$98 per barrel oil

Jay,

Thomas' reality won't accept that option, Matt.

You have enough to worry about with yours, don't bother with mine.

It would shatter his
view of the world.

Actually, IMHO, your view of the world definitely needs some
shattering.

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)

Thomas Borchert wrote in
:

Jay,

Thomas' reality won't accept that option, Matt.

You have enough to worry about with yours, don't bother with mine.

It would shatter his
view of the world.

Actually, IMHO, your view of the world definitely needs some
shattering.


I think it's ben shonw that even that doesn't work.

Bertie

Matt,

I don't think there is any universal consensus on this topic.


I agree. However, the number of serious historians agreeing with Jay's
view of things is really, really small.

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)

Thomas Borchert wrote in
:

Matt,

I don't think there is any universal consensus on this topic.


I agree. However, the number of serious historians agreeing with Jay's
view of things is really, really small.


Fox news, OTOH....



Bertie

Bertie,

Fox news, OTOH....


I believe the correct spelling is: Fox "news".

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)

Thomas Borchert wrote in
:

Bertie,

Fox news, OTOH....


I believe the correct spelling is: Fox "news".


Are those inverted?

Bertie

Thomas Borchert wrote:
Bertie,

Fox news, OTOH....


I believe the correct spelling is: Fox "news".

Actually, it's "Faux News."

I don't think there is any universal consensus on this topic.

I agree. However, the number of serious historians agreeing with Jay's
view of things is really, really small.

To which view are you referring?

If you're talking about the fact that you'd probably be speaking
Russian without American intervention on Europe's behalf from 1946
through 1990, you'll have a hard time finding a legitimate historian
who would contradict me.
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"

Jay Honeck wrote in news:d431b036-54a3-490f-a671-
:

I don't think there is any universal consensus on this topic.

I agree. However, the number of serious historians agreeing with Jay's
view of things is really, really small.

To which view are you referring?

If you're talking about the fact that you'd probably be speaking
Russian without American intervention on Europe's behalf from 1946
through 1990, you'll have a hard time finding a legitimate historian
who would contradict me.



Really?


The Poles didn't speak Russian. The Czechs didn't, the east germans didn't,
the Lithuanians didn't, the Magyars didn't, the Rumanians didn't....

OTOH you're speaking a *******ised, gutteral, german dialect that was
shoved down the necks of half the planet by the Brits at the point of a
blade and is being shoved down the rest of the planets neck via t-shirts
and McDonalds.


Bertie

The Poles didn't speak Russian. The Czechs didn't, the east germans didn't,
the Lithuanians didn't, the Magyars didn't, the Rumanians didn't....

Gosh, Bertie -- I *know* you're a proud troll, but couldn't you just
once pretend to catch the drift of something without being
bludgeoned?

*sigh* I suppose not.

"Speaking Russian" is a euphemism for "Being in the sphere of the
Soviet Union." In the old days we would have used Churchill's more
flowery prose, and called it "Behind the Iron Curtain"...
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"