When did this group change from?

Hemi head wanna be.

"L_E_E" wrote in message
. 82...
"Alan Erskine" wrote in news:6F3vk.33078
:

"Glenn" wrote in message
...

"HEMI-Powered" wrote in message
...

Kinda makes you the Bigot doesn't it.

Like I said to Maple1 - don't worry about HEMI - he's just a troll. I
suggest the application of your killfile in his instance.






Yeah, we know how effective those kill-filters are.

Hey Einstein, I'm still waiting for:

either a letter of complaint from NewsGuy about what
you falsely accused me of (forging headers),

*OR*

your admission of lying and an apology to the group
for being a liar.

(crickets STILL chirping)

Who is the real troll, Einstein?


-----------------------
Here's *my* funny sig from an ABPA thread on 08/16/08:
Alan Erskine says... "I've got an IQ of 151"
"I'm in the 99th percentile for my age group - that's the top 1 percent"
(nice math there, Einstein!) "I doubt very strongly that you know
anyone in my range of IQ" (Thankfully, NO!)
Lee discussing newsserver retention:
"...I can go back about 6 months..."
Alan Erskine interrupts with:
"Why should we wait for six months to download an image
that was posted yesterday?"

"alanr" wrote in news:Ytavk.644398$I42.529731
@fe04.news.easynews.com:

Hemi head wanna be.


Alan Einstein wannabe.


--------------
Here's *my* funny sig from an ABPA thread on 08/16/08:
Alan Erskine says... "I've got an IQ of 151"
"I'm in the 99th percentile for my age group - that's the top 1 percent"
(nice math there, Einstein!) "I doubt very strongly that you know
anyone in my range of IQ" (Thankfully, NO!)
Lee discussing newsserver retention:
"...I can go back about 6 months..."
Alan Erskine interrupts with:
"Why should we wait for six months to download an image
that was posted yesterday?"

L*e*e* added these comments in the current discussion du jour
....

Hemi head wanna be.

Alan Einstein wannabe.

I'm not a "wanne be" of anyone, but certainly not the loon Alan
Erskine.

--
HP, aka Jerry

Don't be a fop or a blooter, make only pithy comments on Usenet

On Tue, 2 Sep 2008 11:35:09 -0400, HEMI-Powered wrote
(in article ):

L*e*e* added these comments in the current discussion du jour
...

Hemi head wanna be.

Alan Einstein wannabe.

I'm not a "wanne be" of anyone, but certainly not the loon Alan
Erskine.



has anyone seen Alan-me-lad post even one picture to this group?

"HEMI-Powered" wrote in news:Xns9B0D759195EA5ReplyScoreID@
216.196.97.136:

L*e*e* added these comments in the current discussion du jour
...

Hemi head wanna be.

Alan Einstein wannabe.

I'm not a "wanne be" of anyone, but certainly not the loon Alan
Erskine.




Hey HP/Jerry

I was referring that to the limited-to-one-word poster
"alanr" as an Alan Einstein wannabe.

For weeks I've had to bite my tongue and NOT go to the
Alan Irksome level and "accidentally" call him Alan
Dickskin. But I refuse to do that. I'm better than to
resort to vulgarities (in here at least).

BUT! I'll be happy to list the many other ng's I post
in where it is wilder and woolier than this group
of geriatric "get off my lawn" curmudgeons. ;-)

Just occurs to me that I could violate netiquette and
cross-post to a half dozen groups and lure some of the
*real* wackos I deal with, to "come on down." Wow, this
place would fold in a week. But I'm queer for pics of
aircraft. So it'll remain a thought.

Also, please pardon my occasional nym-shift. Sometimes
I have something to say to Dicksk... oops, Einstein,
who plonked me a while back.

Mean ol' Lee


----------------
Here's *my* funny sig from an ABPA thread on 08/16/08:
Alan Erskine says... "I've got an IQ of 151"
"I'm in the 99th percentile for my age group - that's the top 1 percent"
(nice math there, Einstein!) "I doubt very strongly that you know
anyone in my range of IQ" (Thankfully, NO!)
Lee discussing newsserver retention:
"...I can go back about 6 months..."
Alan Erskine interrupts with:
"Why should we wait for six months to download an image
that was posted yesterday?"

Glenn added these comments in the current discussion du jour ...


"HEMI-Powered" wrote in message
...
Maple1 added these comments in the current discussion du jour
...

When I first discovered this group it was a place for
aviation enthusiasts to share their work. A place to show
your photos and a place to share original work. When did
this group change from that to a group that you flood with
photos from other sources? Must be all those young computer
geeks that spend so much time in front of the computer that
they don't have time nor the talent to get a camera and take
some photos of their own. Soon when all us who still shoot
are dead and gone all we will have is others posting our
work and all the originality will be gone It is a shame.

What difference does it make if an OP posts his or her own
photos or whether they post scans or pictures gleaned from
other places? It seems to me that so long as they are
on-topic and have something to do with aviation in the
broadest sense, why isn't that OK? This bigoted view reminds
me of the change from aeronautical engineer to aerospace
engineer in deference to the space race, so why is it bad
to post pictures of NASA vehicles so long as they're of
reasonable size and in JPEG format? If you want only original
works, I think you'll find that the amount of content posted
will drop off dramatically to the detriment of the group.

I see your still bitching about other peoples views.

