GIVEN CURRENT WARS, F-35s ARE BETTER CHOICE THAN MORE F-22As

"Yeff" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 14:42:30 -0400, Raymond O'Hara wrote:

Am I the only one who remembers the preemptive war debate?


which proved to be based on false{made up} intelligence.

Who "made up" the intelligence?


the bu****es and their lakeys.






Do you remember the debate about whether we should wait to have proof - a
mushroom cloud rising over Israel - or whether we should just stop him
before he had a chance to go nuclear?

Oh, and do you remember when Clinton made regime change in Iraq national
policy? Hey, we did that, too!

--

-Jeff B.
zoomie at fastmail fm

On Jun 12, 5:21*pm, "Raymond O'Hara"
wrote:
"Yeff" wrote in message

...

On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 14:42:30 -0400, Raymond O'Hara wrote:

Am I the only one who remembers the preemptive war debate?

which proved to be based on false{made up} intelligence.

Who "made up" the intelligence?

the bu****es and their lakeys.

After a full, democrat-led investigation, it was found that there was
NO False Intelligence.

It was also found that there was no pressure from the Bush
administration to make the existing evidence appear more sinister then
it was, but their intrepentation was provided.

The Senate Armed Forces comittee had the intel presented to them by
unbaised Intel sources, and all of them, (Including Hillary), fully
agreed with its conclusions, and signed-off on the go-ahead for the
invasion.

On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 07:55:07 -0700 (PDT), Airyx
wrote:

On Jun 12, 5:21*pm, "Raymond O'Hara"
wrote:
"Yeff" wrote in message

...

On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 14:42:30 -0400, Raymond O'Hara wrote:

Am I the only one who remembers the preemptive war debate?

which proved to be based on false{made up} intelligence.

Who "made up" the intelligence?

the bu****es and their lakeys.

After a full, democrat-led investigation, it was found that there was
NO False Intelligence.

It was also found that there was no pressure from the Bush
administration to make the existing evidence appear more sinister then
it was, but their intrepentation was provided.

The Senate Armed Forces comittee had the intel presented to them by
unbaised Intel sources, and all of them, (Including Hillary), fully
agreed with its conclusions, and signed-off on the go-ahead for the
invasion.

An even more authoritative review of the Senate Rockefeller committee
language:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...060801687.html

The repetitious phrase "supported by the intelligence" is
illustrative.

Ed Rasimus
Fighter Pilot (USAF-Ret)
www.thundertales.blogspot.com
www.thunderchief.org

"Ed Rasimus" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 07:55:07 -0700 (PDT), Airyx
wrote:

On Jun 12, 5:21 pm, "Raymond O'Hara"
wrote:
"Yeff" wrote in message

...

On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 14:42:30 -0400, Raymond O'Hara wrote:

Am I the only one who remembers the preemptive war debate?

which proved to be based on false{made up} intelligence.

Who "made up" the intelligence?

the bu****es and their lakeys.

After a full, democrat-led investigation, it was found that there was
NO False Intelligence.

It was also found that there was no pressure from the Bush
administration to make the existing evidence appear more sinister then
it was, but their intrepentation was provided.

The Senate Armed Forces comittee had the intel presented to them by
unbaised Intel sources, and all of them, (Including Hillary), fully
agreed with its conclusions, and signed-off on the go-ahead for the
invasion.

An even more authoritative review of the Senate Rockefeller committee
language:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...060801687.html

The repetitious phrase "supported by the intelligence" is
illustrative.

Ed Rasimus
Fighter Pilot (USAF-Ret)
www.thundertales.blogspot.com
www.thunderchief.org



watch this. this is the man you support
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ilCWJvRxVJ4

Ed Rasimus wrote in
:

On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 07:55:07 -0700 (PDT), Airyx
wrote:

On Jun 12, 5:21*pm, "Raymond O'Hara"
wrote:
"Yeff" wrote in message

...

On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 14:42:30 -0400, Raymond O'Hara wrote:

Am I the only one who remembers the preemptive war debate?

which proved to be based on false{made up} intelligence.

Who "made up" the intelligence?

the bu****es and their lakeys.

After a full, democrat-led investigation, it was found that there was
NO False Intelligence.

It was also found that there was no pressure from the Bush
administration to make the existing evidence appear more sinister then
it was, but their intrepentation was provided.

The Senate Armed Forces comittee had the intel presented to them by
unbaised Intel sources, and all of them, (Including Hillary), fully
agreed with its conclusions, and signed-off on the go-ahead for the
invasion.

An even more authoritative review of the Senate Rockefeller committee
language:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn.../06/08/AR20080
60801687.html

The repetitious phrase "supported by the intelligence" is
illustrative.

I was wondering when someone was going to point that out.
Funny thing, the usual suspects haven't been crowing about
this report.

IBM

"Ed Rasimus" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 07:55:07 -0700 (PDT), Airyx
wrote:

On Jun 12, 5:21 pm, "Raymond O'Hara"
wrote:
"Yeff" wrote in message

...

On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 14:42:30 -0400, Raymond O'Hara wrote:

Am I the only one who remembers the preemptive war debate?

which proved to be based on false{made up} intelligence.

Who "made up" the intelligence?

the bu****es and their lakeys.

After a full, democrat-led investigation, it was found that there was
NO False Intelligence.

It was also found that there was no pressure from the Bush
administration to make the existing evidence appear more sinister then
it was, but their intrepentation was provided.

The Senate Armed Forces comittee had the intel presented to them by
unbaised Intel sources, and all of them, (Including Hillary), fully
agreed with its conclusions, and signed-off on the go-ahead for the
invasion.

An even more authoritative review of the Senate Rockefeller committee
language:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...060801687.html

The repetitious phrase "supported by the intelligence" is
illustrative.

Ed Rasimus
Fighter Pilot (USAF-Ret)
www.thundertales.blogspot.com
www.thunderchief.org

I wonder where all the finest quality "Grade A" bovine excrement that Colin
Powell spouted before the assembled multitudes at the UN - (fully
illustrated with piccies of pioson gas trucks and all, for the benefit of
those who don't read very well) came from?