![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() On Nov 8, 3:15*pm, John Galloway wrote: Quite the reverse - Dick Johnson tended to find that turbulated gliders performed better without the tape. *He also usually found lower performance figures than the manufacturer's (and Idaflieg) polars. John Galloway John - Actually, it depends. On earlier gliders he started finding benefits to the turbulator tape - which is why he developed the practice of sticking it on gliders he tested.... That's because earlier airfoils tended to have laminar separation bubbles, which could be eliminated by forcing the airflow to go turbulent (which, while higher-drag than laminar flow, is usually less-draggy than a bubble). It went on this way until the airfoils developed for some later gliders started to reverse the trend. I attribute that to the advancement of high-end wind-tunnels, CFD, and other computer-modeling techniques that allowed much better prediction and testing of airfoils for laminar bubbles and other boundary-layer effects. However, many of the gliders that are still popular today (and flown in large numbers) use airfoils that can benefit from select turbulation. --Noel |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
lightning stikes a ASK21 | jeplane | Soaring | 15 | May 16th 09 05:03 PM |
Brake pad P/N for ASK21? | [email protected] | Soaring | 2 | September 28th 07 11:10 PM |
FS: ASK21 disassembly tool | Bob Kuykendall | Soaring | 0 | April 25th 07 08:35 PM |
ASK21 vs G103 | solo89 | Soaring | 13 | October 23rd 03 07:15 PM |