![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
three-eight-hotel wrote:
Admittedly, I didn't exhaust all search strings to find this topic discussed in these forums, but I didn't see any hits, on my first few attempts... I am interested in hearing thoughts on the encounters that are linked off of the AvWeb site: http://www.avweb.com/avwebflash/news..._198261-1.html http://www.avweb.com/podcast/podcast/197492-1.html My initial thoughts are that the military owns those airspaces, and VFR pilots assume the responsibility for seeing and avoiding aircraft, even while on flight following. However, it seems as though there should be some documented rules of engagement (and perhaps there are), so that pilots flying VFR through an MOA can know what they should expect. The military doesn't own MOAs. MOAs are established to separate certain military training activities from IFR traffic. They also serve to alert VFR traffic of the activity but VFR aircraft are free to enter a MOA. Even nonparticipating IFR traffic may be cleared through a MOA if IFR separation can be provided by ATC. I have always "assumed" that if I had flight following, and was traversing through an MOA, just as if I had been cleared to fly through class Bravo, that there would be some communication or understanding between ATC and the military controllers of my intentions. There may not be any military controllers working the aircraft using the MOA. I wouldn't expect to be engaged by an F-16, simply because I was avoiding a 50+ mile detour to skirt around an MOA, when I could simple fly through it with the assistance of ATC. I understand that ATC is simply a courtesy service, but until hearing of this incident I would have assumed that communicating with them to fly through a MOA was similar to getting a clearance to fly through class Bravo. Not so. In Class B airspace you're separated from other traffic. In a MOA you're simply provided advisories of observed traffic. I'm reserving judgement on the right to fly through an active MOA altogether, but if I clearly knew that, even while talking to ATC, a military aircraft could have fun with me, to the point of me feeling like I would have to take evasive actions, I would probably add the extra time to my flight plan and just fly around the active MOA's. A military aircraft shouldn't be doing that. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Close encounters of the Cloud kind - Video | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 1 | June 10th 08 02:11 PM |
| Close encounters of the cloud kind - Video | [email protected] | Piloting | 0 | June 10th 08 12:28 AM |
| Close Encounters Of The Third Kind | Mark and Kim Smith | Military Aviation | 26 | January 1st 04 12:12 AM |