A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

RIP Cessna...Skycatcher



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 29th 07, 04:39 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 83
Default RIP Cessna...Skycatcher

We are giving our country away and elevating a communist super power with
some of the largest human rights abuse issues in the world. They're taking
our money and making missiles, aircraft and guns to sell to our enemies
while they tolerate software, music and movie piracy. If you dissent you
disappear.


So.... basically all the corporate executives who are making these
decisions to outsource to China are in a sense committing a long,
slow, drawn-out act of treason in return for profit, eh?
  #3  
Old November 29th 07, 05:02 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Gatt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 179
Default RIP Cessna...Skycatcher


wrote in message
...

So.... basically all the corporate executives who are making these
decisions to outsource to China are in a sense committing a long,
slow, drawn-out act of treason in return for profit, eh?


Well, I'd say that commission has been happening for awhile.

China has some of the worst human rights records in the world. Hey, let's
all empower China. With a track record like that, they NEED to be a rival
superpower.

-c


  #5  
Old November 29th 07, 06:14 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
C J Campbell[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 799
Default RIP Cessna...Skycatcher

On 2007-11-28 16:36:19 -0800, James Sleeman said:

Come on people, usually I give pilots some accepted base line of
intelligence and reasoning, but it seems it's largely gone out the
window on this one. Chinese manufacturers of CONSUMER products have
had more than thier fair share of problems to be sure, but it's a hell
of a stretch to compare consumer products with aircraft manufacture.


The LSA is a consumer product.


Do you honestly think that CESSNA is going to stake thier name,
reputation, and conceivably risk the entire business by going with an
aircraft manufacturer who would produce shoddy unreliable or dangerous
aircraft?!


Yep.


More so, do you honestly think that either Cessna OR your country's
respective aviation authorities are going to let obviously shoddy
unreliable or dangerous aircraft get anywhere near the hands of Joe
Bloggs the pilot?!


Yep.


Please, at least show some common sense here.


What makes you think that aircraft manufacturers or government
regulators will suddenly start doing any better than they have in the
past?


Cessna have obviously done thier homework, they have weighed the pros
and cons, and at the end of the day, the most effective solution
presented itself.

To decry the aircraft on the sole fact that it will be constructed in
China simply smacks of xenophobia. If you have a criticism of the
aircraft, at least make it something worth criticising!


I think that the fact that the aircraft will be made in a country that
is hostile the United States, whose military leaders have publicly
threatened to use nuclear weapons on our forces, which has possibly the
worst environmental record in history, uses slave labor, supplies arms
and advice to terrorists, has the worst reputation for patent and
copyright piracy, launders counterfeit American currency for the North
Koreans, has shown callous disregard for consumer safety in its
industrial standards, and has a horrible human rights record is
something worth criticizing.

Frankly, Cessna would have done better to have let the contract out to
Satan himself.

--
Waddling Eagle
World Famous Flight Instructor

  #6  
Old November 29th 07, 06:52 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Gatt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 179
Default RIP Cessna...Skycatcher


"C J Campbell" wrote in message
news:2007112910141116807-

To decry the aircraft on the sole fact that it will be constructed in
China simply smacks of xenophobia.


I think that the fact that the aircraft will be made in a country that is
hostile the United States, whose military leaders have publicly threatened
to use nuclear weapons on our forces, which has possibly the worst
environmental record in history, uses slave labor, supplies arms and
advice to terrorists, has the worst reputation for patent and copyright
piracy, launders counterfeit American currency for the North Koreans,
has shown callous disregard for consumer safety in its industrial
standards, and has a horrible human rights record is something worth
criticizing.


Nicely stated.

Do they still abandon baby girls on the side of rivers or eat engangered
tiger penises to give themselves a hard-on? Do they still imprison
political dissidents, spy on their own people or censor the media?

Xenophobia? They're no better than the Soviet Union. At least the USSR
helped win World War II.

Last week I went to the mall looking for work shoes, and literally -every-
pair I looked at was made in China. The last pair I bought there lasted
about six months, but that's not why I didn't buy Chinese shoes this time.
I went home, dug out my old circa-1988 Marine Corps GI work boots, put a
coat of polish on them and that's what I've been wearing all week. Made in
America. They're not pretty but I know they weren't made in some communist
sweatshop.

-c


  #7  
Old November 29th 07, 07:21 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Gig 601XL Builder
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,317
Default RIP Cessna...Skycatcher

Gatt wrote:


Do they still abandon baby girls on the side of rivers...


Only the ones that are lucky or not lucky to be born in the first place.


  #8  
Old November 29th 07, 07:22 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
C J Campbell[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 799
Default RIP Cessna...Skycatcher

On 2007-11-28 16:36:19 -0800, James Sleeman said:


Cessna have obviously done thier homework, they have weighed the pros
and cons, and at the end of the day, the most effective solution
presented itself.



The most effective solution being the use of slave labor and not having
to comply with any environmental laws? No wonder things are cheaper
when manufactured in China!
--
Waddling Eagle
World Famous Flight Instructor

  #9  
Old November 29th 07, 09:18 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Gatt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 179
Default RIP Cessna...Skycatcher


"C J Campbell" wrote in message
news:2007112911225837709-christophercampbell@hotmailcom...
On 2007-11-28 16:36:19 -0800, James Sleeman said:


Cessna have obviously done thier homework, they have weighed the pros
and cons, and at the end of the day, the most effective solution
presented itself.


The most effective solution being the use of slave labor and not having to
comply with any environmental laws? No wonder things are cheaper when
manufactured in China!


Exactly. If you just: don't pay your employees anything; lie about using,
say, toxic paint; pirate, copy or steal other people's technology and; kill
anybody who speaks out in dissent, you can save a lot of money.

Money, at the end of the day, is all that matters to most people.

-c


  #10  
Old November 29th 07, 10:26 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Matt W. Barrow
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 427
Default RIP Cessna...Skycatcher


"Gatt" wrote in message
...

"C J Campbell" wrote in message
news:2007112911225837709-christophercampbell@hotmailcom...

The most effective solution being the use of slave labor and not having
to comply with any environmental laws? No wonder things are cheaper when
manufactured in China!


Exactly. If you just: don't pay your employees anything; lie about using,
say, toxic paint; pirate, copy or steal other people's technology and;
kill anybody who speaks out in dissent, you can save a lot of money.

Money, at the end of the day, is all that matters to most people.



At least money in the short-term.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Cessna To Build Skycatcher Overseas Despite Cheap Dollar Larry Dighera Piloting 22 November 29th 07 01:04 AM
Skycatcher IFR? Matt Whiting Owning 57 November 26th 07 11:59 PM
Skycatcher to be a import. Gig 601XL Builder Piloting 0 November 26th 07 05:01 PM
Cessna's new LSA: "Skycatcher" Jim Logajan Piloting 107 September 23rd 07 01:18 AM
Cessna's new LSA: "Skycatcher" miffich Piloting 1 July 24th 07 12:04 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.