A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

RIP Cirrus



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 30th 07, 06:13 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Gatt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 179
Default RIP Cirrus


"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message
.. .

For a few. The rest--the people who made Cessna what it was by
Actually Making the Cessnas--will have a hard time enjoying Cessna's
"profits."


So don't buy one.

Easy, see?


In what way is Americans not buying things good for the US economy? It would
be better all around if I bought a Cessna that was built in Wichita instead
of not buying one that was made in China.

Meanwhile, they're reporting record profits for domestic production...not
during production in China, but during the last two years. With a crisis
like that it's no wonder they're moving to a communist state with shoddy
quality control, unethical business practices, massive human rights
violations and near-slave labor.

Once those folks in Kansas are laid off, none of them will be buying Cessnas
either. Not exactly Mr. Ford's business model. And you know the Chinese
workers going to buy them either. 'Course, the French might, what with the
value of the Euro over the dollar. It'll be interesting to hear from them
about how the Skycatcher handles, because I'll probably never fly one.

-c


  #2  
Old November 29th 07, 10:50 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Gatt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 179
Default RIP Cirrus


"Rich Ahrens" wrote in message
ouse.com...

"No way am I buying any aeroplane built by them heathen Chinee..."


F'ck the Chinese. I don't care if people call it xenophobic. They're
environment-trashing, human-rights-violating, child-abandoning,
dissident-imprisoning communists who sell weapons to our enemies and block
their population from accessing the truth about the world and their
government.

Xenophobic? What are the chances of the Dalai Lama dropping in to watch the
Olympics without disappearing?

It's not phobic to say that China is our ideological enemy. But I -could-
be phobic, because anybody who has nuclear weapons pointed at my home or
tries to steal our military technology is my enemy.

-c


  #3  
Old November 30th 07, 03:04 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Rich Ahrens[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 404
Default RIP Cirrus

Gatt wrote:
"Rich Ahrens" wrote in message
ouse.com...

"No way am I buying any aeroplane built by them heathen Chinee..."


F'ck the Chinese. I don't care if people call it xenophobic. They're
environment-trashing, human-rights-violating, child-abandoning,
dissident-imprisoning communists who sell weapons to our enemies and block
their population from accessing the truth about the world and their
government.


Sound like ideal allies and trading partners then - certainly we have or
have had plenty of other allies guilty of all the above.

Xenophobic? What are the chances of the Dalai Lama dropping in to watch the
Olympics without disappearing?

It's not phobic to say that China is our ideological enemy. But I -could-
be phobic, because anybody who has nuclear weapons pointed at my home or
tries to steal our military technology is my enemy.


Thank you for demonstrating my point.
  #4  
Old November 30th 07, 04:19 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 684
Default RIP Cirrus

On Nov 29, 8:04 pm, Rich Ahrens wrote:
Gatt wrote:
"Rich Ahrens" wrote in message
house.com...


"No way am I buying any aeroplane built by them heathen Chinee..."


F'ck the Chinese. I don't care if people call it xenophobic. They're
environment-trashing, human-rights-violating, child-abandoning,
dissident-imprisoning communists who sell weapons to our enemies and block
their population from accessing the truth about the world and their
government.


Sound like ideal allies and trading partners then - certainly we have or
have had plenty of other allies guilty of all the above.

Xenophobic? What are the chances of the Dalai Lama dropping in to watch the
Olympics without disappearing?


It's not phobic to say that China is our ideological enemy. But I -could-
be phobic, because anybody who has nuclear weapons pointed at my home or
tries to steal our military technology is my enemy.


Thank you for demonstrating my point.


You have no point. Gatt is 100% correct. Placating the Chinese with
trade won't last. Eventually, they will exercise their military. I
am expecting them to invade Siberia in an effort to expand their
territory and gain access to more natural resources. How do you say
"Liebensraum" in Chinese?
  #5  
Old November 30th 07, 04:28 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Bertie the Bunyip[_19_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,851
Default RIP Cirrus

wrote in
:

On Nov 29, 8:04 pm, Rich Ahrens wrote:
Gatt wrote:
"Rich Ahrens" wrote in message
house.com...


"No way am I buying any aeroplane built by them heathen Chinee..."


F'ck the Chinese. I don't care if people call it xenophobic.
They're environment-trashing, human-rights-violating,
child-abandoning, dissident-imprisoning communists who sell weapons
to our enemies and block their population from accessing the truth
about the world and their government.


Sound like ideal allies and trading partners then - certainly we have
or have had plenty of other allies guilty of all the above.

Xenophobic? What are the chances of the Dalai Lama dropping in to
watch the Olympics without disappearing?


It's not phobic to say that China is our ideological enemy. But I
-could- be phobic, because anybody who has nuclear weapons pointed
at my home or tries to steal our military technology is my enemy.


Thank you for demonstrating my point.


