Disclosure Imminent? Eight + Underground NWO Bases Destroyed?

UPDATED Wednesday 9/21. No radioactivity was found in either of the
bases. Method of attack still unknown. Damage is so extreme there will
be no effort to access them. Scroll to bottom of article for more.

Given lack of radioactivity or extreme chem/bio hazard, no reason not
to try. Even the dynamited Nordhausen complex was re-entered years
later.

On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 10:34:40 -0700 (PDT), David E. Powell wrote:

UPDATED Wednesday 9/21. No radioactivity was found in either of the
bases. Method of attack still unknown. Damage is so extreme there will
be no effort to access them. Scroll to bottom of article for more.

Given lack of radioactivity or extreme chem/bio hazard, no reason not
to try. Even the dynamited Nordhausen complex was re-entered years
later.

If you have the security clearance, let's get together and do so.

On 10/8/2011 2:41 PM, Tom wrote:
On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 10:34:40 -0700 (PDT), David E. Powell wrote:

UPDATED Wednesday 9/21. No radioactivity was found in either of the
bases. Method of attack still unknown. Damage is so extreme there will
be no effort to access them. Scroll to bottom of article for more.

Given lack of radioactivity or extreme chem/bio hazard, no reason not
to try. Even the dynamited Nordhausen complex was re-entered years
later.

If you have the security clearance, let's get together and do so.

If you have ever held a security clearance you'd know just having one
doesn't prove a need to know.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

On Sat, 08 Oct 2011 14:59:48 -0500, Dan wrote:

On 10/8/2011 2:41 PM, Tom wrote:
On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 10:34:40 -0700 (PDT), David E. Powell wrote:

UPDATED Wednesday 9/21. No radioactivity was found in either of the
bases. Method of attack still unknown. Damage is so extreme there will
be no effort to access them. Scroll to bottom of article for more.

Given lack of radioactivity or extreme chem/bio hazard, no reason not
to try. Even the dynamited Nordhausen complex was re-entered years
later.

If you have the security clearance, let's get together and do so.

If you have ever held a security clearance you'd know just having one
doesn't prove a need to know.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

I've had several for several USAF, NSA and CIA projects including "Q"
and subsections of TS.

I fail to see the point you are making.

On 10/8/2011 3:53 PM, Tom wrote:
On Sat, 08 Oct 2011 14:59:48 -0500, Dan wrote:

On 10/8/2011 2:41 PM, Tom wrote:
On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 10:34:40 -0700 (PDT), David E. Powell wrote:

UPDATED Wednesday 9/21. No radioactivity was found in either of the
bases. Method of attack still unknown. Damage is so extreme there will
be no effort to access them. Scroll to bottom of article for more.

Given lack of radioactivity or extreme chem/bio hazard, no reason not
to try. Even the dynamited Nordhausen complex was re-entered years
later.

If you have the security clearance, let's get together and do so.

If you have ever held a security clearance you'd know just having one
doesn't prove a need to know.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

I've had several for several USAF, NSA and CIA projects including "Q"
and subsections of TS.

I fail to see the point you are making.

OK, since it is obvious you have never actually held a clearance I
will keep it simple. If person A and person B each hold an identical
clearance but work for different activities A doesn't have a need to
know what B is doing.

BTW, there's no such thing as a USAF clearance. The confidential,
secret and top secret clearances are DOD.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

Tom wrote:
On Sat, 08 Oct 2011 14:59:48 -0500, Dan wrote:

On 10/8/2011 2:41 PM, Tom wrote:
On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 10:34:40 -0700 (PDT), David E. Powell wrote:

UPDATED Wednesday 9/21. No radioactivity was found in either of the
bases. Method of attack still unknown. Damage is so extreme there
will be no effort to access them. Scroll to bottom of article for
more.

Given lack of radioactivity or extreme chem/bio hazard, no reason
not to try. Even the dynamited Nordhausen complex was re-entered
years later.

If you have the security clearance, let's get together and do so.

If you have ever held a security clearance you'd know just having
one doesn't prove a need to know.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

I've had several for several USAF, NSA and CIA projects including "Q"
and subsections of TS.


Bull**** , if you had a security clearance at any level you would
recognize why.

Keith

On Oct 8, 2:53*pm, Tom wrote:
On Sat, 08 Oct 2011 14:59:48 -0500, Dan wrote:
On 10/8/2011 2:41 PM, Tom wrote:
On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 10:34:40 -0700 (PDT), David E. Powell wrote:

UPDATED Wednesday 9/21. No radioactivity was found in either of the
bases. Method of attack still unknown. Damage is so extreme there will
be no effort to access them. Scroll to bottom of article for more.

