Spamming Aholes!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

"gliderguynj" wrote in message
...
I read these messages via the Google home page

As it turns out, the majority of the spam is coming from google users.

google has never replied to any of my complaints, nor do the appear to be
doing anything to reduce this spam.

You should find another provider. I'm hoping my ISP will simply block all
google messages.

"Steve Foley" wrote in
:

"gliderguynj" wrote in message
.
..
I read these messages via the Google home page

As it turns out, the majority of the spam is coming from google users.

google has never replied to any of my complaints, nor do the appear to
be doing anything to reduce this spam.

You should find another provider. I'm hoping my ISP will simply block
all google messages.


Huh? Why would you want that?


Bertie

On Sat, 19 Apr 2008 05:37:10 -0700 (PDT), gliderguynj
wrote in
:

I read these messages via the Google home page....What do you have to
do, or how can I mark them all read or deleted so I do not have to see
this crap?


Send a complaint he . Responsible netizen
that they are, Google will promptly enforce their Terms Of Use policy.
:-)


Perhaps the time to consider amending the newsgroup charter to
specifically exclude off-topic spam advertising.

Larry Dighera wrote in
:

On Sat, 19 Apr 2008 05:37:10 -0700 (PDT), gliderguynj
wrote in
:

I read these messages via the Google home page....What do you have to
do, or how can I mark them all read or deleted so I do not have to see
this crap?


Send a complaint he . Responsible netizen
that they are, Google will promptly enforce their Terms Of Use policy.
:-)


Larry, the romantic netkkkop.


Bertie

"Larry Dighera" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 19 Apr 2008 05:37:10 -0700 (PDT), gliderguynj
wrote in
:

Send a complaint he . Responsible netizen
that they are, Google will promptly enforce their Terms Of Use policy.
:-)

Perhaps the time to consider amending the newsgroup charter to
specifically exclude off-topic spam advertising.

How would that be enforced? If that works, could we also update the charter
to exclude any posts that I'm not interested in? That would make it much
easier for me.

-------------------------------
Travis
Bottom posting and trimming but not happy about it.
Lake N3094P
PWK

On Sat, 19 Apr 2008 15:31:35 GMT, "Travis Marlatte"
wrote in
:

Perhaps the time to consider amending the newsgroup charter to
specifically exclude off-topic spam advertising.

How would that be enforced?

The Acceptable Use Policy of some anonymous news providers (notably
Altopia alt.net include their intent to discipline the users who post
articles to newsgroups that are contrary to the newsgroup charter.

If that works, could we also update the charter to exclude any
posts that I'm not interested in? That would make it much
easier for me.

To have the newsgroup charter amended to contain such language would
require a majority vote.

Larry Dighera wrote in
news
On Sat, 19 Apr 2008 15:31:35 GMT, "Travis Marlatte"
wrote in
:

Perhaps the time to consider amending the newsgroup charter to
specifically exclude off-topic spam advertising.

How would that be enforced?

The Acceptable Use Policy of some anonymous news providers (notably
Altopia alt.net include their intent to discipline the users who post
articles to newsgroups that are contrary to the newsgroup charter.

If that works, could we also update the charter to exclude any
posts that I'm not interested in? That would make it much
easier for me.

To have the newsgroup charter amended to contain such language would
require a majority vote.



I vote Larry out.

Bertie

gregvk wrote in
:

Bertie the Bunyip wrote in news:fud7dm$kp9$1
@blackhelicopter.databasix.com:

Larry Dighera wrote in
news
On Sat, 19 Apr 2008 15:31:35 GMT, "Travis Marlatte"
wrote in
:

Perhaps the time to consider amending the newsgroup charter to
specifically exclude off-topic spam advertising.

How would that be enforced?

The Acceptable Use Policy of some anonymous news providers (notably
Altopia alt.net include their intent to discipline the users who
post articles to newsgroups that are contrary to the newsgroup
charter.

If that works, could we also update the charter to exclude any
posts that I'm not interested in? That would make it much
easier for me.

To have the newsgroup charter amended to contain such language would
require a majority vote.



I vote Larry out.

Bertie

Larry's post is off-topic, so I've asked his service provider to close
his account. It should be done by COB Monday.


Excellent. Usenet will be safe once again.


Bertie

"Larry Dighera" wrote in message
news
On Sat, 19 Apr 2008 15:31:35 GMT, "Travis Marlatte"
wrote in
:

The Acceptable Use Policy of some anonymous news providers (notably
Altopia alt.net include their intent to discipline the users who post
articles to newsgroups that are contrary to the newsgroup charter.

To have the newsgroup charter amended to contain such language would
require a majority vote.


Thanks for a serious answer to both parts.

--
-------------------------------
Travis
Lake N3094P
PWK

On 2008-04-19 08:14:39 -0700, Larry Dighera said:

On Sat, 19 Apr 2008 05:37:10 -0700 (PDT), gliderguynj
wrote in
:

I read these messages via the Google home page....What do you have to
do, or how can I mark them all read or deleted so I do not have to see
this crap?


Send a complaint he . Responsible netizen
that they are, Google will promptly enforce their Terms Of Use policy.
:-)


Perhaps the time to consider amending the newsgroup charter to
specifically exclude off-topic spam advertising.

I suspect that Google is deliberately trying to kill Usenet.
--
Waddling Eagle
World Famous Flight Instructor