russia vs. japan in 1941 [WAS: 50% of NAZI oil..]

"Cub Driver" wrote in message
...

The Japanese treated their enemies badly, but hey! so did the
Americans.


Different eras. During WWII the Americans treated their enemy captives far
better than the Japanese treated their enemy captives.

Different eras. During WWII the Americans treated their enemy captives far
better than the Japanese treated their enemy captives.

(Or than the Japanese treated their own soldiers, for that matter!)

all the best -- Dan Ford
email:

see the Warbird's Forum at www.warbirdforum.com
and the Piper Cub Forum at www.pipercubforum.com

In article ,
says...

The book title, by the way, is Flyboys: A True Story of Courage, by
James Bradley. After initially being put off by the moral equivalence
(oh sure, the Japanese murdered, cooked, and ate bits of seven
American fliers off Chichi Jima, but hey! Americans behaved badly at
the Battle of Wounded Knee!), I've decided it's worth the read.

There were Japanese soldiers at Wounded Knee ?

No, there were American soldiers.

The Japanese treated their enemies badly, but hey! so did the
Americans. (Mind you, I have not yet read the book. The moral
equivalance of Chichi Jima and Wounded Knee was pointed out by a
reviewer.)


Ok, I get the connection now.

You will find this sort of equivalance in most people edcuated after
say 1980. It was famously express by a high-school student who wrote
that the Americans dropped an atomic bomb on Hiroshima, so the
Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor.

I get to deal with this as I have two in HS right now. Fortunatly they
learned to read ata young age and have access to my small library plus
knwo how to use the public library...




--
When dealing with propaganda terminology one sometimes always speaks in
variable absolutes. This is not to be mistaken for an unbiased slant.