Crab, slips, and crossed controls

"Mick" #$$#@%%%.^^^ wrote in :


"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message
...
| Stefan wrote in
| :
|
| Bertie the Bunyip schrieb:
|
| You're full of ****, stefan.
|
| Still better than completely hollow like you.
|
| Slips are slips no matter where you are and slips, while
| aerodynamically identical have different references.
|
| Of course they have different references... visual references, that
| is: In one, you look straight ahead, in the other, you look slightly
| to one side. I'm fully aware that this difference is enough for simple
| minded like you to think they are two different maneuvres.
|
|
| Yeah, right backpedaling boi.
|
|
| Bertie

No he's not.





Thank you.


Bertie

"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message
...

Slips are slips no matter where you are and slips, while aerodynamically
identical have different references.

This is one of those aeronautical "discussions" that can go on forever
without a clear winner or loser, unless you can agree on who's definition you
wish to accept. For very basic piloting questions like this, I keep an old copy
of "Stick and Rudder" on the shelf. I found it interesting that Wolfgang
apparently found no need to make a distinction; regardless if done for glidepath
control or landing in a crosswind, he calls them both "sideslips".

Go figure.

Vaughn

"Vaughn Simon" wrote in
:


"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message
...

Slips are slips no matter where you are and slips, while
aerodynamically identical have different references.

This is one of those aeronautical "discussions" that can go on
forever
without a clear winner or loser, unless you can agree on who's
definition you wish to accept. For very basic piloting questions like
this, I keep an old copy of "Stick and Rudder" on the shelf. I found
it interesting that Wolfgang apparently found no need to make a
distinction; regardless if done for glidepath control or landing in a
crosswind, he calls them both "sideslips".

Mmm, cept Stefan the cheese nazi has no intention of discussing anythign.


Bertie

"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message
...
| "Vaughn Simon" wrote in
| :
|
|
| "Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message
| ...
|
| Slips are slips no matter where you are and slips, while
| aerodynamically identical have different references.
|
| This is one of those aeronautical "discussions" that can go on
| forever
| without a clear winner or loser, unless you can agree on who's
| definition you wish to accept. For very basic piloting questions like
| this, I keep an old copy of "Stick and Rudder" on the shelf. I found
| it interesting that Wolfgang apparently found no need to make a
| distinction; regardless if done for glidepath control or landing in a
| crosswind, he calls them both "sideslips".
|
| Mmm, cept Stefan the cheese nazi has no intention of discussing anythign.
|
|
| Bertie

Bull****, lamer. You're the one with CDD..

"Mick" #$$#@%%%.^^^ wrote in :


"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message
...
| "Vaughn Simon" wrote in
| :
|
|
| "Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message
| ...
|
| Slips are slips no matter where you are and slips, while
| aerodynamically identical have different references.
|
| This is one of those aeronautical "discussions" that can go on
| forever
| without a clear winner or loser, unless you can agree on who's
| definition you wish to accept. For very basic piloting questions
| like this, I keep an old copy of "Stick and Rudder" on the shelf.
| I found it interesting that Wolfgang apparently found no need to
| make a distinction; regardless if done for glidepath control or
| landing in a crosswind, he calls them both "sideslips".
|
| Mmm, cept Stefan the cheese nazi has no intention of discussing
| anythign.
|
|
| Bertie

Bull****, lamer. You're the one with CDD..



Uh, yeh. OK lamerboi.


Bertie

"Vaughn Simon" wrote in message
...
|
| "Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message
| ...
|
| Slips are slips no matter where you are and slips, while aerodynamically
| identical have different references.
|
| This is one of those aeronautical "discussions" that can go on forever
| without a clear winner or loser, unless you can agree on who's definition
you
| wish to accept. For very basic piloting questions like this, I keep an
old copy
| of "Stick and Rudder" on the shelf. I found it interesting that Wolfgang
| apparently found no need to make a distinction; regardless if done for
glidepath
| control or landing in a crosswind, he calls them both "sideslips".
|
| Go figure.
|
| Vaughn
|
|

Does the term forward slip describe a slip? Yes.

Does the term side slip describe a slip? Yes.

Do both requre the same control inputs? Yes.

What next? Will we have pattern turns, cross country turns, sight seeing
turns, high altitude turns etc.

