Just like the FAA and Southwest Airlines

"Lou" wrote

Jim I'm not going to praise Bertie whatsoever,

Good, for that fact.

but I have
noticed with all the Bertie bashing that has taken place, he
(or she) has started to contribute actual information more and more.

When he stops responding to "the one whose name must not be mentioned"
entirely, and stops cross posting to the loon and kook groups, that will be
the first step towards not being referred to as Bernie the Butlhole.

It will take a couple years of good behavior to redeem his name for the
damage he has done, if it is even possible to redeem his name, IMHO.

Weather it's from peer pressure or just tired of swallowing his
own crap, he is contributing, however after reading this I'll bet he
reverts.

It matters not why he went on his campain of destruction, or why he stops.
(if he does)

The damage is done, and he has contributed greatly to the magnitude.

He can swallow all he wants, and then some.

Most likely, he will just switch to a friendly screen name, and possibly, be
a model citizen. That has been his M.O. in the past, I believe.

I doubt that we have seen the end of Bertie type destruction, as of yet, as
he reverts to his typical posts of destruction, though. I would love to be
proven wrong.

If you really want to know his name, ask Jay M.

I really don't care, and have no use for scum that would crap in his own
bed, as he has.

I wouldn't **** on him if he was on fire.

Enough. I gotta keep my blood pressure under control.

See-ya.
--
Jim in NC

"Jim Logajan" wrote in message
.. .

To be precise, it's a factor of 10.08 according GAUCHE (Generally
Accepted Usenet Contributions Heuristic Equation) computations. According
to the values at this site at the time I computed the value:
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...ng/about?hl=en
I see 218 postings this month by Bertie under the .aa.aa domain and
another 34 posted under the ld.you domain. Using the as
the base-line for "average" poster who posted 25 at the time of the
check, I get:

(218+34)/25 = 10.08

Or, one could simply conclude that Bertie is also subject to impersonation.

"Jim Logajan" wrote in message
.. .
"Mike" nospam@ microsoft.com wrote:
"Morgans" wrote in message
...

"Mike" nospam@ microsoft.com wrote

As annoying as he can be sometimes, at least he is a pilot and at
least has something useful to contribute to RAP now and then. John
Johnson is nothing more than the usenet equivalent of a streetcorner
kook.

You GOTTA be kidding.

He single-handedly has managed to bring so many kooks into RAH, that
the group is now next to useless. Any contributions he has made have
been negated, and then some, like to the factor of ten.

To be precise, it's a factor of 10.08 according GAUCHE (Generally
Accepted Usenet Contributions Heuristic Equation) computations. According
to the values at this site at the time I computed the value:
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...ng/about?hl=en
I see 218 postings this month by Bertie under the .aa.aa domain and
another 34 posted under the ld.you domain. Using the as
the base-line for "average" poster who posted 25 at the time of the
check, I get:

(218+34)/25 = 10.08

There's a small detail you're missing with your formula, Pythagoras. How
did Bertie's post count get so high? Bertie makes an off-hand insult or
contradiction, and then Jay, Maxie, Bob, (yes I will include myself), or one
of a dozen other regular contributors want to go toe to toe with him ad
nauseum. If nobody replies to Bertie, his post count would drop to little
or nothing. If post count is your metric of how a troll brings in kooks,
then you may want to go one step farther and look at the "kooks" who were
feeding that troll. You might find the lion's share has been the forum
regulars all along. As such they deserve the NG they fostered.

I have a feeling there are more than a few pilots that would gladly
join in pummeling him, if they only knew who he was.

So Mike, how does it feel to support a loser?

Hey, are you just another one of Bernie's socks? Sure sounds like
you are, or otherwise, you are just exTREEMly stoopid.

Sounds like you don't know your arse from a crack. You get wrapped
around the axle over someone like Bertie to the point your eyes turn
red and you want to get violent, and then you have the nerve to accuse
someone else of stupidity. Grow up.

Always interesting to see inadvertent self referential admonishments.
Never sure what to do with these observations other than point them out.
Maybe it's the coffee you're drinking.

