A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Best dogfight gun?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 12th 03, 03:39 PM
Alan Minyard
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 11 Dec 2003 17:47:30 -0800, (Tony Williams) wrote:

Alan Minyard wrote in message . ..

Your anti-US bias is noted. The best is the M-61.


I gave lots of reasons for my statements. You haven't. So who's biased?

Tony Williams
Military gun and ammunition website:
http://www.quarry.nildram.co.uk
Discussion forum at: http://forums.delphiforums.com/autogun/messages/


You gave lots of unsubstantiated, dated, and incorrect "reasons". That
hardly improves your reliability. Any one can put up a web page
full of inaccuracies and innuendo.

Al Minyard
  #2  
Old December 12th 03, 08:59 PM
Tony Williams
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Alan Minyard wrote in message . ..
On 11 Dec 2003 17:47:30 -0800, (Tony Williams) wrote:

Alan Minyard wrote in message . ..

Your anti-US bias is noted. The best is the M-61.


I gave lots of reasons for my statements. You haven't. So who's biased?

Tony Williams
Military gun and ammunition website:
http://www.quarry.nildram.co.uk
Discussion forum at: http://forums.delphiforums.com/autogun/messages/


You gave lots of unsubstantiated, dated, and incorrect "reasons". That
hardly improves your reliability. Any one can put up a web page
full of inaccuracies and innuendo.


Anyone can also post inaccurate innuendo on a forum like this.

Please specify which of my statements are unsubstantiated or incorrect
(I don't care about dated - age doesn't necessarily affect accuracy).
As an armament historian, I do my best to report facts, and have spent
countless hours in the Public Record Office and the Pattern Room
tracking down original documents. Any conclusions I draw are on the
best available evidence I can find. If you have better evidence,
please post it; if its valid, I'll be grateful. If you can't, kindly
stop wasting my time.

Tony Williams
Military gun and ammunition website: http://www.quarry.nildram.co.uk
Discussion forum at: http://forums.delphiforums.com/autogun/messages/
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AIM-54 Phoenix missile Sujay Vijayendra Military Aviation 89 November 3rd 03 09:47 PM
P-39's, zeros, etc. old hoodoo Military Aviation 12 July 23rd 03 05:48 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.