A Very Disturbing Story

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Mxsmanic wrote:
A Guy Called Tyketto writes:

So now you're saying that people should treat parents (both
mother, father, and/or legal guardians) of a child or children with
vigilance, hysteria, and paranoia.

No.

Parents should be treated with extreme vigilance, as they are the greatest
threat to their children. But there is no need for hysteria or paranoia, not
only with respect to parents, but with respect to everyone else.

Then following your logic, it would be deemed justifiable to be
vigilant towards your parents for conceiving you. I see now, and should
remind others to act as such should they ever find them.


You've blisfully cropped my second sentence to that paragraph,
which states: "Luckily for you, those men are men of character and are
above such things, and above you."

Men of character do not engage in violent acts against those with whom they
disagree.

Didn't I just say that? I say again, They are men of character
and _are above such things, and above you_ .

In simpler terms, they are better than you, just by being who
they are, and no matter how much you troll or call them out, they will
always be better men, better women, better PARENTS than you will ever
be or ever hope to be.

Judging from what you have mentioned, it is plain to see that
you are not a parent, nor have ever been a parent.

How might one go about validating your judgement?

Do your own damned research and come back to us with
substantiated proof. Until then, it is up to you to prove me wrong.

BL.
- --
Brad Littlejohn | Email:
Unix Systems Administrator, |
Web + NewsMaster, BOFH.. Smeghead! | http://www.wizard.com/~tyketto
PGP: 1024D/E319F0BF 6980 AAD6 7329 E9E6 D569 F620 C819 199A E319 F0BF

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHMBvnyBkZmuMZ8L8RAtMmAJ90eQL8XJJh77RQ0QgoRX ud25h8tgCfbIho
07o+Dp249DrZqiwOHt9TaD4=
=f+Fz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

A Guy Called Tyketto writes:

Then following your logic, it would be deemed justifiable to be
vigilant towards your parents for conceiving you.

No. Conceiving a child is not, in itself, any form of abuse.

However, it is important to remain vigilant about potential abuse by parents,
as it is extremely widespread, underreported, and rarely prosecuted.

Do your own damned research and come back to us with
substantiated proof.

Judgement is subjective by definition; it cannot be objectively proved.
Therefore there is any research that anyone can do to validate your judgement.
It is simply your opinion. What makes your opinion especially valuable?

Until then, it is up to you to prove me wrong.

See above. There are arguably good judgement and poor judgement, but no
judgement is provably right or wrong.

Would you provide credible evidence that your statement


However, it is important to remain vigilant about potential abuse by parents,
as it is extremely widespread, underreported, and rarely prosecuted.


is in any way valid?

I thought not.






Do your own damned research and come back to us with
substantiated proof.

Judgement is subjective by definition; it cannot be objectively proved.
Therefore there is any research that anyone can do to validate your judgement.
It is simply your opinion. What makes your opinion especially valuable?

Until then, it is up to you to prove me wrong.

See above. There are arguably good judgement and poor judgement, but no
judgement is provably right or wrong.

Mxsmanic wrote in
:

A Guy Called Tyketto writes:

Then following your logic, it would be deemed justifiable to be
vigilant towards your parents for conceiving you.

No. Conceiving a child is not, in itself, any form of abuse.

However, it is important to remain vigilant about potential abuse by
parents, as it is extremely widespread, underreported, and rarely
prosecuted.

Do your own damned research and come back to us with
substantiated proof.

Judgement is subjective by definition; it cannot be objectively
proved. Therefore there is any research that anyone can do to validate
your judgement. It is simply your opinion. What makes your opinion
especially valuable?

Until then, it is up to you to prove me wrong.

See above. There are arguably good judgement and poor judgement, but
no judgement is provably right or wrong.


You're an idiot.


Bertie

Mxsmanic wrote in
:

A Guy Called Tyketto writes:

So now you're saying that people should treat parents (both
mother, father, and/or legal guardians) of a child or children with
vigilance, hysteria, and paranoia.

No.

Parents should be treated with extreme vigilance, as they are the
greatest threat to their children. But there is no need for hysteria
or paranoia, not only with respect to parents, but with respect to
everyone else.

If that were the case, the same should have been done with
your parents regarding you.

Vigilance would be useful for all parents.

However, most parents are so rabidly and violently paranoid about
interference with their own child-rearing activity that they are
willing to let other parents beat and kill their own children with
impunity in order to preserve imaginary parental "rights." And so
abuse continues, and a great many of society's problems can be traced
directly to poor parenting.

It's ironic that the one area that affects the future of civilization
more than anything else is left utterly and completely to chance.

You've blisfully cropped my second sentence to that paragraph,
which states: "Luckily for you, those men are men of character and
are above such things, and above you."

Men of character do not engage in violent acts against those with whom
they disagree.

Judging from what you have mentioned, it is plain to see that
you are not a parent, nor have ever been a parent.

How might one go about validating your judgement?


One shold **** off and leave parenting to people who are capable of
reproduction.


Bertie

Mxsmanic wrote:
Nobody is more likely to abuse a child than his own parents..

Except for creepy guys that move to France, have no job and are anti-social.

Gig 601XL Builder writes:

Except for creepy guys that move to France, have no job and are anti-social.

Even they are not as likely to abuse children as are the parents of those
children.

Mxsmanic wrote in
:

Gig 601XL Builder writes:

Except for creepy guys that move to France, have no job and are
anti-social.

Even they are not as likely to abuse children as are the parents of
those children.





Only because they run screaming when they see you coming,

Bertie

"Gig 601XL Builder" wrDOTgiaconaATsuddenlink.net wrote in message
...
Mxsmanic wrote:
Nobody is more likely to abuse a child than his own parents..

Except for creepy guys that move to France, have no job and are
anti-social.
Um, Gig? MX (for once) is right; the overwhelming majority of abuse cases
are parental, though far more often they're step-parent.

Matt W. Barrow wrote:
"Gig 601XL Builder" wrDOTgiaconaATsuddenlink.net wrote in message
...
Mxsmanic wrote:
Nobody is more likely to abuse a child than his own parents..

Except for creepy guys that move to France, have no job and are
anti-social.
Um, Gig? MX (for once) is right; the overwhelming majority of abuse
cases are parental, though far more often they're step-parent.

Well of course they are. But there are more reasons than concern about abuse
to keep your kids away from guys like MX.