Then point them out, if you think you can. As yet you haven't.

The only reason Bertie hangs
around is to pull the chain of people just like you.

Pulling chains is not the "usenet equivalent of a streetcorner kook?" How
about the "usenet equivalent of a streetcorner ass?" Just trying to sort
out the best fitting simile.

Are you trying to allege that Bertie and JJ are two peas of the same pod?
I'm not sure how you can equate a racist spammer who goes into drug induced
rants to someone you just don't like or agree with, but it makes you feel
better to bring up nonsense just so you can try and author a clever reply
then by all means go for it.

You attract him and his kind more than you can ever imagine.

I didn't know Morgans was on Bertie's "lits o' hate". Let me check my
recollection: Mxsmanic, Maxwell et al, Jay Honeck, ... alas, no joy, er,
Morgans.

Let me check Dudley's "lits o' annoyance": Morgans, ... ah, there it is
right near the top.

You sure you got the right lists?

Why do you think Bertie does what he does? Do you think he does it just so
he can read his own replies? The mere fact that Jim threatens him with
violence and gets his own blood pressure up stokes Bertie's fire. It
doesn't matter if he is replying to him or not. He certainly spends an
inordinate amount of time ****ing and moaning about him.


So if you're looking for someone to blame, blame yourself.

Hey - you could investigate this Jim Morgans in NC, figure out his real
name and location and then announce it to the world. That'd show him!

There's just one small thing you're missing, Pythagoras. I have no problem
with Jim posting here. Just because I may not agree with him, doesn't mean
I have no tolerance for him. In fact, I enjoy reading his posts. I don't
feel the need to be surrounded by people who constantly agree with me and I
with them. So once again you've brought up something completely useless in
a failed attempt at humor. It's not your forte. You should try other
approaches.

"Mike" nospam@ microsoft.com wrote:
If nobody replies to Bertie, his post
count would drop to little or nothing.

Mxsmanic hasn't replied to Bertie in many months. Yet Bertie has posted
followups to just about every post he makes. It appears not all Usenet posts
are propagating to your alternate reality. Perhaps that explains why you
appear to be posting claims contrary to observation.

If post count is your metric of how a troll brings in kooks,

I thought using an invented acronym like "GAUCHE" would made it clear that
entire paragraph was not to be taken seriously.

Why do you think Bertie does what he does?

So many possibilities! Maybe arrested development?

Do you think he does it
just so he can read his own replies? The mere fact that Jim threatens
him with violence and gets his own blood pressure up stokes Bertie's
fire.

That's incredibly devious of Bertie.

So once again you've
brought up something completely useless in a failed attempt at humor.
It's not your forte. You should try other approaches.

You're the "straight man" (or "comic foil") for the purposes of my humor, not
the audience. You're not expected to appreciate the humor.

"Jim Logajan" wrote in message
.. .
"Mike" nospam@ microsoft.com wrote:
If nobody replies to Bertie, his post
count would drop to little or nothing.

Mxsmanic hasn't replied to Bertie in many months. Yet Bertie has posted
followups to just about every post he makes. It appears not all Usenet
posts
are propagating to your alternate reality. Perhaps that explains why you
appear to be posting claims contrary to observation.

If post count is your metric of how a troll brings in kooks,

I thought using an invented acronym like "GAUCHE" would made it clear that
entire paragraph was not to be taken seriously.

As opposed to the rest of your drivel that should?


Why do you think Bertie does what he does?

So many possibilities! Maybe arrested development?

Do you think he does it
just so he can read his own replies? The mere fact that Jim threatens
him with violence and gets his own blood pressure up stokes Bertie's
fire.

That's incredibly devious of Bertie.

So once again you've
brought up something completely useless in a failed attempt at humor.
It's not your forte. You should try other approaches.

You're the "straight man" (or "comic foil") for the purposes of my humor,
not
the audience. You're not expected to appreciate the humor.

So who is the audience, Pythagoras? You don't count.