$98 per barrel oil

Matt Whiting wrote in news:dAK_i.804$2n4.24532
@news1.epix.net:

Jay Honeck wrote:
What is your theory as to why we did this? I can think of a few, but
I'm not sure which are truly valid in the final analysis.

Uh, Matt -- reality check he You're asking a troll who specializes
in lame, one-sentence insults to provide thoughtful analysis of a
complex socio-economic and geopolitical question that has occupiedj --
and will continue to occupy -- historians and scholars for decades.

Good luck.

Entertainment, Jay, entertainment! You just have to have the right
expectations. :-)


Yeah, you got me there. You adopt a troglidyte political position in the
hop of snagging lefties.



You're a master troll. I bow at your feet.


Bertie

On Nov 14, 9:50 am, Jay Honeck wrote:

Uh, Matt -- reality check he You're asking a troll who specializes
in lame, one-sentence insults Good luck.

"Your Aviation Destination"

Uh, Jay-- reality check here; we all have to endure all of your
racially and politically charged OT posts, what kind of car you want
to drive, every time your kid takes a flying lesson, advertising your
business on Usnet, etc. You are probably one of the last people who
should be questioning a poster's motivation.
KFB

F.,

Thanks for making me feel less alone.

And yes, I admit to being guilty of engaging in the OT posts, which is
a mistake. I'll try to work on it.

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)

On 2007-11-15, F. Baum wrote:
every time your kid takes a flying lesson

That, at least, is entirely on topic for rec.aviation.piloting :-)

--
From the sunny Isle of Man.
Yes, the Reply-To email address is valid.

"Dylan Smith" wrote in message
...
On 2007-11-15, F. Baum wrote:
every time your kid takes a flying lesson

That, at least, is entirely on topic for rec.aviation.piloting :-)

And how present "world affairs" equates to $100 oil if not through
historical perspective

F. Baum schrieb:

Uh, Jay-- reality check here; we all have to endure all of your
racially and politically charged OT posts, what kind of car you want
to drive, every time your kid takes a flying lesson, advertising your
business on Usnet, etc. You are probably one of the last people who
should be questioning a poster's motivation.
KFB

I agree with you here - except that the posts on the flying lessons of
his son are on topic.

But he will come up and will say that out of his bazillion posts he also
had some on topic posts and that you and me are nothing and that we had
to proof our right to post here and that he is everything.

#m
--
I am not a terrorist http://www.casualdisobedience.com/

Jay,

-- why did we
bother?


That one is really easy to answer. Try reading a history book or two.
You'll be amazed.

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)

Thomas Borchert wrote:
Jay,

-- why did we
bother?


That one is really easy to answer. Try reading a history book or two.
You'll be amazed.


I don't think there is any universal consensus on this topic.

Matt

Matt Whiting wrote in news1p_i.782$2n4.24373
@news1.epix.net:

Thomas Borchert wrote:
Jay,

-- why did we
bother?


That one is really easy to answer. Try reading a history book or two.
You'll be amazed.


I don't think there is any universal consensus on this topic.



You're right, there isn't.


So why bother looking around, eh?


Bertie

-- why did we
bother?

That one is really easy to answer. Try reading a history book or two.
You'll be amazed.

I don't think there is any universal consensus on this topic.

Thomas' reality won't accept that option, Matt. It would shatter his
view of the world.

History is fluid. We may yet wake up to discover that the
isolationists prior to World War II (of which Charles Lindbergh was a
prominent member -- necessary aviation content) were *right*...
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"