![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay Honeck schrieb:
An interesting question to ponder: At what price point do the masses rise up and over-ride the environmentalist rules that currently restrict the process? whatever the price is: what will mankind do after that? you're only moving the finding of a solution to later generations. So....you're saying we should not look for more oil? haven't said that. but oil is a finite ressource (whenever you believe this will be). We can all make our economy more healthy if it does not solely run on oil. Move the pain up sooner? Leave the oil in the ground and force the collapse to happen sooner? you'll die without oil? I should think we'd be better off to not destroy our world economy. My parents lived through the Great Depression, and it doesn't sound like something to aspire to... one day you might find out that you can't drink oil. the point is: as long as there is good evidence for having oil for another decades start NOW looking for alternative sources (not other oil sources, other sources of producing energy). And start conserving. I bet you will be ahead of costs in a couple of years in your hotel if you start conserving energy (investing in things like insulation etc.) without losing comfort. #m |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Move the pain up sooner? Leave the oil in the ground and force the
collapse to happen sooner? you'll die without oil? I don't think you've thought this all the way through, Martin. The affect on the world economy of $100/barrel oil prices is staggering. The recent run-up in gas prices alone has thrown the U.S. into a major (if media-enhanced) recession. Trillions of dollars that were being spent on, oh, say, *food*, is now being spent on oil. The economy can't make that up instantly or fully, translating into terrible hardship for common folks. An example close to home: Our employees have been hit terribly hard by the decades-old decision to not develop our domestic oil reserves. Housekeepers, desk staff, and other entry-level jobs don't pay exceptionally well in the best of times, and no one has received a raise to "make up" for the sudden doubling of energy costs. EVERYTHING -- gasoline, heat, air conditioning, (and, thus, rent, food, clothes, etc.) -- has gone up in cost dramatically, causing them extreme hardship. I see and hear about it every day. Unfortunately, there is no way for me to raise their pay to match, because no one is willing to pay more for a hotel room during an economic downturn. As business drops, there is LESS money with which to pay employees, and the downward spiral can really get wound up tightly. And it's only just begun. Thanks to the short-sighted policies of people who put the well-being of polar bears ahead of people, we haven't developed our Alaskan oil reserves. Thanks to the short-sighted policies of people who fear marring the beauty of the Rocky Mountains (as if we *could*), we have not developed our Colorado oil reserves. And the Canadian oil shale reserves. And the off-shore reserves. The list goes on and on. My father was in the energy business his whole life, and predicted this exact scenario almost 40 years ago. He called it the "environmentalist's energy crisis", and -- although he predicted the collapse for the year 2000 -- he was only off by a decade or so. You may wish to ponder this, Martin. You're well protected from a backlash, sitting in Austria, but at some point people around the world -- stupid, slow, and easily kept in the dark for short periods -- are going to wake up to the fact that their economic hard times are due to people who think like *you*. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jay Honeck" wrote in
news:uiAKj.57244$TT4.46171@attbi_s22: An interesting question to ponder: At what price point do the masses rise up and over-ride the environmentalist rules that currently restrict the process? whatever the price is: what will mankind do after that? you're only moving the finding of a solution to later generations. So....you're saying we should not look for more oil? Move the pain up sooner? Leave the oil in the ground and force the collapse to happen sooner? I should think we'd be better off to not destroy our world economy. My parents lived through the Great Depression, and it doesn't sound like something to aspire to... God you're a moron. Bertie |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 07 Apr 2008 01:07:57 GMT, "Jay Honeck"
wrote: An interesting question to ponder: At what price point do the masses rise up and over-ride the environmentalist rules that currently restrict the process? At what level of soreness do you wake up and realize how hard the petroleum economy is f***ing you? -- Dan T182T at 4R4 |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
At what level of soreness do you wake up and realize how hard the
petroleum economy is f***ing you? Um, apropos of what, exactly? -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 08 Apr 2008 02:01:26 GMT, "Jay Honeck"
wrote: At what level of soreness do you wake up and realize how hard the petroleum economy is f***ing you? Um, apropos of what, exactly? Your blindness to what it's really costing you, Jay. Apparently you have no problem adding more hidden costs--on top of the massive price of U. S. military adventures in the Middle East--by allowing refiners to pollute the air and water. Not everything you pay is at the pump. It's time we got off the oil tit. If you think it's expensive now, wait till China, and then India, surpass the U. S. as petroleum consumers. http://www.heritage.org/Press/Commentary/ed121507b.cfm |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It's time we got off the oil tit. If you think it's expensive now,
wait till China, and then India, surpass the U. S. as petroleum consumers. As much as I agree, this is all sound and fury, signifying nothing. What's the alternative? We're going to need oil for the foreseeable future, and hand-wringing isn't going to change that. I, for one, am not willing to see my kids grow up in a world that has been reduced to economic squalor simply to benefit a "green agenda". At some point, probably when food and transportation costs are unaffordable due to unreasonable environmentalist restrictions on research, the electorate will rise up and overthrow the politicians who have created this mess. Only then will we see fuel prices stabilize. It will be an ugly time, I fear. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
My 302 and PDA are no longer on speaking terms | Dixie Sierra | Soaring | 4 | September 10th 07 05:16 PM |
Some IFR GPS's no longer useable | kevmor | Instrument Flight Rules | 2 | May 28th 07 02:27 AM |
Jepp no longer in the GA business...? | John Harper | Instrument Flight Rules | 30 | June 17th 04 10:49 PM |
Some airmen facing longer deployments | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | January 16th 04 08:34 PM |