![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Jul 18, 9:23*am, Andy wrote:
*The first time I sent it back to Cambridge, the second time I just waited for the problem to go away. * That probably wasn't very clear. My recollection is that the problem is only seen on some, perhaps one, log. Later logs will have good security even if no corrective action is taken. I have never erased my 302. I record at 2 second period and have recorded over 500 hours of flights. I think I have seen the security issue twice. Andy |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Cambridge Model 20 Flight Recorder WANTED | N6TU | Soaring | 1 | May 28th 08 08:14 PM |
| FSDO enforcement- GPS before effective date - which date to put in Aircraft Log for Part 43? | Ron A. | Instrument Flight Rules | 18 | March 15th 06 03:30 PM |
| Date of effect now 1 October 2004 for revised IGC-approvals for certain legacy types of GNSS flight recorder | Ian Strachan | Soaring | 0 | March 15th 04 03:32 PM |
| Date of effect now 1 April 2004 for revised IGC-approval for certain legacy types of GNSS flight recorder | Ian Strachan | Soaring | 56 | December 2nd 03 09:08 AM |
| Cambridge 302 problem: "Could not get FAT.(A)" while trying to download flight logs | Jason Armistead | Soaring | 5 | July 13th 03 03:36 PM |