![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
es330td wrote:
In the email I got from AOPA ePilot training tips today there is a discussion of fuel starvation that makes regular mention of the fuel selector switch. All my flying is done in a CE172 and the first and last time I worry about the switch is during pre-flight when I confirm that it is on both. I fly on both and never fly any other way and to be honest, outside of gravity flow issues when parked on an incline I cannot think of why one would want to select one tank at a time vs both. Frankly, on a C-172 I can't think of any reason either. But different aircraft have different systems. As you move up the Cessna line you will find aircraft that don't offer the "both" option. None of the Pipers do. In fact, I can't think of a general aviation low wing aircraft I ever flew that offered "both" as an option. So in that situation you: 1. Take off and land on the fullest tank. 2. Switch tanks every 30 minutes to keep the aircraft from becoming heavy on one side. 3. If you have to manage both inboard and outboard tanks, I prefer to burn the outboards first so that the remaining fuel has less effect on balance. Of course, some aircraft require specific handling. On the C-402 for example, you had to burn a good 30 minutes on the outboards (which were its mains) before you could switch to the inboards. When you switched to the inboards, the fuel actually went from the inboards to the outboards to the engine. If you didn't make room first by burning the outboards first, the fuel pumped from the inboards would just be pushed through the overflow valves on the outboard tanks and then you get to sprinkle the landscape with expensive avgas. 4. Bottom line: read the manual and follow their directions. -- Mortimer Schnerd, RN mschnerdatcarolina.rr.com |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mortimer Schnerd, RN" mschnerdatcarolina.rr.com wrote in message ... Frankly, on a C-172 I can't think of any reason either. http://www.caa.is/datadir/bsdata/img...s/72-07-02.pdf Karl |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mortimer Schnerd, RN" mschnerdatcarolina.rr.com wrote in message ... On the C-402 for example, you had to burn a good 30 minutes on the outboards (which were its mains) before you could switch to the inboards. When you switched to the inboards, the fuel actually went from the inboards to the outboards to the engine. If you didn't make room first by burning the outboards first, the fuel pumped from the inboards would just be pushed through the overflow valves on the outboard tanks and then you get to sprinkle the landscape with expensive avgas. You got that partially right. The aux tanks each have their own electric fuel pump that pushes the fuel throught the selector valve and on to the engine driven fuel pump. Excess fuel from the engine driven fuel pump is routed back to the main (tip) tanks. The reason for running on the tip tanks first for 60 (or 90 for the large aux tanks) minutes is to make room for this bypass fuel. -- *H. Allen Smith* WACO - We are all here, because we are not all there. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Allen" wrote in message . .. "Mortimer Schnerd, RN" mschnerdatcarolina.rr.com wrote in message ... On the C-402 for example, you had to burn a good 30 minutes on the outboards (which were its mains) before you could switch to the inboards. When you switched to the inboards, the fuel actually went from the inboards to the outboards to the engine. If you didn't make room first by burning the outboards first, the fuel pumped from the inboards would just be pushed through the overflow valves on the outboard tanks and then you get to sprinkle the landscape with expensive avgas. You got that partially right. The aux tanks each have their own electric fuel pump that pushes the fuel throught the selector valve and on to the engine driven fuel pump. Excess fuel from the engine driven fuel pump is routed back to the main (tip) tanks. The reason for running on the tip tanks first for 60 (or 90 for the large aux tanks) minutes is to make room for this bypass fuel. -- *H. Allen Smith* WACO - We are all here, because we are not all there. Correct for the AUX tanks. However, the optional locker tanks function just like Mortimer said. Al G |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Allen wrote:
"Mortimer Schnerd, RN" mschnerdatcarolina.rr.com wrote in message ... On the C-402 for example, you had to burn a good 30 minutes on the outboards (which were its mains) before you could switch to the inboards. When you switched to the inboards, the fuel actually went from the inboards to the outboards to the engine. If you didn't make room first by burning the outboards first, the fuel pumped from the inboards would just be pushed through the overflow valves on the outboard tanks and then you get to sprinkle the landscape with expensive avgas. You got that partially right. The aux tanks each have their own electric fuel pump that pushes the fuel throught the selector valve and on to the engine driven fuel pump. Excess fuel from the engine driven fuel pump is routed back to the main (tip) tanks. The reason for running on the tip tanks first for 60 (or 90 for the large aux tanks) minutes is to make room for this bypass fuel. Oops... it's been a while. -- Mortimer Schnerd, RN mschnerdatcarolina.rr.com |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 5 Oct 2007 11:04:50 -0400, "Mortimer Schnerd, RN"
mschnerdatcarolina.rr.com wrote: Frankly, on a C-172 I can't think of any reason either. But different aircraft have different systems. As you move up the Cessna line you will find aircraft that don't offer the "both" option. None of the Pipers do. In fact, I can't think of a general aviation low wing aircraft I ever flew that offered "both" as an option. My Beech can't draw from both. I've been in Turboprop Cessna Grand Caravans (I know, not a 172) who would draw fuel from the left tank faster than the right tank, so the left would be shut off for periods of time to even the fuel. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On many Cessna 172s you are REQUIRED to run on either left or right (not
both) above 5000' Karl http://www.caa.is/datadir/bsdata/img...s/72-07-02.pdf "es330td" wrote in message ups.com... Sorry if this is dumb (I am only at 8.3 hours toward my PPL)... In the email I got from AOPA ePilot training tips today there is a discussion of fuel starvation that makes regular mention of the fuel selector switch. All my flying is done in a CE172 and the first and last time I worry about the switch is during pre-flight when I confirm that it is on both. I fly on both and never fly any other way and to be honest, outside of gravity flow issues when parked on an incline I cannot think of why one would want to select one tank at a time vs both. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 6, 4:25 am, "karl gruber" wrote:
On many Cessna 172s you are REQUIRED to run on either left or right (not both) above 5000' Karlhttp://www.caa.is/datadir/bsdata/img/adnotes/72-07-02.pdf Many cessna 172's? How many were not modified -I've not seen the required placard... Cheers |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 6, 12:47 am, es330td wrote:
Sorry if this is dumb (I am only at 8.3 hours toward my PPL)... In the email I got from AOPA ePilot training tips today there is a discussion of fuel starvation that makes regular mention of the fuel selector switch. All my flying is done in a CE172 and the first and last time I worry about the switch is during pre-flight when I confirm that it is on both. I fly on both and never fly any other way and to be honest, outside of gravity flow issues when parked on an incline I cannot think of why one would want to select one tank at a time vs both. If you ever get to a situation where you are worried about fuel, you switch to one tank and start your watch, when that tank runs dry (engine splutters) you will have a very good idea of how much flying time you have left. This knowlege will enable you to decide if your chosen alternate airfield is in reach or if you neeed to start your precautionary landing procedures (looking for a paddock etc.) Cheers |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Fuel line question | Lou | Home Built | 12 | October 9th 06 02:46 PM |
Fuel selector or two check valves? | Rob Turk | Home Built | 13 | July 1st 05 12:21 AM |
Fuel Question | Peterpan | Piloting | 5 | March 24th 05 03:49 AM |
Fuel Selector Valve | Tom Cummings | Owning | 1 | March 7th 04 02:44 PM |
Fuel Selector Valve | Jay | Home Built | 5 | November 15th 03 11:16 PM |