A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Bamboo Propellers



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 5th 09, 01:32 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Morgans[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,924
Default Bamboo Propellers


"Stealth Pilot" wrote

well when that prop was shattered in a wheels up landing of the
sidlinger hurricane it was on, not one part of the curly grain had let
go. no glue breaks in the curly grain. no breaks of any type in the
curly grain area. all the breaks were in the adjoining straight
grained sections at radiuses either side of the wrong grained wood.


If the curly wood is in the middle of the prop blank, or carved section of the
blade, it is only taking up the centripetal forces (I know, they don't exist)
and not any bending load. It is only serving to hold the outer sections away
from each other, like the web in an I beam.
--
Jim in NC

  #2  
Old June 5th 09, 12:25 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Stealth Pilot[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 846
Default Bamboo Propellers

On Thu, 4 Jun 2009 20:32:31 -0400, "Morgans"
wrote:


"Stealth Pilot" wrote

well when that prop was shattered in a wheels up landing of the
sidlinger hurricane it was on, not one part of the curly grain had let
go. no glue breaks in the curly grain. no breaks of any type in the
curly grain area. all the breaks were in the adjoining straight
grained sections at radiuses either side of the wrong grained wood.


If the curly wood is in the middle of the prop blank, or carved section of the
blade, it is only taking up the centripetal forces (I know, they don't exist)
and not any bending load. It is only serving to hold the outer sections away
from each other, like the web in an I beam.


centripetal forces exist.
it is centrifugal forces that dont.
Stealth Pilot
  #3  
Old May 27th 09, 04:54 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
jerry wass
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 180
Default Bamboo Propellers

Charles Vincent wrote:
Stealth Pilot wrote:
On Mon, 25 May 2009 12:32:15 -0500, Charles Vincent
wrote:
I know the British preferred mahogany for their propellers, but as I
recall, mahogany had some serious knocks as prop material. I can't
bring them to mind at the moment though.

Charles


mahogany was used by the brits, to quote lattimer-needhams engineering
text,
"mahogany is largely employed in the manufacture of airscrews, and the
variety that grows in honduras is favoured for that class of work. The
suitability of honduras timber is due chiefly to the fact that its
liability to shrink (after efficient seasoning) is only very slight
and that it possesses particularly satisfactory glue retaining
qualities. it is a strong, hard, straight grained wood and is not
difficult to work."


I found the reference. It was in Martin Hollman's Modern Propellor and
Duct Design book. It just notes that mahogany tends to splinter easily
and is therefore not a good choice. In any event, mahogany doesn't
grow here in Texas, at least anywhere near me. Bois dArc does though
and has ridiculous strength in compression - double mahogany (I have a
house built on Bois D Arc stumps, the tree is so ugly, termites won't
touch it) I have the compressive strength numbers since it is a common
foundation material, but do not have the normal engineering values for
the rest. I need to find them.

Charles



Surely you've seen some native Indian bows (old ones) the wood is split
from a tree so that the heart (dark wood) and the lighter (outside,sap
wood ) both appear in the bow..The dark is placed on the inside of the
curve because it is much higher in compressive strength..The back side
is the sap wood which is much higher in tensile strength.

Pore old uneducated indians--didn't know much did they G --also
Bois= wood d'Arc= of the arc or bow. Jerry--(used to live on
Bois d'Arc in ElPaso.)
  #4  
Old June 4th 09, 10:20 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Stealth Pilot[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 846
Default Bamboo Propellers

On Wed, 27 May 2009 03:54:38 GMT, Jerry Wass
wrote:



Surely you've seen some native Indian bows (old ones) the wood is split
from a tree so that the heart (dark wood) and the lighter (outside,sap
wood ) both appear in the bow..The dark is placed on the inside of the
curve because it is much higher in compressive strength..The back side
is the sap wood which is much higher in tensile strength.

Pore old uneducated indians--didn't know much did they G --also
Bois= wood d'Arc= of the arc or bow. Jerry--(used to live on
Bois d'Arc in ElPaso.)


the actual examples of english longbows that remain were recovered
from the holds of the Mary Rose. no other *actual* medieval english
longbows existed. the making of them was pretty well lost to hearsay.
they are made from Yew wood exactly as you describe for the american
indians.
most are apparently roughly shaped but I think that that was so that
the wood behaved as needed.
Stealth Pilot
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pills & Propellers [email protected] Home Built 15 December 3rd 08 01:16 PM
Wooden Propellers Danny Deger Piloting 11 March 4th 07 10:17 AM
Propellers [email protected] Home Built 6 March 30th 06 01:41 PM
Bamboo bomber lost. JDupre5762 Military Aviation 4 May 10th 04 07:04 AM
AT-10 "Bamboo Bomber" Question [email protected] Military Aviation 4 March 18th 04 09:13 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.