![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 9, 5:37*pm, Andy wrote:
On Jan 8, 10:20*pm, Timinnc wrote: All my training in a G103. Looking for a decent glass ship under $20k. Looking seriously at 15b or Jantar Std 2 or Standard 41a. Any big differences between the Jantar choices? I get that the 15b will likely climb better in weak lift but the Jantars will dust the 15b when XC. I am 6'1" and have long arms, so a Jantar should not be a problem for me. I know I can't go wrong with the 15b but there is the gelcoat issue... and if I want to get into XC any time soon the Jantar will do better. Comes down to condition of plane and trailer for what can be purchased under $20k. So an opinion about any and all of the planes mentioned would be good with emphasis on the performance difference regarding the Jantar 41a (Standard) and 48-1 (Standard 2). THANKS -- Timinnc Never flew the -2 but it was reputed to have better performance than the original Jantar Std. * The (original) Jantar Std was my first glass ship (leased not owned) and I did all my Gold and Diamond flights in it. *I didn't realize how much of a dog it was until I bought my ASW-19b! *Of course had I not had the opportunity of the very low cost lease I may never have got into XC and contest flying. Any glider is better than no glider and I learned a lot in it. BTW the trailer on that glider sucked but it had no influence on how often I flew, or where I went. *I didn't know any better. Andy (GY) There are those who will say that "serious" and "Jantar" shouldn't be in the same sentence! However, my first ship was a Jantar (the 19m Jantar-1), which has about the same fuselage as the 15m ships, if I'm not mistaken. It flew pretty well and I had some great cross-country flights while I owned it. Some caveats -the wings are heavy and take some skill to rig. The cockpit is quite roomy, but the ergonomics are not on par with the latest designs. Older Jantars have experienced some play in control linkages, so make sure you have access to spares (some of them were odd sizes). The biggest problem I had was an absolutely crappy home- made trailer (basically a cardboard box on wheels). I can't emphasize enough how much a good trailer is worth! Mike |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The trailer is a critical thing to look at. Fitting in the glider will
also be critical. Flying wise, the German ships will be lighter and more harmonious on the controls. The Jantar 2 is a good runner and honest to fly. The controls are a little heavy but not bad. With some fine tuning the cockpit can be one of the most comfortable of all gliders. Rear visibility in the Jantar is very good. A Jantar 2 won 4 of 9 days at the US Sports Nationals last year and had many 15 m ships following it around on course. It runs well in the 75 to 80 knot range. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Yet another PA-28 wingtip query... | Mike Spera | Owning | 2 | August 4th 09 03:07 AM |
PA-28-180 Low power query | [email protected] | Owning | 14 | October 7th 08 01:59 PM |
Query on Geo Pilot GPS | Mike Isaksen | Piloting | 7 | August 8th 07 02:38 AM |
Tool query... | Tina Marie | Owning | 2 | July 15th 04 05:20 AM |
A query | news | Military Aviation | 2 | October 18th 03 04:27 PM |