A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Russian Air Force Woes - Time to start again?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 17th 04, 08:59 PM
Yama
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Krztalizer" wrote in message
...

A Finnish pilot who was in F-18 training in USA told that most USN (I

don't
recall whether it was an USN or USMC base) mechanics receive surprisingly
little overall training, by Finnish standards.


I think the more likely scenario is that your Finnish pilot friend had

very
little exposure to the vast amounts of training that USN mechanics go

through -
I seriously doubt if most pilots in any air force are completely up to

date on
the training aspects of a junior enlisted person's life.


My memory is fuzzy so I dug out the original article. Person in question was
not a pilot but a Finnish mechanic. Here's his exact words (my translation):
"In Finnish Air Force mechanics need a long and throught training, but in
USA much of the technical work is done by recruit with a couple of weeks
theoretic training. -Maybe that's why Americans sometimes had hard time to
grasp that we at rank of Lieutenant still actually do something to the
aircraft." Obviously I cannot personally verify how accurate his description
is.


  #2  
Old February 17th 04, 11:38 PM
Krztalizer
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"In Finnish Air Force mechanics need a long and throught training, but in
USA much of the technical work is done by recruit with a couple of weeks
theoretic training. -


I think the Finnish mechanic was confusing plane captains with jet mechanics -
PCs did tend to fall into the category of "welcome to the Navy, now get to
work", but actual jet engine mechanics became so after comprehensive training
on the particular aircraft propulsion system their intended squadron and
aircraft type used. The various schools that taught jet engine mechanics, such
as at NATC Memphis, had an entire field of hack aircraft to draw from, for
classroom studies. We tore down and rebuilt APUs, disassembled TF-34s and
T-58s and it wasn't theoretical studies, we were in there busting knuckles.
The author of the article was a Lt, so I believe my contention that he wouldn't
be spending much time hanging out among the junior enlisted 'mechs' remains a
valid comment - mechs in squadrons I flew in had experience levels from 2
months to 33 years and the median level of experience was probably about 3-4
years and at about the E-4 or E-5 level. Plane Captains did match the profile
he stated in his article - most are under 20, have less than 6 months of
aviation-oriented schooling, but they are not expected to complete their tasks
in a vaccuum; there was always an old hand available to assist, and a big set
of boots around to kick your butt for getting caught being stupid.

v/r
Gordon
====(A+C====
USN SAR

Donate your memories - write a note on the back and send your old photos to a
reputable museum, don't take them with you when you're gone.

  #3  
Old February 18th 04, 03:57 AM
Pete
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Yama" wrote

My memory is fuzzy so I dug out the original article. Person in question

was
not a pilot but a Finnish mechanic. Here's his exact words (my

translation):
"In Finnish Air Force mechanics need a long and throught training, but in
USA much of the technical work is done by recruit with a couple of weeks
theoretic training. -Maybe that's why Americans sometimes had hard time to
grasp that we at rank of Lieutenant still actually do something to the
aircraft." Obviously I cannot personally verify how accurate his

description
is.


If the LT's are fixing the jets, what are the lower level NCO's and
privates/airmen doing?

Pete


  #4  
Old February 19th 04, 10:06 PM
Yama
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Pete" wrote in message
...
"Yama" wrote
My memory is fuzzy so I dug out the original article. Person in question

was
not a pilot but a Finnish mechanic. Here's his exact words (my

translation):
"In Finnish Air Force mechanics need a long and throught training, but

in
USA much of the technical work is done by recruit with a couple of weeks
theoretic training. -Maybe that's why Americans sometimes had hard time

to
grasp that we at rank of Lieutenant still actually do something to the
aircraft." Obviously I cannot personally verify how accurate his

description
is.


If the LT's are fixing the jets, what are the lower level NCO's and
privates/airmen doing?


They're helping them, doing all the kind of stuff which does not require
special expertise (hauling ordnance, fueling etc).
Reportedly it was difficult to position Finnish mechanics to USN training
programs, as they were used to totally different sharing of tasks.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Boeing Boondoggle Larry Dighera Military Aviation 77 September 15th 04 02:39 AM
bush rules! Be Kind Military Aviation 53 February 14th 04 04:26 PM
us air force us air force academy us air force bases air force museum us us air force rank us air force reserve adfunk Jehad Internet Military Aviation 0 February 7th 04 04:24 AM
RV-7a baggage area David Smith Home Built 32 December 15th 03 04:08 AM
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools RT Military Aviation 104 September 25th 03 03:17 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.