"Mick" #$$#@%%%.^^^ wrote in :


"Vaughn Simon" wrote in message
...
|
| "Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message
| ...
|
| Slips are slips no matter where you are and slips, while
| aerodynamically identical have different references.
|
| This is one of those aeronautical "discussions" that can go on
| forever
| without a clear winner or loser, unless you can agree on who's
| definition
you
| wish to accept. For very basic piloting questions like this, I keep
| an
old copy
| of "Stick and Rudder" on the shelf. I found it interesting that
| Wolfgang apparently found no need to make a distinction; regardless
| if done for
glidepath
| control or landing in a crosswind, he calls them both "sideslips".
|
| Go figure.
|
| Vaughn
|
|

Does the term forward slip describe a slip? Yes.

Does the term side slip describe a slip? Yes.

Do both requre the same control inputs? Yes.

What next? Will we have pattern turns, cross country turns, sight
seeing turns, high altitude turns etc.



What's this "we" ****, wannabe boi?



Bertie

"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message
...
"Mick" #$$#@%%%.^^^ wrote in :


"Vaughn Simon" wrote in message
...
|
| "Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message
| ...
|
| Slips are slips no matter where you are and slips, while
| aerodynamically identical have different references.
|
| This is one of those aeronautical "discussions" that can go on
| forever
| without a clear winner or loser, unless you can agree on who's
| definition
you
| wish to accept. For very basic piloting questions like this, I keep
| an
old copy
| of "Stick and Rudder" on the shelf. I found it interesting that
| Wolfgang apparently found no need to make a distinction; regardless
| if done for
glidepath
| control or landing in a crosswind, he calls them both "sideslips".
|
| Go figure.
|
| Vaughn
|
|

Does the term forward slip describe a slip? Yes.

Does the term side slip describe a slip? Yes.

Do both requre the same control inputs? Yes.

What next? Will we have pattern turns, cross country turns, sight
seeing turns, high altitude turns etc.



What's this "we" ****, wannabe boi?

Schizophrenia apparently.

"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message
...
| "Mick" #$$#@%%%.^^^ wrote in :
|
|
| "Vaughn Simon" wrote in message
| ...
| |
| | "Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message
| | ...
| |
| | Slips are slips no matter where you are and slips, while
| | aerodynamically identical have different references.
| |
| | This is one of those aeronautical "discussions" that can go on
| | forever
| | without a clear winner or loser, unless you can agree on who's
| | definition
| you
| | wish to accept. For very basic piloting questions like this, I keep
| | an
| old copy
| | of "Stick and Rudder" on the shelf. I found it interesting that
| | Wolfgang apparently found no need to make a distinction; regardless
| | if done for
| glidepath
| | control or landing in a crosswind, he calls them both "sideslips".
| |
| | Go figure.
| |
| | Vaughn
| |
| |
|
| Does the term forward slip describe a slip? Yes.
|
| Does the term side slip describe a slip? Yes.
|
| Do both requre the same control inputs? Yes.
|
| What next? Will we have pattern turns, cross country turns, sight
| seeing turns, high altitude turns etc.
|
|
|
| What's this "we" ****, wannabe boi?
|
|
|
| Bertie
|
|

You and your ignorant sock puppets.

"Mick" #$$#@%%%.^^^ wrote in message
...

"Vaughn Simon" wrote in message
...
|
| "Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message
| ...
|
| Slips are slips no matter where you are and slips, while
aerodynamically
| identical have different references.
|
| This is one of those aeronautical "discussions" that can go on forever
| without a clear winner or loser, unless you can agree on who's
definition
you
| wish to accept. For very basic piloting questions like this, I keep an
old copy
| of "Stick and Rudder" on the shelf. I found it interesting that
Wolfgang
| apparently found no need to make a distinction; regardless if done for
glidepath
| control or landing in a crosswind, he calls them both "sideslips".
|
| Go figure.
|
| Vaughn
|
|

Does the term forward slip describe a slip? Yes.

Does the term side slip describe a slip? Yes.

Do both requre the same control inputs? Yes.

What next? Will we have pattern turns, cross country turns, sight seeing
turns, high altitude turns etc.

Taking your moronic Okie logic the other direction, why not simply just call
everything a maneuver, which would cover taxiing, takeoffs, landings, turns,
slips, stalls, lazy eights, ascents, descents, chandelles, spins,
immelmanns, barrel rolls, and dozens of other things.

I'm just curious as to how Okies like you rise to the crème de la dumb
level. Inbreeding and fetal alcohol syndrome only can account for so much.
Are there monuments to stupidity in every town? Do you have museums
dedicated to stupidity that you regularly attend? Are there churches where
stupidity is preached from the pulpit? Are there clubs and civic
organizations where stupidity is fostered to a fine art form?