis-rigged.But the seneca nose gears take a pounding because of the way they are flown. It leads to failures. John |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
No, and with full flaps it pull an greater aoa for the same
authority(down force). It stalls. And the nose can drop real hard. As the stab moves into ground effect the aoa increases also. Sorry, I was thinking of a horizontal stabilizer/elevator combo. Still, the lift coefficient of the horizontal tail most likely doesn't get near Clmax. I regularly make full stall landings with the Seneca using 40 degree flaps.The tail doesn't stall. If the nose drops, it's a physical strength issue. But the seneca nose gears take a pounding because of the way they are flown. It leads to failures. The British did a very elaborate analysis of the nose gear on the Seneca and didn't think that was a factor. The gear is designed to withstand vertical loads. It's front to back loads that are a problem. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Going for my Multiengine rating | Kobra | Piloting | 34 | October 10th 07 02:23 PM |
Going for my Multiengine rating | Kobra | Owning | 29 | October 10th 07 02:23 PM |
Going for my Multiengine rating | Kobra | Products | 3 | September 23rd 07 03:56 AM |
Multiengine Rating | [email protected] | Piloting | 79 | January 25th 07 06:58 PM |
rotorcraft commercial rating or better rating advice | Rick Cook | Rotorcraft | 0 | October 13th 03 04:49 PM |