![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 13, 3:00*am, Stealth Pilot
wrote: On Mon, 12 Jan 2009 22:38:54 -0600, "Maxwell" #$$9#@%%%.^^^ wrote: There is also the possibility of molding this in plaster, but that's another story. unless you've tried it you would have no idea how dangerous that suggestion actually is. firstly the strength of plaster vanishes to nothing beyond a certain temperature. that temperature is just 5 degrees celcius above the melting point of aloominum. That is because it is water molecules that bind the other molecules together when the plaster cures. When you heat it, you break those bonds and drive off the water. You can test this out by weighing the water and plaster you mix, then weigh the cured solid when it appears dry. It will still weight a lot more than the dry plaster did. After baking it, weigh it again. As long as the weight is greater than the original dry plaster, you know there is still water in there. I have tried the technique to cast a mills 0.75cc diesel crankcase. this is a tiny thing about an inch and half by an inch and a half in overall dimensions. relatively tiny and easy to work with. it was done lost wax. a day after the plaster was set the mold went into the oven to melt out the wax. it was then cooked up to about 180 degrees farenheit for a while (2 hours afaik) to evaporate off the moisture. it stayed in the oven overnight (I've never been allowed to use the oven again) it was then given 15 minutes in the microwave to really dry it out. it was wrapped in a cloth and raced out to the workshop hot. it looked alabaster white and as dry as a piece of chalk. when the aluminium was poured into the mold a guyser of molten aluminium ejected to the ceiling of the workshop. *this seemed to continue for some time. an examination of the mould later showed it to be totally empty. I dont know how dry you need to get it but I gave it a fair go at getting a bone dry mould. I've no experience, but there is a nice newsgroup called rec.crafts.metalworking or something like that where you can get good advice from people who routinely have a less exciting experience. Plaster of Paris retains water of crystalization when it is cured. It takes a lot of heat for a long time to get all of that water out, like maybe 5 or 6 hours at 500 F and you should keep it hot when you our. If I understand the chemistry, by the time it is dry enough to cast aluminum you will have returned it to much the same material that it was before you mixed it. Since you didn't do that, it was the molten aluminum that decomposed the plaster releasing the water with the observed result. Jewelers work with much higher melting point metals, platinum even. They use investment, sometimes called investment plaster. The difference between that and ordinary Plaster of Paris is that it has materials added like silica that do not decompose when the mold is burnt out, and other materials (maybe wood flour) that are there to create microporosity when it is burnt out. A high quality investment may be overkill for casting aluminum, but it will be better than a molten aluminum geyser. But please do check with people who, unlike myself, have actually done this. On to the subject of cooling fins: I HAVE designed cooling fins back in a former life when I was working in the nuclear industry. I believe you will get the best heat transfer with pure aluminum. Alloys will have a lower thermal conductivity, although the more important parameter is heat capacity, the product of thermal conductivity with density. But for an airplane you probably don't want denser (and therefore heavier materials). You can improve the heat transfer and reducing the weight by tapering the cooling fins from root to tip. A good undergraduate engineering book on heat transfer should address the optimization of cooling fins. Remember also that convective heat transfer is governed by Newton's law of cooling: q = mdot * h * A * deltaT DeltaT is the temperature difference, A is the surface area (which you increase with fins), h is the convective heat transfer coefficient (usually a function of Reynold's number) and mdot is the mass transfer rate of the cooling fluid. Bumping up the flow increases both mdot (directly) and h, by increasing the Reynold's number. It helps a lot. IOW, concentrating on improving the airflow may be more helpful than improving the fins. Hope this helps -- FF |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() IOW, concentrating on improving the airflow may be more helpful than improving the fins. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Roger that. In spades. Most homebuilt cooling systems aren't. Go over to AirVW and give a gander at what one of the Monnett's had to say about VW heads.... and later what he had to say about VW cooling systems. x-number of inches of water-pressure differential between the inlet plenum and the outlet plenum... takes something on the order of 90mph to get that amount of pressure from ram air alone. And you're driving a plane that cruises @ 75mph So now you REALLY get to see the Wizards at work... guys like John Thrope, with his equations for the inlet AREA of the plenum vs the outlet area, with pieces of duck tape here & there and flat THROWING the stock oil cooler across the hangar because it's making such a huge HOLE in the back wall of his inlet plenum that there ain't no way to get the required about of pressure... and the Great Designer insisting he's NEVER had any 'trouble'... and it reminds you of the guy in Oregon with his three engines but never any trouble, or the guy in Canada with 1300 hrs on the SAME engine over a 20 year period and NEVER ANY TROUBLE... but forgetting to mention the ANNUAL 'freshening of the valves' and the occasional replacing of the bearings because THOSE THINGS DON'T COUNT as 'troublle' since he's never had any in all those long, long twenty whole YEARS of flying.... which worked out to something like 65 HOURS OF FLYING PER YEAR, between June and September, because that is the flying "..season..." according to this particular expert with his high-time VP1 now a'dangling in some museum. The only thing more lovable than a VW-powered air plane is the folks that owns them. -R.S.Hoover |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Need help with a rocket motor ID unk-rocket- | Dave Kearton | Aviation Photos | 0 | February 2nd 07 08:09 AM |
Traffic Heads-up | [email protected] | Products | 1 | July 7th 05 04:50 PM |
1966 Cessna 172 Control Yokes --- What Alloy? | jls | Home Built | 0 | November 4th 04 05:02 PM |
TWO EXTREMELY RARE ROCKET BOOKS ON EBAY - INCREDIBLE ROCKET HISTORY! | TruthReigns | Military Aviation | 0 | July 10th 04 11:54 AM |
SCAM - Heads up | DaveSpringford | Soaring | 0 | December 4th 03 11:13 PM |