Runway incursions

On Sep 21, 7:37*pm, BeechSundowner wrote:
On Sep 21, 6:14*pm, C Gattman wrote:

Awfer... are you saying I didn't quote sources? *Why, McNicoll
corrected one of them. How'd he do that if I offered "nothing
tangible"?

Only when Steve push you to put up or shut up did you offer anything.

Oh, so now you're saying I -did- offer something. Get your bull****
straight. That tells me everything I need to know about you.

*I asked you for a source you wouldn't produce WHEN I ASKED. *

LOL! You must think I owe you something? Do I work for you? Save
that crap for your wife or your kids whatever.

Your answer was

Because I'm an instructor and I brought it up on the student forum I feel obliged to "reciprocate" and clarify for other readers.

So WTF is your problem with that, besides reading comprehension?
(It's a rhetorical question. You lost my respect with your insult
below.)

I didn't say I know it all, I responded back with a source supporting what I thought was a definition of a runway incursion. *You my friend
did not return that courtesy TO ME

Do not call me your friend. You apparently didn't bother to read the
material I presented to McNicoll on the forum. I see no need to repeat
myself in a print forum and I don't owe you courtesy. I posted all
kinds of URLs in this thread including some from the FAA and one--
we've already gone over this, but---that McNicoll e-mail and had
removed.

Whether you agree with them or not, you know I posted them. So now
you're saying what I told you I observed was "hearsay." If I say I
went to the Hillsboro Airshow, is that "hearsay" too? Sorry to the
other readers here, but, I'm not going to post my coworkers' phone
numbers or whatever just so some pompous internet asshole with a
pseudonym can verify "hearsay."

If you think I'm obligated to prove what I say I saw to every obtuse
usenet jackass on the forum, you're wildly mistaken. I already
clarified what I meant, and you still want to fight about it, so,
clearly you're more interested in fighting than trying to understand
me. As proof:

What kind of CRAP instructor are you?

One that doesn't indulge snide, obtuse usenet jackasses. Glad you
asked. You have one hell of a lack of a clue if you think I -owe- you
anything. I should have just ignored your reply completely, huh? And
now you're insulting me too, so, whatever.

If I disagree with you you don't see me out here blathering about what
kind of CRAP PILOT you are or CRAP CONTROLLER somebody else is.
(Assuming you're a pilot. I mean, it's all just hearsay until somebody
proves it, right?) I'm sorry, I figured you were older than that.
Again, that tells me absolutely everything I need to know about you.

If I don't bow to your disagreement or jump to your satisfaction on
demand, the character assassination begins. You and your little
chronies here can pat each other on the backs. You really told -me-,
didn't you? *cackle*

Bye. The last word is yours.

-c

C Gattman wrote:

Only when Steve push you to put up or shut up did you offer anything.


Oh, so now you're saying I -did- offer something. Get your bull****
straight. That tells me everything I need to know about you.


Do you understand that what you offered proved your position to be
incorrect?



I didn't say I know it all, I responded back with a source
supporting what I thought was a definition of a runway incursion.
You my friend did not return that courtesy TO ME


Do not call me your friend. You apparently didn't bother to read the
material I presented to McNicoll on the forum.


Apparently you didn't bother to read it either.



I see no need to repeat
myself in a print forum and I don't owe you courtesy. I posted all
kinds of URLs in this thread including some from the FAA and one--
we've already gone over this, but---that McNicoll e-mail and had
removed.


Gene Benson chose to take it down after it was pointed out that it contained
incorrect information.



Bye. The last word is yours.


Haven't you said that before?

On Sep 23, 3:16*am, "Steven P. McNicoll"
wrote:

I see no need to repeat myself in a print forum and I don't owe you
courtesy. I posted all
kinds of URLs in this thread including some from the FAA and one-- we've already gone over this, but---that McNicoll e-mail and had
removed.

Gene Benson chose to take it down after it was pointed out that it contained incorrect information.

I just said that, knucklehead. Thank you for acknowledging that I
posted sources. BS indicated otherwise.

Bye. The last word is yours.

Haven't you said that before?

Was I replying to you, or to Beech? I gave you the last word in our
dialogue, and I extended the same courtesy to BS. I have no idea why
you can't figure that out, unless you two are some sort of couple.

Now you're just out here trying to pile on more flames.

-c

On Sep 23, 4:23*am, C Gattman wrote:

If I don't bow to your disagreement or jump to your satisfaction on
demand, the character assassination begins. You and your little
chronies here can pat each other on the backs. You really told -me-,
didn't you? * *cackle*

Kinda ironic, you an instructor being defensive when called to task in
supporting something you say. Thread stands for itself my friend.

I have never met an instructor as bad as you in responses like this
thread but like everything else in life, there is always a first time
for everything.

Just like I told Flaps50, don't let the door hit you in the ass on the
way out.