![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 10 Jan 2011 08:56:29 +0200, BruceGreeff
wrote: I think there is too much FUD around Flarm (That's IBM speak for Fear Uncertainty and Doubt) We've been through the same "FUD" in Italy ;-) Experience of introducing Flarm in the south African racing environment was effectively painless. There was never a decrease in safety attributable to Flarm. I've flown more than 20 competitions, maybe 30, since Flarm was available in Europe (2005 I think). So far, the races have been safer in my opinion. No collisions between Flarm-equipped gliders. To my knowledge there was no material increase in leeching. If you can keep up to leech, the Flarm is unlikely to help much... Since Flarm "radar" or display has been available (a couple of racing seasons), it has been just a little easier to catch-up with a glider I was trying to leech, after I lost visual contact for a while. If you are close enough to the other thermal to be able to use the information about relative climb rate - you can probably verify the differential as effectively visually. The climb rate is so unreliable (most probably uncompensated) that it never helped me locate a thermal I didn't see earlier (gliders, birds etc.). It has helped me understand that I was not centered correctly, on some occasions. Once the two glider are established in the same thermal in a steady climb, the value shown by the display becomes comparable and reliable. By them it's too late to be of any use except: "darn, I have to squeeze the best lift there apparently is". Under cloudstreets, or convergence lines, it is now easier to compare the different flight paths and decisions. I may say that I now learn much more from each flight. Have contests become safer? I believe contest are safer. And, some may be surprised by this statement, more fun for me. Let me explain. Racing gliders are now a bit easier to spot in the sky, and I get more "awareness" of how they're doing. So, I feel more involved. . There are at least three pilots who would still be with us if they had Flarm working. Same in Italy. There was a collision, killing one. The other glider had no Flarm on board. Some use it well, some don't - as with everything. Cloud flying is prohibited in Italy. In the pre-start tactical game, I have seen Flarm objects flying higher than cloudbase, above me. Was Flarm only a witness of their behaviour, or an encouragement? I don't know, but I know that loggers and software allow for analysis and, if guilty, penalization of the offenders. aldo cernezzi - www.voloavela.it The Italian Gliding magazine Cheers Bruce |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 8, 7:17*pm, "kirk.stant" wrote:
Where do you get that "Flarmers" will be able to leach better than non- flarmers. Really? Kindly explain how that will work. I've never seen that fear raised in any discussion of Flarm. The whole leaching question is a tempest in a teapot. *If it bothers you, turn on Stealth mode and you can't be leached (but will still get collision warning). Kirk 66 Kirk, My understanding is that if stealth mode is off then a pilot can see the climb rate of other flarm equipped gliders in the area: One way to do it is using Winpilot - see this from the winpilot site: "FLARM Support: Added the ability to track several other gliders in the vicinity that also carry FLARM on board. WinPilot can now show visually the position of the other gliders, their bearing, and also indicate weather or not they are climbing, and if so, what their current climb rate is." see the graphic on the main page. http://www.winpilot.com/images4/News2.gif seeyou mobile does the same as do other systems: http://gliderpilot.org/files/FlarmFl...le%20Flarm.jpg So is it a fair competition if in early 2011 part of the fleet is allowed to share remote thermal sensing data? Like shooting fish in a barrel, not a contest. To me it appears that we are allowing team flying - with good displays and coordination 2 or more pilots could team fly a whole contest season and never have to talk on the radio. So maybe I turn my stealth mode on to prevent others from getting my data but that won't stop other pilots from team flying via flarm. I do not understand why we would introduce it "unrestricted" for 2011. I realize we/Rules Committee do[es] not have familiarity with the system, but other countries do, can we learn from them rather than risk as much chaos? Andy posted the UK 2010 flarm rules earlier in this discussion, to me it makes sense for us to start off with the stealth mode required too, that gets the anti-collision function and reduces the data sharing issues. This is my request to the Rules Committee. To Henry's point i do think there is some risk, especially early on of pilots focusing on their "show me where to find lift radar screen" that they don't look out the window for the non flarm guys as much. Ironically could be more dangerous. omg I am agreeing with Henry on something? ;-) Chris |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 8, 8:46*pm, chris wrote:
