radiocomm question

On Mar 11, 2:03*pm, "Bob Gardner" wrote:
This information, taken from the Air Traffic Control Handbook, may be
useful:

Again, since it sounds like we're talking about a local procedure
you'd have to get a copy of that.

-Robert

On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 15:31:50 -0700 (PDT), "Robert M. Gary"
wrote in
:

On Mar 11, 2:03*pm, "Bob Gardner" wrote:
This information, taken from the Air Traffic Control Handbook, may be
useful:

Again, since it sounds like we're talking about a local procedure
you'd have to get a copy of that.

-Robert


That would be useful information. Has anyone bothered to consult the
references in this note:

NOTE-
Exceptions may be authorized only as provided in para 1-1-10,
Constraints Governing Supplements and Procedural Deviations, and
FAAO 7210.3, Facility Operation and Administration, Use of Active
Runways, para 10-1-7, where justified by extraordinary
circumstances at specific locations.

I did, and found nothing on point except dealing with crossing the active
runway. In the OPs case, they were not crossing the active.

Bob Gardner

"Larry Dighera" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 15:31:50 -0700 (PDT), "Robert M. Gary"
wrote in
:

On Mar 11, 2:03 pm, "Bob Gardner" wrote:
This information, taken from the Air Traffic Control Handbook, may be
useful:

Again, since it sounds like we're talking about a local procedure
you'd have to get a copy of that.

-Robert


That would be useful information. Has anyone bothered to consult the
references in this note:

NOTE-
Exceptions may be authorized only as provided in para 1-1-10,
Constraints Governing Supplements and Procedural Deviations, and
FAAO 7210.3, Facility Operation and Administration, Use of Active
Runways, para 10-1-7, where justified by extraordinary
circumstances at specific locations.

Bob Gardner wrote:
I did, and found nothing on point except dealing with crossing the active
runway. In the OPs case, they were not crossing the active.

They weren't crossing the runway they were going to depart on, but they
were certainly crossing an active runway. Runway 14 is never used for
landing (somebody told me it would scare the guys in the tower to have
planes get that close to them.) Small planes are often sent to land on
32 as to avoid interfering with commercial traffic on the longer parallel
runways. I remember the first time I was sent to take off on 14. I was
like, "One Four? What the heck is One Four?" You'd also never be sent
to depart from 32.


Bob Gardner

"Larry Dighera" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 15:31:50 -0700 (PDT), "Robert M. Gary"
wrote in
:

On Mar 11, 2:03 pm, "Bob Gardner" wrote:
This information, taken from the Air Traffic Control Handbook, may be
useful:

Again, since it sounds like we're talking about a local procedure
you'd have to get a copy of that.

-Robert


That would be useful information. Has anyone bothered to consult the
references in this note:

NOTE-
Exceptions may be authorized only as provided in para 1-1-10,
Constraints Governing Supplements and Procedural Deviations, and
FAAO 7210.3, Facility Operation and Administration, Use of Active
Runways, para 10-1-7, where justified by extraordinary
circumstances at specific locations.


--
Don Poitras

On Mar 11, 5:31*pm, "Robert M. Gary" wrote:

Again, since it sounds like we're talking about a local procedure
you'd have to get a copy of that.


There are no local procedures at RDU or ABQ that deviate from the
national standards in this area.