Looking for B-17 video...

"Ralph Nesbitt" wrote in message
.. .

"Duster" wrote in message
. ..
Holy **** and all I wanted was a video... hehe this is almost better
though..

Duster

Tarver cannot get it through his head that having the air handling units
operating under the CWT when the A/C is stationary is like putting a
pressure cooker with a small amount of fuel in it, on a stove at low heat.

Nesbitt can't get it through his head that a 747 is not a bomb and there is
no design philosophy to make airliners that are bombs at Boeing.

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

"Ralph Nesbitt" wrote in message
.. .

"Duster" wrote in message
. ..
Holy **** and all I wanted was a video... hehe this is almost better
though..

Duster

Tarver cannot get it through his head that having the air handling units
operating under the CWT when the A/C is stationary is like putting a
pressure cooker with a small amount of fuel in it, on a stove at low
heat.

Nesbitt can't get it through his head that a 747 is not a bomb and there
is
no design philosophy to make airliners that are bombs at Boeing.

Hopefully your skull is thick enough to deflect the flying "Bits & Pieces"
when an FAE occurs.
Ralph Nesbitt
Professional FD/CFR/ARFF Type

"Ralph Nesbitt" wrote in message
y.com...

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

"Ralph Nesbitt" wrote in message
.. .

"Duster" wrote in message
. ..
Holy **** and all I wanted was a video... hehe this is almost better
though..

Duster

Tarver cannot get it through his head that having the air handling
units
operating under the CWT when the A/C is stationary is like putting a
pressure cooker with a small amount of fuel in it, on a stove at low
heat.

Nesbitt can't get it through his head that a 747 is not a bomb and there
is
no design philosophy to make airliners that are bombs at Boeing.

Hopefully your skull is thick enough to deflect the flying "Bits & Pieces"
when an FAE occurs.

You mean aluminium dust?

Sorry, Nesbitt, no aluminium dust bombs, no hydrogen and propane potato gun,
just an empty fuel tank. What you write demonstrates just how deeply Hall's
NTSB implanted their fantasy in your mind.

Ralph Nesbitt wrote:

"Duster" wrote in message
. ..
Holy **** and all I wanted was a video... hehe this is almost better
though..

Duster

Tarver cannot get it through his head that having the air handling units
operating under the CWT when the A/C is stationary is like putting a
pressure cooker with a small amount of fuel in it, on a stove at low heat.

There have been several incidents world wide where Boeing A/C of various
models have exploded sitting at gates, on ramps, taxing out, or shortly
after take off after sitting with the air handling units running under ~
empty CWT's.

There are now "Air Safety Directives" stipulating/requiring certain
operating protocols to minimize this hazard associated with the "Boeing CWT
Design Philosophy".

All very true.

I was nevertheless disappointed as a pyromaniac kid, that placing a closed
paint can 1/4 full of petrol / gasoline over a camp stove *didn't* result in
the conflagration I was hoping for !


Graham ;-)

"Pooh Bear" wrote in message
...
Ralph Nesbitt wrote:

"Duster" wrote in message
. ..
Holy **** and all I wanted was a video... hehe this is almost better
though..

Duster

Tarver cannot get it through his head that having the air handling units
operating under the CWT when the A/C is stationary is like putting a
pressure cooker with a small amount of fuel in it, on a stove at low
heat.

There have been several incidents world wide where Boeing A/C of various
models have exploded sitting at gates, on ramps, taxing out, or shortly
after take off after sitting with the air handling units running under ~
empty CWT's.

There are now "Air Safety Directives" stipulating/requiring certain
operating protocols to minimize this hazard associated with the "Boeing
CWT
Design Philosophy".

All very true.

I was nevertheless disappointed as a pyromaniac kid, that placing a closed
paint can 1/4 full of petrol / gasoline over a camp stove *didn't* result
in
the conflagration I was hoping for !


Graham ;-)

You left/put to much in the can.

You want a show. Put 1 cap full of gasoline/petrol in a dry standard 2 liter
bottle, put the lid on, put it in the middle of a 55 gallon "Burn Barrel"
filled with loose News paper. Light the News paper, stand way back.

Just the closed bottle itself exploding has been known to scatter burning
paper some distance. Adding a "Cap full of Petrol/Gasoline" to the bottle,
depending on exact direction of explosive failure within the barrel, has
been know to turn the barrel over/roll it around.

