Historical NOTAMs

wrote in :

Mxsmanic wrote:
writes:

How many is that and what are the percentages?

I didn't count them. Given the extreme danger from volcanic ash,
just about any eruption warrants some type of warning, although that
isn't always sufficient to keep over-confident private pilots away
from the danger.

You really aren't doing "research", for if you were, the first thing
you would obtain is the total number of volcanic eruptions.

Then, if you had some special interest in their effects on private
pilots, you would get the number that occured where private pilots
could possibly be flying.

So it would seem your real objective is to just start another ****ing
contest.



Anthony can't even start a ****ing contest correctly.

On Jun 27, 1:22*am, Buster Hymen wrote:

Anthony can't even start a ****ing contest correctly.-

The guy just asked a simple question, and everyone starts bitching
about it. It doesn't seem like HE is the one trying to start a
"****ing contest".

writes:

You really aren't doing "research", for if you were, the first thing
you would obtain is the total number of volcanic eruptions.

Then, if you had some special interest in their effects on private pilots,
you would get the number that occured where private pilots could possibly
be flying.

So it would seem your real objective is to just start another ****ing
contest.

All I asked for was a source for historical NOTAMs, which no one has yet been
able to give me.

Mxsmanic wrote:
writes:

You really aren't doing "research", for if you were, the first thing
you would obtain is the total number of volcanic eruptions.

Then, if you had some special interest in their effects on private pilots,
you would get the number that occured where private pilots could possibly
be flying.

So it would seem your real objective is to just start another ****ing
contest.

All I asked for was a source for historical NOTAMs, which no one has yet been
able to give me.

You **** everyone off with your 'tude then no one wants to help you out.

What a surprise.


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
...
writes:

You really aren't doing "research", for if you were, the first thing
you would obtain is the total number of volcanic eruptions.

Then, if you had some special interest in their effects on private
pilots,
you would get the number that occured where private pilots could possibly
be flying.

So it would seem your real objective is to just start another ****ing
contest.

All I asked for was a source for historical NOTAMs, which no one has yet
been
able to give me.

They are just picking on you because you're an asshole.

Mxsmanic wrote in
:

writes:

You really aren't doing "research", for if you were, the first thing
you would obtain is the total number of volcanic eruptions.

Then, if you had some special interest in their effects on private
pilots, you would get the number that occured where private pilots
could possibly be flying.

So it would seem your real objective is to just start another ****ing
contest.

All I asked for was a source for historical NOTAMs, which no one has
yet been able to give me.


I could give it to you if you paid for it. For free, you get what you have
contributed to the aviation newsgroups: NOTHING.

Mxsmanic wrote in
news
writes:

How many is that and what are the percentages?

I didn't count them. Given the extreme danger from volcanic ash, just
about any eruption warrants some type of warning, although that isn't
always sufficient to keep over-confident private pilots away from the
danger.

Identify one private pilot who was taken down by volcanic ash. You're just
excrement wired for sound Anthony. ******.