A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Naval Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

The Osprey Goes to War



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 6th 07, 03:56 AM posted to rec.aviation.military,rec.aviation.military.naval,sci.military.naval
Bret Ludwig
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 138
Default The Osprey Goes to War


Again you lose the speed advantage , the only rationale for this one
trick pony

so that newcomers understand.

The ospreys speed advantage in horizontal flight is derived from
rotating the prop rotors to horizontal flight. However this put an
absolute maximum size on both the rotor and the cabin. Both are
inefficiently small The small "prop rotors" are inefficient in vertical
flight. They are far smaller than an efficient helicopter rotor driven
by the same horsepower. So the horsepower requirements are enormous for
the lift.

Because the horsepower requirements are enormous the osprey has the
Engines of a heavy lift helicopter and the cargo capabilities of a
medium lift helicopter.

The small rotors are driven faster which creates far greater down wash
as they land.

The tilt machinery and long drive shaft required to deal with engine
failure impose a permanent weight penalty. so weight control was critical.

The net result is that all of the "advantages" of the osprey only occur
at relatively long range. At short range it is inferior to a modern
helicopter in every possible way.

But the Cobra is not a long range aircraft It has a maximum payload of
about 3500 pounds of crew fuel and weapons. The more fuel loaded , the
less armament


Helos are by their nature not long range propositions.

The Osprey is a worst of both worlds proposition. It's pessimal.
Worse even than the Canadair tilt wing transports of the 60s.

Helos are poor escort platforms, unless some bizarre hover-fight is
envisioned. A WWII recip fighter would be a better escort.

Sadly, some politician's kid is going to have to die in a horrific
crash-along with thirty or so other people-before the Osprey is
euthanized.

  #2  
Old October 6th 07, 01:52 PM posted to rec.aviation.military,rec.aviation.military.naval,sci.military.naval
Richard Casady
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 47
Default The Osprey Goes to War

On Fri, 05 Oct 2007 09:33:26 -0400, Vince wrote:

American ground forces have not
gone to war without air superiority since, what, Korea? WWII?


The guys caught in the Pacific at the beginning of WWII didn't exactly
go to war, it came to them. What was the situation in the air when the
US troopsentered WWI?

Casady
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Osprey 2 modifications Terry Mortimore Home Built 5 October 23rd 04 11:46 PM
Osprey icing tests Ed Majden Military Aviation 0 February 1st 04 08:43 PM
Amphib: Coot vs Osprey II Greg Milligan Home Built 9 December 29th 03 01:48 AM
Osprey tested in air, at sea Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 December 10th 03 12:30 AM
Osprey vs. Harrier Stephen D. Poe Military Aviation 58 August 18th 03 03:17 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.