On Jan 8, 7:17*pm, "kirk.stant" wrote: Where do you get that "Flarmers" will be able to leach better than non- flarmers. Really? Kindly explain how that will work. I've never seen that fear raised in any discussion of Flarm. The whole leaching question is a tempest in a teapot. *If it bothers you, turn on Stealth mode and you can't be leached (but will still get collision warning). Kirk 66 Kirk, My understanding is that if stealth mode is off then a pilot can see the climb rate of other flarm equipped gliders in the area: *One way to do it is using Winpilot - see this from the winpilot site: "FLARM Support: Added the ability to track several other gliders in the vicinity that also carry FLARM on board. WinPilot can now show visually the position of the other gliders, their bearing, and also indicate weather or not they are climbing, and if so, what their current climb rate is." see the graphic on the main page.http://www.winpilot.com/images4/News2.gif seeyou mobile does the same as do other systems:http://gliderpilot.org/files/FlarmFl...rformance/SeeY... So is it a fair competition if in early 2011 part of the fleet is allowed to share remote thermal sensing data? Like shooting fish in a barrel, not a contest. *To me it appears that we are allowing team flying - with good displays and coordination 2 or more pilots could team fly a whole contest season and never have to talk on the radio. *So maybe I turn my stealth mode on to prevent others from getting my data but that won't stop other pilots from team flying via flarm. I do not understand why we would introduce it "unrestricted" for 2011. *I realize we/Rules Committee do[es] not have familiarity with the system, but other countries do, can we learn from them rather than risk as much chaos? * Andy posted the UK 2010 flarm rules earlier in this discussion, to me it makes sense for us to start off with the stealth mode required too, that gets the anti-collision function and reduces the data sharing issues. This is my request to the Rules Committee. To Henry's point i do think there is some risk, especially early on of pilots focusing on their "show me where to find lift radar screen" that they don't look out the window for the non flarm guys as much. Ironically could be more dangerous. * * omg I am agreeing with Henry on something? ;-) Chris If seeing other competitors climb rates is a competitive advantage then that's an additional incentive for everyone to equip with PowerFLARM. That is exactly where we would have been with MIRA except that for the 2011 racing reason it's still voluntary and no pilot will lose a contest day to a FLARM failure. Andy (GY) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 9, 10:18*am, Andy wrote:
If seeing other competitors climb rates is a competitive advantage then that's *an additional incentive for everyone to equip with PowerFLARM. Andy (GY) So at what point do we just call them "cross country cooperative fly togethers" and remove the words competition and contest? The ideal setup is a duo discus with large format computer screens, the guy in back can just operate the computers and track all the other gliders and navigate to each marked thermal. Chris |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 8, 8:46*pm, chris wrote:
Kirk, My understanding is that if stealth mode is off then a pilot can see the climb rate of other flarm equipped gliders in the area: * So maybe I turn my stealth mode on to prevent others from getting my data but that won't stop other pilots from team flying via flarm. Chris That's the whole point: I you are worried someone will leech (got it right this time!) your thermal off FLARM, then you select Stealth mode and no one gets your climb info - and you don't get anyone else's climb info. But you ALL still get collision warning. So if all the hotshots are worried about team flying and leeching by newbies - all it takes is for them to get together in the bar before the race and agree on selecting Stealth mode. If anyone cheats and doesn't stealth-up, he still won't see anything unless others also cheat - and anyone with a Flarm could momentarily deselect Stealth mode and possibly catch the cheaters. Sure, people could team fly if they agreed ahead of time - but remember the flarm logger records the mode, so the probability of getting caught is pretty high - because anyone can at any time see that you are not in Stealth mode! Guys, you are overthinking this issue. At the ranges Flarm will show other gliders, you either are going to already see it cranking and banking in a boomer, or by the time you get there the bubble is gone.... Everyone just take a deep breath, relax, and let's go out and have fun. Kirk 66 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Contests the end-all? | Morgans[_2_] | Soaring | 29 | May 21st 10 11:10 PM |
Participating in Contests | MickiMinner | Soaring | 16 | October 2nd 08 02:26 AM |
GPS interference and contests | Bill Daniels | Soaring | 25 | January 25th 08 05:57 AM |
sectionals for contests | BB | Soaring | 17 | January 23rd 07 06:54 PM |
ideas for fun contests at fly-ins | Hoot | Piloting | 9 | April 30th 04 10:58 AM |