Why We Lost The Vietnam War

"Peter Stickney" wrote:
In article ,
"Spiv" writes:

...

Viscounts were used on similar runs in the UK unless the 70s too, until
being replaced by mainly BAC 1-11s (another brilliant little gem). Now
the
Viscount was a superb turboprop, being the first turboprop airliner in
the
world. It had a wonderful distinctive sound.

And, in fact, it's taken you around 100 posts to actually arrive at
the one truly successful airliner that the Brits have been able to
produce. (I don't win the pool - my bet was for 50 posts.)

But how more posts before he indicates any knowledge about its ancestry?

"Brett" wrote in message
...
"Peter Stickney" wrote:
In article ,
"Spiv" writes:

...

Viscounts were used on similar runs in the UK unless the 70s too,
until
being replaced by mainly BAC 1-11s (another brilliant little gem).
Now
the
Viscount was a superb turboprop, being the first turboprop airliner in
the
world. It had a wonderful distinctive sound.

And, in fact, it's taken you around 100 posts to actually arrive at
the one truly successful airliner that the Brits have been able to
produce. (I don't win the pool - my bet was for 50 posts.)

But how more posts before he indicates any knowledge about its ancestry?

Enlighten us.

"Spiv" wrote in message
...

Enlighten us.


Us? Who are "us"?

"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message
nk.net...

"Spiv" wrote in message
...

Enlighten us.


Us? Who are "us"?

The ng. Who do you think?

"Spiv" wrote in message
...

The ng. Who do you think?


The ng seems to understand, it's just you that does not.

"Brett" wrote in message
...

But how more posts before he indicates any knowledge about its ancestry?


He has yet to produce a post that indicates any knowledge at all.

"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Brett" wrote in message
...

But how more posts before he indicates any knowledge about its ancestry?

He has yet to produce a post that indicates any knowledge at all.

Then enlighten us about its ancestry.

"Spiv" wrote in message
...

Then enlighten us about its ancestry.


I was referring to aviation knowledge. Your posts indicate you have none.

"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Spiv" wrote in message
...

Then enlighten us about its ancestry.

I was referring to aviation knowledge. Your posts indicate you have none.

Only to your mind.

"Peter Stickney" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"Spiv" writes:

"Peter Stickney" wrote in message
One of the last, certainly. One of the best... It's doubtful.
At the same time that the Britannia was being dumped, Eastern Air
Lines in the U.S. was inaugerating their Boston-New York-Washington
D.C. Shuttle service, using Lockheed L188 Electras (After they'd got
the Whirl Mode problems sorted out) The Electras proved ideal for this
service, being able to often beat the block times (Gate-Gate) of the
jets available. They proved so economical in service that they stayed
in service on that run until the mid '70s. (For a bit of perspective,
Boston, Massachusetts to Washington D.C. is about the same as going
from Northern Scotland to London. No offence, Sport, but you've got a
tiny country.

Viscounts were used on similar runs in the UK unless the 70s too, until
being replaced by mainly BAC 1-11s (another brilliant little gem). Now
the
Viscount was a superb turboprop, being the first turboprop airliner in
the
world. It had a wonderful distinctive sound.

And, in fact, it's taken you around 100 posts to actually arrive at
the one truly successful airliner that the Brits have been able to
produce.

Two highly successful one were mentioned. Also there was Concorde and small
high winged BAe hopper jet, which sold very well. I have used that in
Africa a lot.

The UK is not tiny. Others are much bigger, but the UK is "not" small.
Also the UK is not full of useless deserts, being highly fertile. It
also
produces more food than the whole of Australia, well did do until
farmers
were given lots of lolly to stop producing.

The U.K. _is_ tiny, by American (North or South), Asian, or African
standards.

That is what I said.

It is larger than Luxembourg, and Lichtenstein, and San
Marino. But it's still smaller than Denmark.

Please look at an Atlas. Denmark is smaller than Scotland alone.

(I'll bet local Breakfast Pastry to Local
Currency he can't figure that one out.

It is plain you can't

To think that I was worried about how the U.S. schools stak up
worldwide...)
By our standards, it's a Day Trip from North to South, and you're
never more than an hour's drive from the coast.

Try driving from Land End to John O'Groats. And there are still islands way
to the north and some to the south too.

In contrast, you can spen 3 days
trying to escape from Texas.

Balls. I have driven through Texas. I find it is best not even to go into
Texas.

And our Deserts aren't useless. We keep some for Nuclear Weapons
Testing,

Sound very useless.

We also use ours to test all the modern aircraft that we
build.

Do you crash them into the desert.

(And my back yard grows more than all of Australia.)
And some we just keep around to look at. You should
see Sunset on the Painted Desert, or Sunrise at the Grand Canyon.

I have seen them.

(And you missed the Vanguard, as well. Brilliant planning, there.
Instead of concentrating on one type, (Brittania or Vanguard), and
thus having the potential of lowering the unit cost to the point where
people might buy them, you built two different competing aircraft, and
poisoned both projects.)

The Vanguard was made by a different company, Vickers, which still
doesn't
detract from the Britannia being the best prop airliner ever - well a
close
run between that and the Viscount.

Erm, by that time, _All_ development was done under Ministry of Supply
contracts, part of the Socialization that was going on in your Isles
during the 1950s and 1960s. For some ungodly reason, this produced an
incredibly wasteful duplication of effort. Three V-Bombers, 2 of which
had nearly identical performance.

One was a temporary measure, the Valiant. The other two? Pitch one against
the other and one will shine. Both the Vulcan and the Victor were excellent
in their time.

Two mendium range turboprops,
(Brittania and Vanguard), which not
only undercut each other, but were
so long delayed that they had no market
niche when they finally went
into service.

They sold well enough and filled the niche they intended too. The British
have made planes that were better than their US equivalents: VC10 v 707,
Britannia v other US props, BAC 1-11 v DC9, etc, but never sold that well
because US companies could keep prices down because they had larger
production lines as US carriers preferred them.

I don't think the US had a Viscount equiv, selling very well in the USA.
Only the British and French had small jet commuter planes at one point and
the first executive jet was the HS 125.