![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yeah, if I was charging $1K+ to hard wax a glider, I'd be telling you about
all the damage I've seen done by clueless owners... The maker of the hard wax bar also offers a soft paste for orbital polisher application. Use it on the controls if you fear your thumbs. Pulled this recently from a FAQ hosted by a well-known maker of paint protection products... "Some waxes do contain UV-protection agents, but the amount of protection that a microscopically thin layer of wax can provide is limited The primary goal of a wax is to protect the top layers of paint that contain UV-protection agents from the paint manufacture. If you wash and wax your car regularly, your paint will be protected and you should suffer no major UV damage over the normal course of the life of the car. Don't be fooled by some companies that lead you to believe that it is the UV protection in a wax that protects your car's finish from fading and failure, this is dishonest and simply not true. Taking care of the paint you presently have will go further to protect your finish than relying on protection supplied by a liquid you pour out of a bottle, or a wax you scoop out of a can. UV protection in a car wax formula is only an extra-dose of preventative maintenance, not the end-all, cure-all that some companies would lead you to believe. UV protection for paint is much different from UV blocking ingredients for human skin. The two formulas are nothing alike and work in drastically different ways. There is no correlation between the ratings applied to the different levels of sun blocking protection for products intended for use on human skin and the ingredients available for use in an automotive wax formula. Sad to say, much of what you see advertised about the protective qualities of most car care products on the market today is simply over-exaggerated hype used to separate you from your hard earned dollars." "Tony Verhulst" wrote in message . .. Hard wax has some abrassive content but it is primarily a wax, not a polish -- it fills in tiny holes in the surface, which polishers do not do. This is what Heinz at M&H told me. In addition, the heat generated by the process also softens the gelcoat which further helps to seal fine cracks. You need a powerful angle buffer to generate this kind of heat, as Ted clearly understands. Something that almost blows your circuit breaker will suffice :-) - the US$40 polishers at Sears will not. Heinz also repairs a few ships a year where a bit too much heat was generated - especially on the thin control surfaces. It's a process that needs to be learned and I'm still working on it - slowly Tony V. LS6-b "6N" |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
user wrote:
Yeah, if I was charging $1K+ to hard wax a glider, I'd be telling you about all the damage I've seen done by clueless owners. Maybe - but then he also showed me how to use the buffer. Tony |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I tried 3M Finesse-It II and was much happier with the
application and finish. * Mike Is the Finesse-it ll applied with the variable speed polisher like it would be with the hard bar wax? Craig |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 21, 5:14*pm, wrote:
I tried 3M Finesse-It II and was much happier with the application and finish. * Mike Is the Finesse-it ll applied with the variable speed polisher like it would be with the hard bar wax? Craig Variable or fixed speed buffer. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 20, 10:43*am, Tuno wrote:
I have a Makita 0-3000rpm variable speed polisher, a brick of hard wax, and a mandrel and other accessories I got from the dealer. Is there a technique writeup on the web somewhere? ~ted/2NO I am sort of surprized that nobody else has said this, but I think 3000 RPM is WAY too fast. Try to keep it to 1200 or less. And is what you got one of those random orbit things (junk, in my opinion) or a pure rotating buffing wheel? I used 3M stuff (Super Duty Rubbing Compound, followed by Finese-it II) on a rather oxidized 18 meter ship. It had been re-finished back in 1989 with Prestec, and put in the trailer until I bought it in 2006. It was stored near Minden. After the 3M stuff to get it shiny again, I used Wx Seal and Wx Block. The 3M stuff and the first Wx product was applied with my power buffer, the second Wx by hand and everything was hand wiped after with clean white towels. Each side of each wing took me about one hour on each product with the buffer or hand application, and about an hour with the towels hand cleaning and buffing afterwords. In my opinion, the wings on that 39 year old BS1 looked as good an anything new coming out of the factories. OK, they are thick and wide compared to your 29, and a bunch heavier, but I think they look fantastic! Each process had its own buffing pad, and its own towels for applying and buffing. I still have to do the fuselage. I would agree with Andy, and get to work applying Wx Seal and Wx Block. And, if I can ever get around to it, I have a bunch of other planes I need to get around to polishing and sealing. Steve Leonard Wichita, KS |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tuno wrote:
I've never used hard wax before, but since the factory recommends it on the gelcoat, I'm going to give it a try. I just have no clue how to go about it. (My Google search results are great -- for hair removal!) I have a Makita 0-3000rpm variable speed polisher, a brick of hard wax, and a mandrel and other accessories I got from the dealer. Is there a technique writeup on the web somewhere? ~ted/2NO Ted: I like Harly Wax. It is a moderately hard carnuba in a can. Application by hand is moderately easy. It seems to have little if any solvents. Twice a year does the trick. Wax it with sealing tape in place or they won't stick after waxing. I have found it only on the internet at www.harlywax.com. His service is excellent. Paul ZZ |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sharpen up your german and follow this link. You'll learn more about
maintaining your glider's finish than you're getting here. http://www.rall-guitars.de/andreashp...chine_eng.html Look around the website for anything on polishing. Though the menus are in english (and some of the pages), patience and Babelfish will get you the info lacking in this thread. Think of your hard bar "wax" as finishing off the swirls left by 1200 wet sanding. Yes, it reduces and fills in the "gaps" while polishing, but it doesn't seal, so be sure to apply wax afterwards if you want to preserve the finish. I suspect the reason so many have objections to the hard wax and buffing wheel is based on lack of knowledge, trying to use it where cleaning and sanding would be natural precursors to polishing and sealing. Again, the results are exceptional. If you use the right tools for the appropriate steps in the process, you'll wind up with a brilliant finish that outshines anything from a bottle... and find that each step is really pretty simple and largely foolproof. There's no mystery in this stuff, save that it's tough to find valid information from a single, reliable source. "Tuno" wrote in message ... I've never used hard wax before, but since the factory recommends it on the gelcoat, I'm going to give it a try. I just have no clue how to go about it. (My Google search results are great -- for hair removal!) I have a Makita 0-3000rpm variable speed polisher, a brick of hard wax, and a mandrel and other accessories I got from the dealer. Is there a technique writeup on the web somewhere? ~ted/2NO |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've never used hard wax but it sure sounds like a pain in the rear.