Kinda makes you the Bigot doesn't it.

Not hardly. What I'm doing is challenging the very bigotry you
seem to be defending, including your own cheap shots.

--
HP, aka Jerry

Don't be a fop or a blooter, make only pithy comments on Usenet

"HEMI-Powered" wrote in message
...
Glenn added these comments in the current discussion du jour ...


"HEMI-Powered" wrote in message
...
Maple1 added these comments in the current discussion du jour
...

When I first discovered this group it was a place for
aviation enthusiasts to share their work. A place to show
your photos and a place to share original work. When did
this group change from that to a group that you flood with
photos from other sources? Must be all those young computer
geeks that spend so much time in front of the computer that
they don't have time nor the talent to get a camera and take
some photos of their own. Soon when all us who still shoot
are dead and gone all we will have is others posting our
work and all the originality will be gone It is a shame.

What difference does it make if an OP posts his or her own
photos or whether they post scans or pictures gleaned from
other places? It seems to me that so long as they are
on-topic and have something to do with aviation in the
broadest sense, why isn't that OK? This bigoted view reminds
me of the change from aeronautical engineer to aerospace
engineer in deference to the space race, so why is it bad
to post pictures of NASA vehicles so long as they're of
reasonable size and in JPEG format? If you want only original
works, I think you'll find that the amount of content posted
will drop off dramatically to the detriment of the group.

I see your still bitching about other peoples views.

Kinda makes you the Bigot doesn't it.

Not hardly. What I'm doing is challenging the very bigotry you
seem to be defending, including your own cheap shots.


well the advice was free but if you think they were cheap, I look forward to
your payment.

Glenn added these comments in the current discussion du jour ...

Not hardly. What I'm doing is challenging the very bigotry
you seem to be defending, including your own cheap shots.

well the advice was free but if you think they were cheap, I
look forward to your payment.

My payment is pointing out that many people in this NG have
outmoded ideas and that promoting an obsolete standard for posting
amounts to blind hatred and bigotry towards those who challenge it.
As for you, you made your own bed, now lie in it.

--
HP, aka Jerry

Don't be a fop or a blooter, make only pithy comments on Usenet

Merri-lee we troll along troll along troll along....

"HEMI-Powered" wrote in message
...
Glenn added these comments in the current discussion du jour ...


"HEMI-Powered" wrote in message
...
Maple1 added these comments in the current discussion du jour
...

When I first discovered this group it was a place for
aviation enthusiasts to share their work. A place to show
your photos and a place to share original work. When did
this group change from that to a group that you flood with
photos from other sources? Must be all those young computer
geeks that spend so much time in front of the computer that
they don't have time nor the talent to get a camera and take
some photos of their own. Soon when all us who still shoot
are dead and gone all we will have is others posting our
work and all the originality will be gone It is a shame.

What difference does it make if an OP posts his or her own
photos or whether they post scans or pictures gleaned from
other places? It seems to me that so long as they are
on-topic and have something to do with aviation in the
broadest sense, why isn't that OK? This bigoted view reminds
me of the change from aeronautical engineer to aerospace
engineer in deference to the space race, so why is it bad
to post pictures of NASA vehicles so long as they're of
reasonable size and in JPEG format? If you want only original
works, I think you'll find that the amount of content posted
will drop off dramatically to the detriment of the group.

I see your still bitching about other peoples views.

Kinda makes you the Bigot doesn't it.

Not hardly. What I'm doing is challenging the very bigotry you
seem to be defending, including your own cheap shots.

--
HP, aka Jerry

Don't be a fop or a blooter, make only pithy comments on Usenet

alanr added these comments in the current discussion du jour ...

Merri-lee we troll along troll along troll along....

Why don't you try some pithy comments instead of proving you're a
fop and a blooter. If you don't know what these words mean,
Google is your best friend but in short, you're a fool, plain and
simple.

"HEMI-Powered" wrote in message
...
Glenn added these comments in the current discussion du jour
...


"HEMI-Powered" wrote in message
...
Maple1 added these comments in the current discussion du
jour ...

When I first discovered this group it was a place for
aviation enthusiasts to share their work. A place to show
your photos and a place to share original work. When did
this group change from that to a group that you flood with
photos from other sources? Must be all those young
computer geeks that spend so much time in front of the
computer that they don't have time nor the talent to get a
camera and take some photos of their own. Soon when all us
who still shoot are dead and gone all we will have is
others posting our work and all the originality will be
gone It is a shame.

What difference does it make if an OP posts his or her own
photos or whether they post scans or pictures gleaned from
other places? It seems to me that so long as they are
on-topic and have something to do with aviation in the
broadest sense, why isn't that OK? This bigoted view
reminds me of the change from aeronautical engineer to
aerospace engineer in deference to the space race, so why
is it bad to post pictures of NASA vehicles so long as
they're of reasonable size and in JPEG format? If you want
only original works, I think you'll find that the amount of
content posted will drop off dramatically to the detriment
of the group.

I see your still bitching about other peoples views.

Kinda makes you the Bigot doesn't it.

Not hardly. What I'm doing is challenging the very bigotry
you seem to be defending, including your own cheap shots.

--
HP, aka Jerry

Don't be a fop or a blooter, make only pithy comments on
Usenet






--
HP, aka Jerry

Don't be a fop or a blooter, make only pithy comments on Usenet