The State of the Union: Lies about a Dishonest War

"George Z. Bush" wrote in message
...

Stop playing "wag the dog" and stick to the subject. Bringing up the Kurds
is a
non sequitor. Are you confused about who the Kurds are?


Nope.



He used chemical weapons against the Kurds (that we, incidentally, taught
him
how to use) years ago during or right after his war with Iran.


But you just said he never had WMD. How could he use chemical weapons
against the Kurds if he had no WMD? Are chemical weapons not WMD?



What makes you
think that he wouldn't have used them against us if he still had them?


I didn't say he wouldn't. For all I know he did order their use. If I was
an Iraqi commander ordered to use WMD in a fight I knew I was going to lose
I'd be more than a bit reluctant to carry out that order.



And I'm
not talking about against us during last century's war.....I'm talking
about the
current one that's supposed to be over.


Why is it supposed to be over?

Steven P. McNicoll wrote:
"George Z. Bush" wrote in message
...

Stop playing "wag the dog" and stick to the subject. Bringing up the Kurds
is a non sequitor. Are you confused about who the Kurds are?

Nope.

He used chemical weapons against the Kurds (that we, incidentally, taught him
how to use) years ago during or right after his war with Iran.

But you just said he never had WMD.

I never said never. If you think I did, produce the cite, please. Everybody
knows that he had them and used them in his 8 year war against Iran. But that
wasn't the war we were talking about, was it.

.....How could he use chemical weapons against the Kurds if he had no WMD?

But he had them back then in the 80s, and we taught his people how and when to
use them.

.....Are chemical weapons not WMD?

Yep....they certainly are.

What makes you think that he wouldn't have used them against us if he still
had them?

I didn't say he wouldn't. For all I know he did order their use.

That's pretty dumb. Why would he order their use if he didn't have them?

.....If I was an Iraqi commander ordered to use WMD in a fight I knew I was
going to lose
I'd be more than a bit reluctant to carry out that order.

Then, after it was over, you might find yourself in the uncomfortable position
of explaining to Sadaam why you still had chemical weapons you were ordered to
expend. Unless, of course, you're a magician and could make them disappear into
thin air.

And I'm not talking about against us during last century's war.....I'm
talking about
the current one that's supposed to be over.

Why is it supposed to be over?

Because our fearless leader said it was over. Who would know better than him?

"George Z. Bush" wrote in message
...

I never said never. If you think I did, produce the cite, please.


Easily done.

On Saturday, January 24, 2004, George Z. Bush posted:

"Of course not, but what were we defending ourselves against? Sadaam
Hussein's alleged WMDs, which it turns out he never had because, if he had,
he'd have used them against us?"



But he had them back then in the 80s, and we taught his people how and
when to use them.


We did? Cite, please.



That's pretty dumb. Why would he order their use if he didn't have them?


Hey! There is a spark of life in your brain after all!



Then, after it was over, you might find yourself in the uncomfortable
position of explaining to Sadaam why you still had chemical weapons
you were ordered to expend.


I'd only have to explain to Saddam if Saddam won the war.



Because our fearless leader said it was over. Who would know better
than him?


He did? Cite, please.