![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote in
: Buster Hymen writes: You are soooo ****ing stooopid. You can legally AND safely fly 50' (and less) from a cloud while VFR. Been there, done that, no big deal. In Class C, D, E, and G, you must maintain 2000' of lateral clearance from the clouds under VFR (except under 1200' AGL in Class G), below 10,000' MSL. Flying only 50' away from a cloud under VFR is illegal under these conditions. The main reason for this is that there may be other aircraft in the clouds. As ususal, Anthony, you don't understand. You're just a dip **** who doesn't understand the real world of aviation. We're not playing MSFS here. Try reading what I said. Then try to think. I know that's a major effort for you and probably causes you much pain, but try. I said that one can legally and safely fly 50' from a cloud. Only your incompetent knowledge of aviation causes you to claim otherwise. You are, as you usually do, proving to the world that you don't know **** from shinola. Legally means that no violation of a FAR occurs. Do you understand that? Its a simple concept. No FAR violation = legal! Got that? Apparently not, as your response implies violation of the FARS. No violation of the FARs occured. I wrote nothing of the sort, you moron. All you did was regurgitate the rules for VFR flight in class C, D, E, and G airspace without the slightest understanding of what you were reading. In fact, you managed to inroduce a subtle error in your regurgitation. You don't begin to understand. You never have and never will. When it comes to aviation, you're a total failure, just as you've been in all the other endeavors in your life. Abject failure describes you to a T. I'll say it again. Under VFR flight rules, there is a way you can legally and safely fly 50' from a cloud (above, below, or laterally). You, Anthony, obviously don't know how. But you won't admit that you don't and, instead, demonstrating that you don't know **** from shinola, incompetently conclude it can't be done. Wrong again, fjukktard. Wrong again. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 21, 3:27*pm, Mxsmanic wrote:
The FAA wants you to keep a certain distance from clouds because under VFR you are maintaining visual separation, and you cannot see what might be inside those clouds. *If you get to close, and another aircraft comes out of the cloud, you may not have time to react safely. HELLOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO ANYBODY HOME????????????????? DID YOU READ MY POST???????????????????? I was on an IFR clearance. What a maroon! Do you see the irony in this? YES! You answered to your name!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
" wrote in
: On May 21, 3:27*pm, Mxsmanic wrote: The FAA wants you to keep a certain distance from clouds because under VFR you are maintaining visual separation, and you cannot see what might be inside those clouds. *If you get to close, and another aircraft comes out of th e cloud, you may not have time to react safely. HELLOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO ANYBODY HOME????????????????? DID YOU READ MY POST???????????????????? I was on an IFR clearance. What a maroon! Do you see the irony in this? YES! You answered to your name!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Anthony neither understands the value of an instrument instructor who isn't afraid to touch the clouds nor does he understand the rules and requlations which apply to both IFR and VFR flight. He may read the FARs, but he lacks the mental capacity to comprehend them. What's even more amusing is that not only didn't he understand that you were on an IFR clearance, but he also fails to understand that it is possible to legally travel 50' from a cloud while VFR. He must take some perverse pleasure in continously demonstrating his abject lack of understanding to the world. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote in
: writes: On May 21, 3:27*pm, Mxsmanic wrote: What a maroon! Do you see the irony in this? YES! You answered to your name!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! No. In the Warner Bros. cartoons that gave rise to this expression, Bugs Bunny would say "What a maroon!" in an attempt to call someone else stupid, not realizing that "maroon" is a mispronunciation of "moron." Thus, he demonstrated that he was stupid by trying to call someone else stupid. Now do you see the irony? Another concept you don't understand Anthony. You don't know **** from shinola. Still trying to figure out how one can legally and safely fly 50' from a cloud while VFR? What's the matter, Anthony? Can't do a simply search on the FARs and find the answer? Face it, loser boi, you don't know **** from shinola. You are a totally worthelss excuse for a human being. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Sandblasting reference? | Michael Horowitz | Home Built | 7 | November 20th 07 07:01 AM |
FAR Reference - Self Fueling | Ben Smith | Owning | 8 | April 8th 04 11:07 PM |
Engineering reference: | Richard Lamb | Home Built | 1 | March 14th 04 03:18 PM |
For General Reference | El Roto | Home Built | 0 | February 23rd 04 04:00 AM |
looking for modern F-4 reference | Rob van Riel | Military Aviation | 1 | November 13th 03 08:39 PM |