![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Paul J. Adam" wrote: In message , Chad Irby writes You should remember, though, that the Eurofighter's design is over twenty years old. As is the F-22 - is *that* obsolete? The actual F-22 design we see now is really only about ten years old, due to fairly complete revamps of the program along the way. They took a long time getting to initial designs, but ti's those designs you have to compare. The Eurofighter is pretty much the same design (plus some avionics and materials changes) as the late-1970s initial requirement. -- cirby at cfl.rr.com Remember: Objects in rearview mirror may be hallucinations. Slam on brakes accordingly. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Chad Irby
writes In article , "Paul J. Adam" wrote: In message , Chad Irby writes You should remember, though, that the Eurofighter's design is over twenty years old. As is the F-22 - is *that* obsolete? The actual F-22 design we see now is really only about ten years old, due to fairly complete revamps of the program along the way. One of the reasons the Eurofighter's late is... significant changes to the original design, as newer technologies came along (the RCS reduction program being one example). They took a long time getting to initial designs, but ti's those designs you have to compare. The Eurofighter is pretty much the same design (plus some avionics and materials changes) as the late-1970s initial requirement. Sorry, but that last is no more true than that the F-22 that enters service is just a productionised YF-22. -- When you have to kill a man, it costs nothing to be polite. W S Churchill Paul J. Adam MainBoxatjrwlynch[dot]demon{dot}co(.)uk |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Chad Irby" wrote in message
om... In article , "Paul J. Adam" wrote: In message , Chad Irby writes In article , "Paul J. Adam" wrote: If that were true, then we'd have binned Eurofighter in 1994 and leased F-16s instead. Seriously examined and pushed quite hard. ...and bought for a small advantage, for (at least in part) political reasons. No, because it would be significantly less capable for not much less money. The F-16 is a provably superb aircraft but its design is thirty years old and it's running out of growth room. You should remember, though, that the Eurofighter's design is over twenty years old. That's not true. Twenty years ago we had the Anglo-French EFA flying around, but that wasn't a Eurofighter. The Eurofighter was planned to fly in 1992, and to enter squadron service in 1999. The final design for production aircraft was actually frozen only four years ago. Matt |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!! __________-+__ ihuvpe | Chris | Instrument Flight Rules | 43 | December 19th 04 09:40 PM |
About French cowards. | Michael Smith | Military Aviation | 45 | October 22nd 03 03:15 PM |
Ungrateful Americans Unworthy of the French | The Black Monk | Military Aviation | 62 | October 16th 03 08:05 AM |
American planes are crap! | Peter Mollror | Military Aviation | 20 | October 7th 03 06:33 PM |
Conspiracy Theorists (amusing) | Grantland | Military Aviation | 1 | October 2nd 03 12:17 AM |