![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2007-11-30 15:34:15 -0800, WJRFlyBoy said:
On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 13:18:26 -0800, Gatt wrote: Cessna have obviously done thier homework, they have weighed the pros and cons, and at the end of the day, the most effective solution presented itself. The most effective solution being the use of slave labor and not having to comply with any environmental laws? No wonder things are cheaper when manufactured in China! Exactly. If you just: don't pay your employees anything; lie about using, say, toxic paint; pirate, copy or steal other people's technology and; kill anybody who speaks out in dissent, you can save a lot of money. Money, at the end of the day, is all that matters to most people. -c All true. All could be said of the USA a century ago. Then, perhaps in a century, China will be worth doing business with. Until then, why should I be expected to buy a Cessna when the money from that transaction will go to bullets with our soldiers' names on them? -- Waddling Eagle World Famous Flight Instructor |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 16:36:19 -0800 (PST), James Sleeman wrote:
Do you honestly think that CESSNA is going to stake thier name, reputation, and conceivably risk the entire business by going with an aircraft manufacturer who would produce shoddy unreliable or dangerous aircraft?! More so, do you honestly think that either Cessna OR your country's respective aviation authorities are going to let obviously shoddy unreliable or dangerous aircraft get anywhere near the hands of Joe Bloggs the pilot?! Please, at least show some common sense here. Cessna have obviously done thier homework, they have weighed the pros and cons, and at the end of the day, the most effective solution presented itself. The anti-Chinese backlash here isn't surprising, it's probably more anti-anythingoverseas and that's understandable. But it is the ebb-flow of international economics and the USA certainly has had its share of that upside in the past. No, Cessna damn well knows what they are doing and even if it is a calculated risk, hey can survive it but they might less well survive their competition beating them to this Chinese punch. -- Remove numbers for gmail and for God's sake it ain't "gee" either! |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Darkwing" theducksmail"AT"yahoo.com wrote in message ... Building it in China, OH JOY! I would think this would be a negative. http://www.avweb.com/avwebflash/news..._196672-1.html Cessna has chosen the Chinese-government owned Shenyang Aircraft Corp. to build the Model 162 Skycatcher. Earlier this week, Cessna announced it would be building the Light Sport Aircraft offshore. In a news release, Cessna CEO Jack Pelton said the company needed top quality at a competitive price and SAC put it all together. "Our solution is to partner with SAC, a company with excellent facilities, state-of-the-art technologies and a workforce highly experienced in aircraft manufacturing. SkyCatcher customers will get an advanced design, high-quality workmanship and world-class product support, all at an affordable price from Cessna, a brand known and trusted worldwide." The move, coupled with Cessna's acquisition of Columbia Aircraft has dominated Cessna's profile in recent months as it continues to pile up record sales for its business jets. Cool, you will be able to get replacement parts in the mower department at Wal Mart. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Darkwing" theducksmail"AT"yahoo.com wrote in message ... Building it in China, OH JOY! I would think this would be a negative. I have seen some pretty damn good airframes that were built in third world countries. Plus, it is going to be supported by Cessna. Don't knock it until you have seen it. Vaughn |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My concern, aside from the lack of jobs in Kansas, is weight. The LSA must
be light and lead paint is heavy. "Vaughn Simon" wrote in message ... | | "Darkwing" theducksmail"AT"yahoo.com wrote in message | ... | Building it in China, OH JOY! I would think this would be a negative. | | | I have seen some pretty damn good airframes that were built in third world | countries. Plus, it is going to be supported by Cessna. Don't knock it until | you have seen it. | | Vaughn | | |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() There goes my respect for Cessna. -c |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Cessna To Build Skycatcher Overseas Despite Cheap Dollar | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 22 | November 29th 07 01:04 AM |
Skycatcher IFR? | Matt Whiting | Owning | 57 | November 26th 07 11:59 PM |
Skycatcher to be a import. | Gig 601XL Builder | Piloting | 0 | November 26th 07 05:01 PM |
Cessna's new LSA: "Skycatcher" | Jim Logajan | Piloting | 107 | September 23rd 07 01:18 AM |
Cessna's new LSA: "Skycatcher" | miffich | Piloting | 1 | July 24th 07 12:04 AM |