You have no point. Gatt is 100% correct. Placating the Chinese with
trade won't last. Eventually, they will exercise their military. I
am expecting them to invade Siberia in an effort to expand their
territory and gain access to more natural resources. How do you say
"Liebensraum" in Chinese?


Well, you say it as Lebensraum in German, for starters.


Bertie

  #6  
Old November 30th 07, 06:35 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 684
Default RIP Cirrus

On Nov 30, 9:28 am, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
wrote :





On Nov 29, 8:04 pm, Rich Ahrens wrote:
Gatt wrote:
"Rich Ahrens" wrote in message
house.com...


"No way am I buying any aeroplane built by them heathen Chinee..."


F'ck the Chinese. I don't care if people call it xenophobic.
They're environment-trashing, human-rights-violating,
child-abandoning, dissident-imprisoning communists who sell weapons
to our enemies and block their population from accessing the truth
about the world and their government.


Sound like ideal allies and trading partners then - certainly we have
or have had plenty of other allies guilty of all the above.


Xenophobic? What are the chances of the Dalai Lama dropping in to
watch the Olympics without disappearing?


It's not phobic to say that China is our ideological enemy. But I
-could- be phobic, because anybody who has nuclear weapons pointed
at my home or tries to steal our military technology is my enemy.


Thank you for demonstrating my point.


You have no point. Gatt is 100% correct. Placating the Chinese with
trade won't last. Eventually, they will exercise their military. I
am expecting them to invade Siberia in an effort to expand their
territory and gain access to more natural resources. How do you say
"Liebensraum" in Chinese?


Well, you say it as Lebensraum in German, for starters.

Bertie- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Thanks for the spelling check...
  #7  
Old November 30th 07, 11:25 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Rich Ahrens[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 404
Default RIP Cirrus

Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
wrote in
:

On Nov 29, 8:04 pm, Rich Ahrens wrote:
Gatt wrote:
"Rich Ahrens" wrote in message
ouse.com...
"No way am I buying any aeroplane built by them heathen Chinee..."
F'ck the Chinese. I don't care if people call it xenophobic.
They're environment-trashing, human-rights-violating,
child-abandoning, dissident-imprisoning communists who sell weapons
to our enemies and block their population from accessing the truth
about the world and their government.
Sound like ideal allies and trading partners then - certainly we have
or have had plenty of other allies guilty of all the above.

Xenophobic? What are the chances of the Dalai Lama dropping in to
watch the Olympics without disappearing?
It's not phobic to say that China is our ideological enemy. But I
-could- be phobic, because anybody who has nuclear weapons pointed
at my home or tries to steal our military technology is my enemy.
Thank you for demonstrating my point.

You have no point. Gatt is 100% correct. Placating the Chinese with
trade won't last. Eventually, they will exercise their military. I
am expecting them to invade Siberia in an effort to expand their
territory and gain access to more natural resources. How do you say
"Liebensraum" in Chinese?


Well, you say it as Lebensraum in German, for starters.


I'm guessing he had an old B-52s tune playing in his head...

"tin roof...rusted!"
  #9  
Old November 30th 07, 05:07 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Gatt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 179
Default RIP Cirrus


"Rich Ahrens" wrote in message
ouse.com...

"No way am I buying any aeroplane built by them heathen Chinee..."


F'ck the Chinese. I don't care if people call it xenophobic. They're
environment-trashing, human-rights-violating, child-abandoning,
dissident-imprisoning communists who sell weapons to our enemies and
block their population from accessing the truth about the world and their
government.


Sound like ideal allies and trading partners then - certainly we have or
have had plenty of other allies guilty of all the above.


Not nearly on the scale of China. Of course, we should avoid business with
any of those nations. (Like Saudi Arabia or Sudan.)

Xenophobic? What are the chances of the Dalai Lama dropping in to watch
the Olympics without disappearing?

It's not phobic to say that China is our ideological enemy. But
I -could- be phobic, because anybody who has nuclear weapons pointed at
my home or tries to steal our military technology is my enemy.


Thank you for demonstrating my point.


Sorry. You're incorrect. It's not xenophobic to call an enemy government the
enemy. I'm not xenophobic for thinking Fidel Castro is a jackass either.
Both governments, coincidentially, have some of the worst media and free
speech censorship on earth. I have no moral qualms whatsoever about
criticizing their governments for what they are.

Fortunately, everywhere except for places like China and Cuba, we don't go
to prison for speaking out against them. There, we would. Wouldn't we?

-c


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Is this yet another Cirrus Gig 601XL Builder Piloting 11 January 27th 06 05:34 AM
Another Cirrus Down DA40 Owner Piloting 14 January 12th 06 05:45 PM
Another Cirrus Down Robert M. Gary Piloting 16 January 7th 06 12:33 AM
Another Cirrus Down Roger Piloting 0 December 15th 05 09:16 AM
Another Cirrus Down cjcampbell Piloting 0 December 13th 05 05:50 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.