The State of the Union: Lies about a Dishonest War

Mike1 wrote:
devil wrote:

War is a messy business, what were you expecting?

Wasn't war supposed to be over some time ago?


The "war" in Iraq has an ongoing casualty rate lower than than the
murder rate in Washington DC.

(The Marines took 40,000 casualties in a few days at Tarawa -- *that*
was "war".)

That must surely be a comfort to the families of the 500+ dead American heroes,
as well as to the thousands of American troops now missing one or more arms, or
legs, or the ability to
see or hear.

"George Z. Bush" wrote in message
...

That must surely be a comfort to the families of the 500+ dead American
heroes,
as well as to the thousands of American troops now missing one or more
arms, or
legs, or the ability to
see or hear.


So you really did expect a war without casualties.

Steven P. McNicoll wrote:
"George Z. Bush" wrote in message
...

That must surely be a comfort to the families of the 500+ dead American
heroes, as well as to the thousands of American troops now missing one or
more arms, or legs, or the ability to
see or hear.


So you really did expect a war without casualties.

When are you going to stop playing your childish word games? You know goddam
well that I am not the one who said anything about expecting a war without
casualties. I was talking about what I called a post-war mess....if you choose
to call that a war, that's your privilege.

Don't bother responding.....I really don't give a **** what you want to twist my
words into.

"George Z. Bush" wrote in message
...

When are you going to stop playing your childish word games? You know
goddam
well that I am not the one who said anything about expecting a war without
casualties. I was talking about what I called a post-war mess....if you
choose
to call that a war, that's your privilege.


Post-war mess?