Why are turbos rare?

On Oct 18, 7:36*pm, wrote:
Mark wrote:
On Oct 18, 1:35*pm, wrote:
Mark wrote:
On Oct 18, 8:29*am, Mark wrote:
On Oct 17, 9:36*pm, wrote:

Mark wrote:
Because electric airplanes are soon to
replace the fossil fueled redneck planes.

If by soon you mean maybe in 50 years or so.

http://energysavinggadgets.net/world...-airplane/2009...

Oh, wow, a single place airplane that can fly for all of 2 hours.

Whoopee.

Electric planes will replace internal combustion
airplanes.

Not in the lifetime of anyone old enough to read this.

--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

Polymer exchange membrane fuel cells:http://auto.howstuffworks.com/fuel-e...ve-fuels/fuel-...

More specifically, your hydrogen is easily
obtained by even the poorest of solar panels.

Typical naive comment; it is techincally easy to obtain hydrogen though not
particularly cheap to do so and a giant pain in the butt to collect, store,
and transport.

Once again, you don't know what either I, or you,
are talking about. *Artificial photosynthesis splits
water at low voltage, and the recombination of it
creates electric voltage. This will charge batteries
to serve all our flying needs.

Maybe in theory, but it has nothing to do with your statement of "...your
hydrogen is is easily..."

Artificial photosynthesis is yet another labratory "product" with no
practical applications or product in sight just like all your other
marvels that will be here "any day now".

Such as electric cars that go 300 miles
on a charge which you say are nonexistent?

You're clueless. At least watch this to
get an idea.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KTtmU2lD97o

As usual, no sense whatsoever for the big picture, much like your thinking
that Part 141 schools are the entirety of flight training.

I never made that claim.

Correct, you never made that precise statement

Then why say it? I never claimed anything even
remotely like that. Furthermore I've already clarified
this more than once. It doesn't sink in with you.

what you did was extrapolate
on the requirement for Part 141 schools to have a FAA approved syllabus

I didn't extrapolate it. I actually cited the FAA
far which specified it. But you apparently can't read.

and applied that requirement to all flight training,

That's patently untrue and nothing short of a lie. You
are the one that tried to change the subject to include
all flight training, not me.

which is nonsense.

Moreover you claimed the FAA provides the syllabus,

I never claimed that. That's a lie.

which is more nonsense.

You're wasting my time again due to your
"comprehension problem".


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Mark wrote:

Such as electric cars that go 300 miles
on a charge which you say are nonexistent?

Make, model, MSRP?

You're clueless. At least watch this to
get an idea.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KTtmU2lD97o

Whoopee, a babbling youtube video.

I didn't extrapolate it. I actually cited the FAA
far which specified it.

Lying sack, it was more of your arm waving generalizations that started all
that and you didn't cite anything until several posts in.

Moreover you claimed the FAA provides the syllabus,

I never claimed that. That's a lie.

Lying sack, you claimed it several times.


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

On Oct 18, 1:35*pm, wrote:

More specifically, your hydrogen is easily
obtained by even the poorest of solar panels.

Typical naive comment; it is techincally easy to obtain hydrogen though not
particularly cheap to do so and a giant pain in the butt to collect, store,
and transport.

It is very cheap to obtain hydrogen, easy to
collect, easy to store, easy to transport. This
is a fact. But there is no need to transport it
anywhere. It is best used to make electricity.

---
Mark

On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 16:18:21 -0700 (PDT), Mark wrote:

It is very cheap to obtain hydrogen, easy to
collect, easy to store, easy to transport. This
is a fact. But there is no need to transport it
anywhere. It is best used to make electricity.
I invented hydrogen. In fact, I fart it.
---
Mark

ooooooooooooooooooooooooK

On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 19:21:56 -0400, Ted Sherman wrote:

On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 16:18:21 -0700 (PDT), Mark wrote:

It is very cheap to obtain hydrogen, easy to
collect, easy to store, easy to transport. This
is a fact. But there is no need to transport it
anywhere. It is best used to make electricity.
I invented hydrogen. In fact, I fart it.
---
Mark

ooooooooooooooooooooooooK

Would you consider lighting one of those farts and blowing your butt
off?

TIA.

lol
--
A fireside chat not with Ari!
http://tr.im/holj
Motto: Live To Spooge It!

On Oct 18, 7:23*pm, Ari Silverstein wrote:
On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 19:21:56 -0400, Ted Sherman wrote:
On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 16:18:21 -0700 (PDT), Mark wrote:

It is very cheap to obtain hydrogen, easy to
collect, easy to store, easy to transport. This
is a fact. But there is no need to transport it
anywhere. It is best used to make electricity.
I invented hydrogen. In fact, I fart it.
---
Mark

ooooooooooooooooooooooooK

Would you consider lighting one of those farts and blowing your butt
off?

TIA.

lol
--
A fireside chat not with Ari!http://tr.im/holj
Motto: Live To Spooge It!

Water and steam turbos are every where. TreBert

Mark wrote:
On Oct 18, 1:35Â*pm, wrote:

More specifically, your hydrogen is easily
obtained by even the poorest of solar panels.

Typical naive comment; it is techincally easy to obtain hydrogen though not
particularly cheap to do so and a giant pain in the butt to collect, store,
and transport.

It is very cheap to obtain hydrogen, easy to
collect, easy to store, easy to transport. This
is a fact. But there is no need to transport it
anywhere. It is best used to make electricity.

Delusional nonsense.

For starters it costs more to make hydrogen than the value of any electricity
you could get by burning it to get electricity.

The rest is just childish nonsense.

--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.