Given lack of radioactivity or extreme chem/bio hazard, no reason not
to try. Even the dynamited Nordhausen complex was re-entered years
later.

If you have the security clearance, let's get together and do so.

* *If you have ever held a security clearance you'd know just having one
doesn't prove a need to know.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

I've had several for several USAF, NSA and CIA projects including "Q"
and subsections of TS.

I fail to see the point you are making.-

Then you know that George Lucas, Steven Spielberg, Madonna and many
others are not from earth, they are running the CIA and all
intelligence operations, which means staging PSYOPs and also control
all flying saucer space flight, the huge secret arsenal of technology
acquired from the 3rd Reich which is light years beyond all admitted
technology that NASA claims to have.

Disclosure is a must, you know Bob Lazar & Steve Greer are the same
individual, an Alpha Centaurian, who morphs the different body style
(Steven Greer a bodybuilder).

You guys got all these secret clearances lets make sure you don't
forget you're obliged to serve the common people namely the American
public.

Make disclosure happen...

On Oct 8, 3:41*pm, Tom wrote:
On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 10:34:40 -0700 (PDT), David E. Powell wrote:
UPDATED Wednesday 9/21. No radioactivity was found in either of the
bases. Method of attack still unknown. Damage is so extreme there will
be no effort to access them. Scroll to bottom of article for more.

Given lack of radioactivity or extreme chem/bio hazard, no reason not
to try. Even the dynamited Nordhausen complex was re-entered years
later.

If you have the security clearance, let's get together and do so.

Let's get the people who wrote the story. As they gave details about
the inside of the base surely they've been in there. Let's go together
with a camera to take pictures.

I mean they have to know this stuff somehow, so surely they have GPS
locations, pictures, etc. of these supposed secret bases.

Heck if we have satellite coordinates or GPS stuff Google Earth will
be our initial recon.

Please post GPS coordinates of these base complexes, we should be able
to see surface features or if collapsed a sunken area where the earth
or bunker caved in.

On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 20:05:30 -0700 (PDT), David E. Powell wrote:

On Oct 8, 3:41*pm, Tom wrote:
On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 10:34:40 -0700 (PDT), David E. Powell wrote:
UPDATED Wednesday 9/21. No radioactivity was found in either of the
bases. Method of attack still unknown. Damage is so extreme there will
be no effort to access them. Scroll to bottom of article for more.

Given lack of radioactivity or extreme chem/bio hazard, no reason not
to try. Even the dynamited Nordhausen complex was re-entered years
later.

If you have the security clearance, let's get together and do so.

Let's get the people who wrote the story. As they gave details about
the inside of the base surely they've been in there.

No they have made it very clear that their information is not onsite.
Read the article.

On Oct 8, 11:43*pm, Tom wrote:
On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 20:05:30 -0700 (PDT), David E. Powell wrote:
On Oct 8, 3:41 pm, Tom wrote:
On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 10:34:40 -0700 (PDT), David E. Powell wrote:
UPDATED Wednesday 9/21. No radioactivity was found in either of the
bases. Method of attack still unknown. Damage is so extreme there will
be no effort to access them. Scroll to bottom of article for more.

Given lack of radioactivity or extreme chem/bio hazard, no reason not
to try. Even the dynamited Nordhausen complex was re-entered years
later.

If you have the security clearance, let's get together and do so.

Let's get the people who wrote the story. As they gave details about
the inside of the base surely they've been in there.

No they have made it very clear that their information is not onsite.
Read the article.

I did. My point being that unless there was an extreme radiation,
biological or chemical hazard, as the writer said there was not, even
my untrained self could go there with a camera and take some
pictures.

So the article asks people to buy some base in an undisclosed location
existed at one time, was destroyed in an unknown way, and there are no
people who have gone down because, well, worried over damage, which is
ridiculous as things like Nordhausen and other collapsed underground
base complexes have been entered over the years, in some cases decades
after they were collapsed.

It's a fancy tale with no proof posited by people who freak out when
asked for some. WIthout proof it is a waste of time.

Failing exact coordinates, is there a general area for these bases
that were known to exist and known to be destroyed with no proof of
existence or destruction given? We could search with publically
available satellite technology for traces of above ground structures
or caved in areas. In fact you sould want this more than I do because
you believe the story and are presumably attempting to convince
others.