![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Krztalizer" wrote in message ... A Finnish pilot who was in F-18 training in USA told that most USN (I don't recall whether it was an USN or USMC base) mechanics receive surprisingly little overall training, by Finnish standards. I think the more likely scenario is that your Finnish pilot friend had very little exposure to the vast amounts of training that USN mechanics go through - I seriously doubt if most pilots in any air force are completely up to date on the training aspects of a junior enlisted person's life. My memory is fuzzy so I dug out the original article. Person in question was not a pilot but a Finnish mechanic. Here's his exact words (my translation): "In Finnish Air Force mechanics need a long and throught training, but in USA much of the technical work is done by recruit with a couple of weeks theoretic training. -Maybe that's why Americans sometimes had hard time to grasp that we at rank of Lieutenant still actually do something to the aircraft." Obviously I cannot personally verify how accurate his description is. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"In Finnish Air Force mechanics need a long and throught training, but in
USA much of the technical work is done by recruit with a couple of weeks theoretic training. - I think the Finnish mechanic was confusing plane captains with jet mechanics - PCs did tend to fall into the category of "welcome to the Navy, now get to work", but actual jet engine mechanics became so after comprehensive training on the particular aircraft propulsion system their intended squadron and aircraft type used. The various schools that taught jet engine mechanics, such as at NATC Memphis, had an entire field of hack aircraft to draw from, for classroom studies. We tore down and rebuilt APUs, disassembled TF-34s and T-58s and it wasn't theoretical studies, we were in there busting knuckles. The author of the article was a Lt, so I believe my contention that he wouldn't be spending much time hanging out among the junior enlisted 'mechs' remains a valid comment - mechs in squadrons I flew in had experience levels from 2 months to 33 years and the median level of experience was probably about 3-4 years and at about the E-4 or E-5 level. Plane Captains did match the profile he stated in his article - most are under 20, have less than 6 months of aviation-oriented schooling, but they are not expected to complete their tasks in a vaccuum; there was always an old hand available to assist, and a big set of boots around to kick your butt for getting caught being stupid. v/r Gordon ====(A+C==== USN SAR Donate your memories - write a note on the back and send your old photos to a reputable museum, don't take them with you when you're gone. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Yama" wrote My memory is fuzzy so I dug out the original article. Person in question was not a pilot but a Finnish mechanic. Here's his exact words (my translation): "In Finnish Air Force mechanics need a long and throught training, but in USA much of the technical work is done by recruit with a couple of weeks theoretic training. -Maybe that's why Americans sometimes had hard time to grasp that we at rank of Lieutenant still actually do something to the aircraft." Obviously I cannot personally verify how accurate his description is. If the LT's are fixing the jets, what are the lower level NCO's and privates/airmen doing? Pete |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Pete" wrote in message ... "Yama" wrote My memory is fuzzy so I dug out the original article. Person in question was not a pilot but a Finnish mechanic. Here's his exact words (my translation): "In Finnish Air Force mechanics need a long and throught training, but in USA much of the technical work is done by recruit with a couple of weeks theoretic training. -Maybe that's why Americans sometimes had hard time to grasp that we at rank of Lieutenant still actually do something to the aircraft." Obviously I cannot personally verify how accurate his description is. If the LT's are fixing the jets, what are the lower level NCO's and privates/airmen doing? They're helping them, doing all the kind of stuff which does not require special expertise (hauling ordnance, fueling etc). Reportedly it was difficult to position Finnish mechanics to USN training programs, as they were used to totally different sharing of tasks. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Boeing Boondoggle | Larry Dighera | Military Aviation | 77 | September 15th 04 02:39 AM |
bush rules! | Be Kind | Military Aviation | 53 | February 14th 04 04:26 PM |
us air force us air force academy us air force bases air force museum us us air force rank us air force reserve adfunk | Jehad Internet | Military Aviation | 0 | February 7th 04 04:24 AM |
RV-7a baggage area | David Smith | Home Built | 32 | December 15th 03 04:08 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |