![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 8, 2:16 pm, More_Flaps wrote:
On Jun 9, 4:50 am, BradGuth wrote: On May 28, 10:22 am, wrote: ? I'm still trying to figure out what this topic has to do with rec.aviation.piloting. -- Or reality for that matter... Obviously your DARPA brown-nosed expertise is insurmountable, just the way them Zionist/Nazi always intended. What is it about the rigid composite airship idea of such applied technology that's over your DARPA head? I'd like you to explain how you make a rigid shell light enought. Remember increased atmosphere density also implies increased pressure. Cheers Correct, even pressure plus full interior vacuum if you like. Or, one could simply offset or displace the mostly CO2 with good old reliable and failsafe H2. How much pressure will a good sphere made of a tough composite take? Remember that for robotics, conventional viewing ports or pilot/crew escape hatches are not required, and there could be several of these tough spheres per rigid airship. The rigid airship quest and of the R&D give and take of this topic is intended to argue exactly this kind of related technical issue. I do not have all the answers that I honestly believe others do have at their disposal. Go figure as to why such public funded expertise isn't being touted or much less shared. It seems to me that a given planet of terrific pressure and good atmospheric density beats most anything moon like or Mars vacuum like, especially nifty if that planet were at times only 100X as far away as our moon. These robotic composite rigid airships could be rather nicely remote piloted from a manned station (aka POOF City) as safely and efficiently kept within Venus L2. Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 8, 10:50*am, BradGuth wrote:
On May 28, 10:22 am, wrote: ? I'm still trying to figure out what this topic has to do with rec.aviation.piloting. -- Or reality for that matter... Obviously your DARPA brown-nosed expertise is insurmountable, just the way them Zionist/Nazi always intended. What is it about the rigid composite airship idea of such applied technology that's over your DARPA head? Are you going to suggest to us that our Zionist/Nazi DARPA wasn't in charge of having made all sorts of nasty **** happen for Hitler? Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth Brad, One word: Lithium You need to ingest massive doses of Lithium. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 8, 9:22 pm, wrote:
On Jun 8, 10:50 am, BradGuth wrote: On May 28, 10:22 am, wrote: ? I'm still trying to figure out what this topic has to do with rec.aviation.piloting. -- Or reality for that matter... Obviously your DARPA brown-nosed expertise is insurmountable, just the way them Zionist/Nazi always intended. What is it about the rigid composite airship idea of such applied technology that's over your DARPA head? Are you going to suggest to us that our Zionist/Nazi DARPA wasn't in charge of having made all sorts of nasty **** happen for Hitler? Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth Brad, One word: Lithium You need to ingest massive doses of Lithium. That's not half bad for a DARPA brown-nosed minion. Are you speaking from personal first hand experience with taking Lithium? Just for a little extra topic argument sake: http://www.deepoceanexpeditions.com/ships_3_2.html “The Deep Rover 1002 submersibles have been pressure tested to 1.25 times their maximum diving depth (1,250 meters or 4,100 feet) with a designed safety factor of four times and a theoretical crush depth of over 4,000 metres (13,120 feet).” Of course purely robotics as housed within robust spheres are most certainly more than good for going all the way down to the deepest of ocean floors. Venus should hardly be all that insurmountable, especially if using tough composite spheres. http://www.pbs.org/wnet/savageseas/d...e-journey.html “Piccard and Walsh touched down onto the floor of the very deepest part of the ocean -- where the crushing pressure exceeds 16,000 pounds per square inch (more than a thousand times greater than the pressure at sea level), and where Piccard reported seeing a fish swimming by. The divers then released the steel shot, and began their rise to the surface.” Our worse case robotic probes as accommodated by way of these composite rigid airships, as such need only survive 100 bar, thereby of less than 10% as much pressure as the more than four decade old Challenger Deep or USN Trieste deep ocean capability, and that’s if these multiple sphere interiors had to remain at no greater than one bar. Of course with robust robotics, pressure or vacuum are not significant issues, as with live crew that get a little testy ear popping while in elevators. Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
incoherent babble snipped
Wow, fruitcake and it isn't even Christmas yet! |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 8, 10:03 pm, Dan wrote:
wrote: On Jun 8, 10:50 am, BradGuth wrote: On May 28, 10:22 am, wrote: ? I'm still trying to figure out what this topic has to do with rec.aviation.piloting. -- Or reality for that matter... Obviously your DARPA brown-nosed expertise is insurmountable, just the way them Zionist/Nazi always intended. What is it about the rigid composite airship idea of such applied technology that's over your DARPA head? Are you going to suggest to us that our Zionist/Nazi DARPA wasn't in charge of having made all sorts of nasty **** happen for Hitler? Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth Brad, One word: Lithium You need to ingest massive doses of Lithium. I'm still waiting for guth to tell us about the "good name" he claims to have. I can think of a few, but I don't use them in polite company. Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired Shifting damage-control tactics, are we? What part of your USAF is 100% honest? (remember that excluding evidence doesn't count) Are you going to suggest that our USAF never makes mistakes, never does inter-agency favors and doesn't pull out all the stops in order to cover their butt? Are you going to suggest the cold-war wasn't mutually perpetrated? Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 9, 1:57 am, Pat Flannery wrote:
wrote: Brad, One word: Lithium You need to ingest massive doses of Lithium. Or sodium... that might work if he were to jam a grape-sized chunk of sodium into his mouth, then wash it down with a glass of water. "Liar, liar, pants on fire" (LLPOF)? Hell..."Brad, Brad, innards on fire"? :-D Oh, that would be something to see on YouTube. You'd have to score it to the "1812 Overture". "Dah-da-da-dut-da dah-da-dut-dut-duh" (H-i-s-s-s) "Dah-da-da-dut-da dah-da-dut-dut-duh" (H-I-S-S-S-S-S) "Da-da-da-da-da-duda-h-h-h-h-h...da-da duh....da-da-duh, da duh-duh, duh-da...duh-dut...DUH! "KA-BLAM!" :-D Pat Your Zionist/Nazi boot camp is certainly paying off, just like it did when you had to get rid of all those other good folks that had nothing to offer your boss, Hitler. Interesting how the pretend-atheists of Usenet/newsgroups are so willing to prove they still have "the right stuff". Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Homebuilt hot-air airships | Jim Logajan | Home Built | 8 | July 21st 06 06:49 PM |
Airships Flying boat 1934 FA | JaneyP | General Aviation | 0 | August 11th 05 12:21 AM |
Balloons Airships vintage book FA | [email protected] | General Aviation | 0 | July 16th 05 01:12 AM |
Are there any fligh-simulators for Venus ??? | Tristan Beeline | Simulators | 7 | June 28th 05 02:42 PM |
Unmanned airships at FL650! | Roy Smith | General Aviation | 0 | July 6th 04 06:31 PM |