3M products are all I have used and if all your after is a final gloss "Finesse It" works great and is easy to use. As previously warned a buffer can do a lot of damage but I think if the person is smart enough to learn how to fly and understands power hand tools they could easily master it. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hard wax application is a lot easier than some make it out to be. John
Murray gave me a little demonstration, but it's pretty much a common sense thing anyway. Just keep moving and make sure the rotation is correct when you get near trailing edges and control surfaces. It works beautifully for me. I'm not scared of it, but I do have some respect for the danger it presents near trailing edges. Just take your time and think before applying. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tuno, you are getting good advice.
Machine "hardwaxing" is a skill and teaching yourself to do this as PIC the first time would be unwise for most mortals. If you are going the self-taught method, maybeyou could sell tickets to watch. The thin fiberglass/carbon skins of modern ships are especially sensitive to excess heat and pressure and a control surface can be ripped in half instantly if you get the wrong edge of the buffer in the wrong place. A friend working in a glider factory observed his 55 kg girlfriend get yanked completely over a wing when she caught the buffer on the leading edge. If you want to do this, the Makita variable spped buffer is the "gold standard" tool. As was mentioned previously, hardwaxing accomplishes a couple of things. First, it is mildly abrasive and thus removes fine scratches from the surface. Secondly, the heat of the buffer opens the porous structure of the gelcoat and the gets the wax down into the coating, "moisturizing" it. I know of a glider that was almost impossible to repair as the gelcoat was saturated with wax from repeated hardwaxing and nothing would stick to it. It is noteworthy that this ship's finish was nearly perfect even though this make and model is notorious for finish crazing. Negative issues associated with hardwaxing: 1) It will NOT protect the ship from UV. The ship mentioned above was very yellow despite the hardwaxing 2) It does remove material. 3) If done excessively and you soak the finish with wax, the gelcoat can be very difficult to repair. What protective wax to use is problematic. To my knowledge no independent research has been conducted and we thus rely on anectotal evidence and the manufactuer's claims. I currently favor and use the WX Block / Seal as the "topcoat" after final buffing of the surface. New Finish apparently does a good job as well. A Grob that was semi- annually coated (by hand) with this product sat out in the Tehachapi sun and weather 24/7 for a decade and looked great. [Rat On] Of course, it started with good gelcoat as opposed to the swill that some manufacturers pass off as a surface coating on $100K toys [Rant Off]. 100% carnuba seals the surface and does not interfere with repairs but I do not beleive it offers UV protection. Finally, I believe an optimal system would be: Buffing with Finessette to get a good surface, hardwax to get wax into the gelcoat, and WX Block for UV protection. As a side note, several studies, notably Dick Johnson, show that, while they are more difficult to keep clean, a 600 or 800 grit finish yields performance benefits and the mirror-like 1000+ grit finishes currently in vogue measurably degrade performance. I finish sand my own gliders to 800 grit and everyone else's to 1200. ![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Best Weather application | Scott | Products | 0 | January 7th 07 11:14 PM |
Application letter | Michael Baldwin, Bruce | Products | 0 | December 2nd 06 11:08 AM |
CANPASS application | Paul Tomblin | Piloting | 8 | April 25th 05 04:22 AM |
B-100 PC application | [email protected] | Soaring | 1 | December 29th 04 01:08 PM |
crazy talk - 320 into a 360 application? | [email protected] | Owning | 1 | August 6th 03 03:32 PM |