A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Avia Economia, Part 1



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 17th 08, 04:31 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Peter Dohm
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,754
Default Avia Economia, Part 1


wrote in message
...


The purpose of this post is to make you aware of the similarity
between EAA Chapters of today and the Flying Clubs of yesterday. But
today we have just one organization that claims to speak for grass-
roots aviation. Unfortunately, the definition of 'grass-roots' has
been prostituted to mean $100,000.00 imported airplanes. The
advantage of Primary Gliders is that they have no Easy Virtue. You
roll up your sleeves, divide the tasks amongst your Chapter members,
and get busy. Leave the bean-counters to waste their time discussing
Insurance, Registration and Aviation-Approved materials. Multiple
voices will always be heard and if loud enough, exceptions will be
granted. Indeed, many exceptions already exist when it comes to
PRIMARY gliders, such as Catch-22 and Primary 101. Read the regs,
especially those which establish the Experimental, Amateur-Built
license category. Then go build yourself an airplane.

-R.S.Hoover


A quick search for Catch-22 and Primary-101 didn't give me a lot of
information; but if you are basically talking about a primary glider with a
strut braced wing, then the single seat version should be buildable as an
ultralight glider and a two seat trainer could be built as an experimental
amateur built. The ultralight vehicle status of the single seater might
raise the minimum age of its pilot to 18 years; but that would also
virtually eliminate the liability issues.

Basically, it looks like it could be a good fit for sub-groups of chapter
members who are looking for something to do that doesn't require a hangar on
the paved and towered airport in a major urban area.

At least it's good food for thought and could result in some very
informative, and therefore usefull, projects--even if the result is never
flown.

Pete


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[06/10] - 06 05 Mig-17A.JPG (1/1) Part 4 Waldo.Pepper[_2_] Aviation Photos 1 September 13th 08 01:51 AM
[12/12] - P-51.JPG (1/1) Part 3 Waldo.Pepper[_2_] Aviation Photos 0 September 11th 08 05:59 PM
[07/13] - 08 Bow.JPG (1/1) Part 2 Waldo.Pepper[_2_] Aviation Photos 0 September 11th 08 12:23 AM
RAF Avia AN26 (YL-RAC) ellx_lux Aviation Photos 0 July 21st 07 11:20 AM
503 part name Dean Scott Home Built 5 November 1st 06 04:01 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.