Caution have a water hose handy to deal with "Grass Fires" resulting from
the scattered burning paper. Don't try this where burning paper will land on
building roofs, or drift into areas conducive of "Wild Fires". Expect
burning paper to be blown as much as 100' in the air depending on proper
placement of paper in barrel before lighting the fire.
Ralph Nesbitt
Professional FD/CFR/ARFF Type

"Ralph Nesbitt" wrote:

"Pooh Bear" wrote
Ralph Nesbitt wrote:
"Duster" wrote in message

Holy **** and all I wanted was a video... hehe this is almost better
though..

Duster

Tarver cannot get it through his head that having the air handling units
operating under the CWT when the A/C is stationary is like putting a
pressure cooker with a small amount of fuel in it, on a stove at low heat.

There have been several incidents world wide where Boeing A/C of various
models have exploded sitting at gates, on ramps, taxing out, or shortly
after take off after sitting with the air handling units running under ~
empty CWT's.

There are now "Air Safety Directives" stipulating/requiring certain
operating protocols to minimize this hazard associated with the "Boeing CWT
Design Philosophy".

All very true.

I was nevertheless disappointed as a pyromaniac kid, that placing a closed
paint can 1/4 full of petrol / gasoline over a camp stove *didn't* result in
the conflagration I was hoping for !

Graham ;-)

You left/put to much in the can.

You want a show. Put 1 cap full of gasoline/petrol in a dry standard 2 liter
bottle, put the lid on, put it in the middle of a 55 gallon "Burn Barrel"
filled with loose News paper. Light the News paper, stand way back.

Just the closed bottle itself exploding has been known to scatter burning
paper some distance. Adding a "Cap full of Petrol/Gasoline" to the bottle,
depending on exact direction of explosive failure within the barrel, has
been know to turn the barrel over/roll it around.

Caution have a water hose handy to deal with "Grass Fires" resulting from
the scattered burning paper. Don't try this where burning paper will land on
building roofs, or drift into areas conducive of "Wild Fires". Expect
burning paper to be blown as much as 100' in the air depending on proper
placement of paper in barrel before lighting the fire.

Splaps Boy can fire a shotgun blast into a gallon can full of gasoline,
at point-blank range.

"Pooh Bear" wrote in message
...
Ralph Nesbitt wrote:

"Duster" wrote in message
. ..
Holy **** and all I wanted was a video... hehe this is almost better
though..

Duster

Tarver cannot get it through his head that having the air handling units
operating under the CWT when the A/C is stationary is like putting a
pressure cooker with a small amount of fuel in it, on a stove at low
heat.

There have been several incidents world wide where Boeing A/C of various
models have exploded sitting at gates, on ramps, taxing out, or shortly
after take off after sitting with the air handling units running under ~
empty CWT's.

There are now "Air Safety Directives" stipulating/requiring certain
operating protocols to minimize this hazard associated with the "Boeing
CWT
Design Philosophy".

All very true.

All very false, Ralph is lying and has not a clue.

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

"Pooh Bear" wrote in message
...
Ralph Nesbitt wrote:

"Duster" wrote in message
. ..
Holy **** and all I wanted was a video... hehe this is almost better
though..

Duster

Tarver cannot get it through his head that having the air handling
units
operating under the CWT when the A/C is stationary is like putting a
pressure cooker with a small amount of fuel in it, on a stove at low
heat.

There have been several incidents world wide where Boeing A/C of
various
models have exploded sitting at gates, on ramps, taxing out, or
shortly
after take off after sitting with the air handling units running under
~
empty CWT's.

There are now "Air Safety Directives" stipulating/requiring certain
operating protocols to minimize this hazard associated with the
"Boeing
CWT
Design Philosophy".

All very true.

All very false, Ralph is lying and has not a clue.

Ok in "Detail & Specifics" explain;
What is "Very False?
Why am I allegedly "Lying About"?
What is it I do not have a "Clue About" regarding the "Inherent Dangers"
associated with "The Boeing CWT Design Philosophy"?

In the above context I am using the Term "Inherent Dangers" as defined/used
by the Liability Insurance Industry.
Ralph Nesbitt
Professional FD/CFR/ARFF Type

Duster wrote:

Holy **** and all I wanted was a video... hehe this is almost better
though..

Duster

Glad to be of service ;-)

About time a.d.a talked about real a/c probs instead of crank dip****
conspiracy theories.


Graham

"Pooh Bear" wrote in message
...
Duster wrote:

Holy **** and all I wanted was a video... hehe this is almost better
though..

Duster

Glad to be of service ;-)

About time a.d.a talked about real a/c probs instead of crank dip****
conspiracy theories.

You mean that crank dip**** Hall?